Difference between revisions of "Python 3"
(Adding general info (from PL-8 due to their sameness) and updated usage and history) (Tag: Visual edit) |
Indo_Pilot (talk | contribs) (Added Baz Meshupar) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<!-- ''List out vehicles that are equipped with the weapon.'' --> | <!-- ''List out vehicles that are equipped with the weapon.'' --> | ||
| + | * {{Specs-Link|f-5e_fcu_thailand}} | ||
* {{Specs-Link|kfir_c2}} | * {{Specs-Link|kfir_c2}} | ||
* {{Specs-Link|kfir_c7}} | * {{Specs-Link|kfir_c7}} | ||
* {{Specs-Link|f-4e_kurnass_2000}} | * {{Specs-Link|f-4e_kurnass_2000}} | ||
* {{Specs-Link|f_16a_block_10_iaf}} | * {{Specs-Link|f_16a_block_10_iaf}} | ||
| + | * {{Specs-Link|f_15a_iaf}} | ||
| + | * {{Specs-Link|f_15c_baz_msip}} | ||
== General info == | == General info == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 20: | ||
=== Effective damage === | === Effective damage === | ||
| − | Python 3 with 5 kg of HBX filler has around 8 kg TNTe will produce both explosion and shrapnel damage to enemy | + | <!-- ''Describe the type of damage produced by this type of missile (high explosive, splash damage, etc)'' --> |
| + | The Python 3 with 5 kg of HBX filler has around 8 kg TNTe. It will produce both explosion and shrapnel damage to enemy aircraft, penetrating airframes or blowing off parts off the aircraft. | ||
=== Comparison with analogues === | === Comparison with analogues === | ||
| − | + | <!-- ''Give a comparative description of missiles that have firepower equal to this weapon.'' --> | |
| − | [[R-73]] - Soviet IR AAM with identical overload; while having lesser explosive content and shorter combat radius. | + | * [[AIM-9L Sidewinder|AIM-9L]] - US/NATO standard IR AAM with very long guidance time; while having lesser overload, head-on range and explosive content. |
| − | + | * [[AIM-9M Sidewinder|AIM-9M]] - Missile based on the AIM-9L equipped with an advanced heat seeker which has IRCCM capabilities and a low/reduced smoke motor. | |
| − | [[Matra R550 Magic 2|Magic-2]] - French standard IR AAM with higher explosive content, | + | * [[R-73]] - Soviet IR AAM with identical overload; while having lesser explosive content and a shorter combat radius. |
| + | * [[Matra R550 Magic 2|Magic-2]] - French standard IR AAM with higher explosive content, slightly more guidance time and a faster flight speed; while having slightly less overload but identical head-on range. | ||
== Usage in battles == | == Usage in battles == | ||
| − | As one of the most advanced IR AAM of its era, Python excels | + | <!-- ''Describe situations when you would utilise this missile in-game (vehicle, pillbox, base, etc)'' --> |
| + | As one of the most advanced IR AAM of its era, the Python 3 excels in terms of velocity, overload factor, and damage. The overall combat radius is also long enough for strikes even at 3 km and above, there are cases where the Python 3 could hit enemy targets at a higher altitude and long distance (thanks to lesser air density and its powerful rocket engine). The speed and damage of the missile at Mach 3.5 also helps it deliver fatal blow to careless enemies or sitting ducks which depleted their energy for an evasive manoeuvre. Although carriers of the Python 3 currently lack HMD unlike its Chinese cousin, up to 6 x Python 3 on F-16A Netz can still be an ultimate nightmare for enemy jets. Be sure not to fire them within 1.2 km radius when in a head-on as these missiles doesn't have thrust vectoring for very tight manoeuvres, wasting a chance to take down enemies. | ||
=== Pros and cons === | === Pros and cons === | ||
| Line 37: | Line 43: | ||
* High velocity on par with Soviet SARH-based missiles at Mach 3.5 | * High velocity on par with Soviet SARH-based missiles at Mach 3.5 | ||
* Long combat radius | * Long combat radius | ||
| − | * Loaded | + | * Loaded high explosive payload |
'''Cons:''' | '''Cons:''' | ||
| Line 45: | Line 51: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| − | As the production of Israeli domestic AAM has gone smoothly after the production of Shafrir-1/2 | + | <!-- ''Examine the history of the creation and combat usage of the weapon in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the weapon and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Weapon-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>.'' --> |
| + | As the production of Israeli domestic AAM has gone smoothly after the production of Shafrir-1/2 in the 1970s, they have been proved very effective against enemy jets, especially when IAF shot down 89 jets with the Shafrir-2. However, the ongoing conflicts with surrounding Arabic countries and introduction of more advanced jets for these countries also called for a new IR AAM that can achieve head-on attacks - USAF by the time already has AIM-9L in 1977 while Soviet was still working on the R-60M variant (introduced in 1982). The development of the Python 3 started in 1978 where Rafael ditched Hebrew names for the missile family and opted for an English name instead. As soon as Israel started to be involved in the Lebanese War in 1982, the IAF launched the Operation Mole Cricket 19 where it achieved no losses against around 82 (up to 86 vary by sources) Lebanese/Syrian jets and destroying their SAM systems for further air superiority. During the "Bekaa Valley Turkey Shoot", the IAF also introduced their head-on IR AAMs including US-built AIM-9Ls and their latest Python 3 in operation, where the latter scored around 50 victories among the 82 victories. Although being a missile from 1982, the Python 3 is now still used by IAF alongside with its more advanced cousins, Python 4 and 5.<ref>https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39648/israeli-f-15s-were-armed-with-old-missiles-during-b-52-escort</ref> | ||
| − | Soon after the "Turkey | + | Soon after the "Turkey Shoot", Chinese military officials and engineers also deemed Python 3 as a good bargain to upgrade the PLAAF fleet with more advanced Western missiles before domestic alternatives were commissioned. The deal which included the production line and 1,500 missiles was set in 1983 under the name Project No.8 (八号工程), later renamed PL-8 as the project was finalized and the new missile entered service in 1986. The technologies used on Python 3 also set the foundation of future Chinese domestic missiles i.e. export-only PL-9, which has many similarities with Python 3 except having a more conventional tail like those on PL-5 series for evading the export restrictions under the Sino-Israeli contract; meanwhile, PLAAF also developed an IRCCM variant, PL-8B as the main IR AAM for the air force by 21st century. |
== Media == | == Media == | ||
| Line 67: | Line 74: | ||
[[Category:Suspended armaments]] | [[Category:Suspended armaments]] | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:12, 28 October 2024
Contents
Description
The Python 3 is an Israeli heatseeking missile, being a further development of the Shafrir 2. Produced by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, it was much improved and has seen widespread service. Notably in the 1982 Lebanon war, it performed very well, gaining between 35-50 kills to its name. The PLAAF was also enthused with it, liscensing it as the PL-8.
The Python 3 was introduced in Update "La Royale", and comfortably sits as one of, if not the best short range IR missile. Compared to the AIM-9L and R-60M, it is faster and at 40Gs, pulls much harder than both. It has better range than the R-60M, and in most cases the AIM-9L, although in theory at high altitude the AIM-9L will outrange it. It works well being shot at strange angles that enemies will not expect, to avoid being flared away.
Vehicles equipped with this weapon
General info
Tell us about the tactical and technical characteristics of the missile.
Effective damage
The Python 3 with 5 kg of HBX filler has around 8 kg TNTe. It will produce both explosion and shrapnel damage to enemy aircraft, penetrating airframes or blowing off parts off the aircraft.
Comparison with analogues
- AIM-9L - US/NATO standard IR AAM with very long guidance time; while having lesser overload, head-on range and explosive content.
- AIM-9M - Missile based on the AIM-9L equipped with an advanced heat seeker which has IRCCM capabilities and a low/reduced smoke motor.
- R-73 - Soviet IR AAM with identical overload; while having lesser explosive content and a shorter combat radius.
- Magic-2 - French standard IR AAM with higher explosive content, slightly more guidance time and a faster flight speed; while having slightly less overload but identical head-on range.
Usage in battles
As one of the most advanced IR AAM of its era, the Python 3 excels in terms of velocity, overload factor, and damage. The overall combat radius is also long enough for strikes even at 3 km and above, there are cases where the Python 3 could hit enemy targets at a higher altitude and long distance (thanks to lesser air density and its powerful rocket engine). The speed and damage of the missile at Mach 3.5 also helps it deliver fatal blow to careless enemies or sitting ducks which depleted their energy for an evasive manoeuvre. Although carriers of the Python 3 currently lack HMD unlike its Chinese cousin, up to 6 x Python 3 on F-16A Netz can still be an ultimate nightmare for enemy jets. Be sure not to fire them within 1.2 km radius when in a head-on as these missiles doesn't have thrust vectoring for very tight manoeuvres, wasting a chance to take down enemies.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- High overload factor of 40G
- High velocity on par with Soviet SARH-based missiles at Mach 3.5
- Long combat radius
- Loaded high explosive payload
Cons:
- Vulnerable to flares
- Heavier than its NATO/Warsaw Pact counterparts
History
As the production of Israeli domestic AAM has gone smoothly after the production of Shafrir-1/2 in the 1970s, they have been proved very effective against enemy jets, especially when IAF shot down 89 jets with the Shafrir-2. However, the ongoing conflicts with surrounding Arabic countries and introduction of more advanced jets for these countries also called for a new IR AAM that can achieve head-on attacks - USAF by the time already has AIM-9L in 1977 while Soviet was still working on the R-60M variant (introduced in 1982). The development of the Python 3 started in 1978 where Rafael ditched Hebrew names for the missile family and opted for an English name instead. As soon as Israel started to be involved in the Lebanese War in 1982, the IAF launched the Operation Mole Cricket 19 where it achieved no losses against around 82 (up to 86 vary by sources) Lebanese/Syrian jets and destroying their SAM systems for further air superiority. During the "Bekaa Valley Turkey Shoot", the IAF also introduced their head-on IR AAMs including US-built AIM-9Ls and their latest Python 3 in operation, where the latter scored around 50 victories among the 82 victories. Although being a missile from 1982, the Python 3 is now still used by IAF alongside with its more advanced cousins, Python 4 and 5.[1]
Soon after the "Turkey Shoot", Chinese military officials and engineers also deemed Python 3 as a good bargain to upgrade the PLAAF fleet with more advanced Western missiles before domestic alternatives were commissioned. The deal which included the production line and 1,500 missiles was set in 1983 under the name Project No.8 (八号工程), later renamed PL-8 as the project was finalized and the new missile entered service in 1986. The technologies used on Python 3 also set the foundation of future Chinese domestic missiles i.e. export-only PL-9, which has many similarities with Python 3 except having a more conventional tail like those on PL-5 series for evading the export restrictions under the Sino-Israeli contract; meanwhile, PLAAF also developed an IRCCM variant, PL-8B as the main IR AAM for the air force by 21st century.
Media
Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.
See also
Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:
- reference to the article about the variant of the weapon;
- references to approximate analogues by other nations and research trees.
External links
Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:
- topic on the official game forum;
- other literature.
