Difference between revisions of "Cromwell V"
(→Pros and cons) (Tag: Visual edit) |
(→Description) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Description == | == Description == | ||
<!-- ''In the description, the first part should be about the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle, as well as its key features. In the second part, tell the reader about the ground vehicle in the game. Insert a screenshot of the vehicle, so that if the novice player does not remember the vehicle by name, he will immediately understand what kind of vehicle the article is talking about.'' --> | <!-- ''In the description, the first part should be about the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle, as well as its key features. In the second part, tell the reader about the ground vehicle in the game. Insert a screenshot of the vehicle, so that if the novice player does not remember the vehicle by name, he will immediately understand what kind of vehicle the article is talking about.'' --> | ||
− | + | Combat experience in Africa in 1941 showed that, despite its excellent anti-tank characteristics, the [[Cromwell I]] sorely lacked a powerful high-explosive shell. To achieve this goal, it was necessary to increase the gun's calibre; thus, the 75 mm Ordnance QF Mk.V was created by boring out the 6-pounder, allowing it to fire American 75 mm cartridges designed for the [[M4A1|Sherman]]. In this capacity, the new Cromwell acquired a universal tank gun, with which it fought its way from Normandy to Berlin and even participated in the Korean War. Tank crews liked the tank's mobility, but they also noted the cramped fighting compartment, the overall "capriciousness" of the design, and the frequent breakdowns. | |
− | + | Introduced along with the initial British ground tree in [[Update 1.55 "Royal Armour"]], the '''Cromwell V''' is an adequately armoured cruiser tank that is armed with a rather inadequate [[Ordnance QF Mk.V (75 mm)|75 mm cannon]] due to poor post-penetration performance. However, the Cromwell V's forward speed makes it a very good flag runner akin to the [[M18 GMC|M18 Hellcat]]. Despite being a later and more modern version than the Mk I, it has a slightly lower BR than the [[Cromwell I|Mk.I]] and arrives first in the tech tree. This is due to its 75 mm gun, which offers less penetration than the [[Ordnance QF 6-pounder Mk.III (57 mm)|57 mm]] in the Mk. I, and thus makes many higher BR tanks effectively invulnerable to it. In its match-ups, the Cromwell V is an average opponent, but will easily outrun anything on the map to take up effective positions for the first shot, doling out some mediocre damage before running off to another location. Skill is required to maximize the vehicle's speed, rectangular armour, and firepower against enemy vehicles equipped with APHE shells. Excellent aim is very important to get the job done. | |
− | |||
− | |||
== General info == | == General info == | ||
Line 137: | Line 135: | ||
* Excellent gun depression of -12°. | * Excellent gun depression of -12°. | ||
+ | * Very fast acceleration. | ||
* Very sensitive brakes enables Cromwell to land shots almost immediately after stopping. | * Very sensitive brakes enables Cromwell to land shots almost immediately after stopping. | ||
− | * Decent front turret armour of 64 mm, with | + | * Decent front turret armour of 64 mm, with overlapping plates adding up to around 150mm of armour |
* Exceptional speed for a medium tank. | * Exceptional speed for a medium tank. | ||
− | * Acceptable reload for 75 mm gun that allows a steady rate of fire | + | * Acceptable reload for 75 mm gun that allows a steady rate of fire. |
+ | * Armour can be compounded angled to the sides for extra effectiveness. | ||
* Very good flanker and rushing caps at early game. | * Very good flanker and rushing caps at early game. | ||
* Has neutral steering. | * Has neutral steering. | ||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
* Low profile. | * Low profile. | ||
* Excellent climbing ability (both in reverse and forwards). | * Excellent climbing ability (both in reverse and forwards). | ||
− | |||
* Great turret rotation for a Rank 2 medium tank (beaten only by the T-34). | * Great turret rotation for a Rank 2 medium tank (beaten only by the T-34). | ||
+ | * Quite survivable with the interior plates | ||
'''Cons:''' | '''Cons:''' | ||
+ | * Only solid shot ammunition for armour-piercing shells, which is not very amazing compared to APHE other tanks have | ||
+ | * 75 mm gun only average in anti-tank capabilities. | ||
* The sensitive brakes can throw aim off in the instance, letting a prepared enemy fire first. | * The sensitive brakes can throw aim off in the instance, letting a prepared enemy fire first. | ||
− | |||
* Armour is only supported by raw thickness due to its flat, boxy construction. Requires manual compound angling to improve effectiveness. | * Armour is only supported by raw thickness due to its flat, boxy construction. Requires manual compound angling to improve effectiveness. | ||
* Using the Cromwell for frontal engagements is not advised, should use flanking tactics instead and let heavier allies like the Matildas and Churchills to take frontal assault. | * Using the Cromwell for frontal engagements is not advised, should use flanking tactics instead and let heavier allies like the Matildas and Churchills to take frontal assault. | ||
Line 160: | Line 161: | ||
* Ammunition racks litter all around the hull center. | * Ammunition racks litter all around the hull center. | ||
* Prone to fishtailing or breaking out, A and D keys can be merely tapped, effectively uncontrollable at high speeds. | * Prone to fishtailing or breaking out, A and D keys can be merely tapped, effectively uncontrollable at high speeds. | ||
− | * | + | * Very poor reverse speed, just 3 km/h (1.8 mph). |
* Unlockable M61 APCBC shell with acceptable ricochet characteristics loses extra penetration the stock M72 shell has. | * Unlockable M61 APCBC shell with acceptable ricochet characteristics loses extra penetration the stock M72 shell has. | ||
* Lacks any sort of gun stabilization. | * Lacks any sort of gun stabilization. |
Latest revision as of 18:16, 28 August 2024
This page is about the British medium tank Cromwell V. For other versions, see Cromwell (Family). |
Contents
Description
Combat experience in Africa in 1941 showed that, despite its excellent anti-tank characteristics, the Cromwell I sorely lacked a powerful high-explosive shell. To achieve this goal, it was necessary to increase the gun's calibre; thus, the 75 mm Ordnance QF Mk.V was created by boring out the 6-pounder, allowing it to fire American 75 mm cartridges designed for the Sherman. In this capacity, the new Cromwell acquired a universal tank gun, with which it fought its way from Normandy to Berlin and even participated in the Korean War. Tank crews liked the tank's mobility, but they also noted the cramped fighting compartment, the overall "capriciousness" of the design, and the frequent breakdowns.
Introduced along with the initial British ground tree in Update 1.55 "Royal Armour", the Cromwell V is an adequately armoured cruiser tank that is armed with a rather inadequate 75 mm cannon due to poor post-penetration performance. However, the Cromwell V's forward speed makes it a very good flag runner akin to the M18 Hellcat. Despite being a later and more modern version than the Mk I, it has a slightly lower BR than the Mk.I and arrives first in the tech tree. This is due to its 75 mm gun, which offers less penetration than the 57 mm in the Mk. I, and thus makes many higher BR tanks effectively invulnerable to it. In its match-ups, the Cromwell V is an average opponent, but will easily outrun anything on the map to take up effective positions for the first shot, doling out some mediocre damage before running off to another location. Skill is required to maximize the vehicle's speed, rectangular armour, and firepower against enemy vehicles equipped with APHE shells. Excellent aim is very important to get the job done.
General info
Survivability and armour
Armour type:
- Rolled homogeneous armour
- Cast homogeneous armour (Gun mantlet)
Armour | Front | Sides | Rear | Roof |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hull | 63.5 mm (1°) Front plate 25.4 mm (71°) Front glacis 57 mm (18°) Joint plate 25.4 mm (65°) Lower glacis |
25.4 mm | 32 mm | 14 mm |
Turret | 76.2 mm (1°) Turret front 63.5 (1°) Gun mantlet |
63.5 mm | 57.1 mm (1°) | 20 mm |
Notes:
- Suspension wheels and tracks are 20 mm thick.
Mobility
Game Mode | Max Speed (km/h) | Weight (tons) | Engine power (horsepower) | Power-to-weight ratio (hp/ton) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forward | Reverse | Stock | Upgraded | Stock | Upgraded | ||
Arcade | 58 | 4 | 28 | 930 | 1,145 | 33.21 | 40.89 |
Realistic | 52 | 4 | 531 | 600 | 18.96 | 21.43 |
Modifications and economy
Armaments
Main armament
75 mm OQF Mk.V | Turret rotation speed (°/s) | Reloading rate (seconds) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mode | Capacity | Vertical | Horizontal | Stabilizer | Stock | Upgraded | Full | Expert | Aced | Stock | Full | Expert | Aced |
Arcade | 64 | -12°/+20° | ±180° | N/A | 23.8 | 32.9 | 40.0 | 44.2 | 47.1 | 6.50 | 5.75 | 5.30 | 5.00 |
Realistic | 14.9 | 17.5 | 21.3 | 23.5 | 25.0 |
Ammunition
Penetration statistics | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm) | |||||
10 m | 100 m | 500 m | 1,000 m | 1,500 m | 2,000 m | ||
M72 shot | AP | 91 | 88 | 78 | 67 | 57 | 49 |
M61 shot | APCBC | 103 | 100 | 89 | 77 | 66 | 57 |
M48 shell | HE | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Shell details | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Fuse delay (m) |
Fuse sensitivity (mm) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (g) |
Ricochet | |||||
0% | 50% | 100% | ||||||||||
M72 shot | AP | 619 | 6.3 | - | - | - | 47° | 60° | 65° | |||
M61 shot | APCBC | 618 | 6.53 | - | - | - | 48° | 63° | 71° | |||
M48 shell | HE | 463 | 6.3 | 0 | 0.1 | 666 | 79° | 80° | 81° |
Smoke shell characteristics | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Screen radius (m) |
Screen deploy time (s) |
Screen hold time (s) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (g) |
M89 | 259 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 50 |
Ammo racks
Full ammo |
1st rack empty |
2nd rack empty |
3rd rack empty |
4th rack empty |
5th rack empty |
6th rack empty |
Visual discrepancy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
64 | 50 (+14) | 45 (+19) | 31 (+33) | 17 (+47) | 12 (+52) | 0 (+64) | No |
Optics
Cromwell V Optics | ||
---|---|---|
Which ones | Default magnification | Maximum magnification |
Main Gun optics | x1.85 | x3.5 |
Comparable optics | Pz.III L |
Machine guns
7.92 mm BESA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mount | Capacity (Belt) | Fire rate | Vertical | Horizontal |
Coaxial | 4,950 (225) | 600 | N/A | N/A |
Usage in battles
The Cromwell fighting prowess is due to its manoeuvrability and gun rotation. This is thanks to the combination of the Rover Meteor engine, essentially a Rolls-Royce Merlin of Spitfire fame with the supercharger removed, and its Merrit-Brown triple-differential transmission. This gives the Cromwell power even while it manoeuvres so it maintains speed much better than those tanks using traditional clutch-and-brake systems like practically everything in this BR. This not only allows it to spin in place and easily run around obstacles, but it can also out-climb almost every tank in the game, allowing it to go places the enemy might not expect to find you. But mostly this gives it unmatched speed, allowing you to reach the good sniping spots before anyone else in the match. But there is a down side to the Cromwell's amazing speed, going in reverse will only let you go up to 3 km/h, and rarely will you be able to damage a tank enough to get a similarly effective second shot; either the tanks was still drivable and retreated to cover, angled to best bounce your next shot, or 1 shot you in return with APHE.
Once upgraded, the Cromwell's turret rotation is one of the best for the rank, only beaten by the T-34 that has a rotation speed of 29°/s (fully aced crew). This allows an upgraded Cromwell to quickly engage targets in different angles, important for close-quarter fighting. German tanks will come close to you but not be able to catch up with you in some situations, but this being said; do not go into the hell of battle thinking "My turret rotation is fast enough to beat all of youse!" because that will get the Cromwell destroyed by a tank who only needs to hit your turret from the front to disable you. And as said before your reverse speed isn't that fast so if you are in this situation all you can do is pray and hope that your team mates come up to help you out or in worst case scenario you get taken out straight away from a side on hit. But instead help out the team from a distance of around 0-550m or if you feel like sniping from a distance your max range is 850m.
The downside to this tank is its thin hull armour, especially on the sides. Everything on the map can penetrate the Cromwell hull, even from the front. This includes SPAAs, who will easily tear the Cromwell apart, especially the Wirbelwind that will do so at almost all ranges typically encountered and any angle. The Cromwell's turret is somewhat better off, with just over 60 mm on the front and sides, but the flat plates are easily penetrated by any type of shell. The closely packed interior means it's a one-hit-to-burn design for anything with a 75 mm, and at 3.3 BR these will be on almost all tanks you face. Keep moving! If you take a shot or get shot at, re-position, don't ever try to fight it out. You're so much faster and more manoeuvrable than anything you meet that you can almost always find a better location to go after any target. Just don't try to reverse; it's single reverse gear gets you 2 mph (3 km/h), meaning you're likely better off spinning in place and then driving away.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Excellent gun depression of -12°.
- Very fast acceleration.
- Very sensitive brakes enables Cromwell to land shots almost immediately after stopping.
- Decent front turret armour of 64 mm, with overlapping plates adding up to around 150mm of armour
- Exceptional speed for a medium tank.
- Acceptable reload for 75 mm gun that allows a steady rate of fire.
- Armour can be compounded angled to the sides for extra effectiveness.
- Very good flanker and rushing caps at early game.
- Has neutral steering.
- Performs exceptionally well when working with other allied tanks with different role.
- Excellent manoeuvrability.
- Standard 5 crew members allow a margin of crew casualties before a decrease in combat performance.
- Low profile.
- Excellent climbing ability (both in reverse and forwards).
- Great turret rotation for a Rank 2 medium tank (beaten only by the T-34).
- Quite survivable with the interior plates
Cons:
- Only solid shot ammunition for armour-piercing shells, which is not very amazing compared to APHE other tanks have
- 75 mm gun only average in anti-tank capabilities.
- The sensitive brakes can throw aim off in the instance, letting a prepared enemy fire first.
- Armour is only supported by raw thickness due to its flat, boxy construction. Requires manual compound angling to improve effectiveness.
- Using the Cromwell for frontal engagements is not advised, should use flanking tactics instead and let heavier allies like the Matildas and Churchills to take frontal assault.
- Weak side armour.
- Ammunition racks litter all around the hull center.
- Prone to fishtailing or breaking out, A and D keys can be merely tapped, effectively uncontrollable at high speeds.
- Very poor reverse speed, just 3 km/h (1.8 mph).
- Unlockable M61 APCBC shell with acceptable ricochet characteristics loses extra penetration the stock M72 shell has.
- Lacks any sort of gun stabilization.
- Gun elevation speed is extremely poor.
- Neutral steering only works on flat terrain.
History
Development
Development for the tank started back in 1940, just around the time the Crusader cruiser tank was being put into service in the British Army. The development of a stronger cruiser tank was initiated due to the belief that that the Crusader would become obsolete in the face of more advanced German tanks as the time pass. The initial plans was for the tank to mount the OQF 6-pounder gun and was to be completed in 1942. The project was taken up by three companies who submitted their designs. Vauxhall developed the A23, a scaled down Churchill tank with 75 mm of armour and a 12-cylinder Bedford engine. Nuffield developed the A24 based off the Crusader that was powered by the Liberty engine and had an advantage of being put into production quickly. Leyland and Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon developed a design that was similar to Nuffield's, but with different suspension and track designs. All these designs were examined in January 1941 and it was decided that Nuffield's A24 would become the vehicle of choice for the project. Six prototypes of the vehicle, now called Cromwell I were ordered for delivery in the Spring of 1942, but arrived four months late, with current events making the tank designs outdated. Despite that, the tank was put into production and experienced an unsatisfactory performance history as being an under-powered tank. The lack of available tanks led to the demands for more 6-pounders on the battlefield, which were used to be mounted on the older tank designs.
When Britain entered the war, Rolls-Royce stopped producing cars and set up a team to find ways to use their production lines. The team was made under Roy Robotham at Clan Foundry near the city of Belper. Meeting with Henry Spurrier of Leyland, they talked tank designs and a project began of fitting a Rolls-Royce Merlin engine onto a tank. A Leyland-built Crusader was used for the test, removing the supercharger from the engine before installing it in the tank. The result was an absurdly fast tank, able to reach a speed of 80 km/h, estimated since timing the speed runs was difficult. The impressive performance had Leyland organize a production for 1,000 units of the engine, renamed as the Meteor. This plan was changed after concerns of the engine's cooling was raised, Leyland decides to produce their own version of Meteor which was weaker (350 hp) compared to the Rolls design (500 hp). Thus, the Tank Board decided to just order the engine straight from Rolls-Royce for the Meteor engine. The A24 tank design with the Meteor engine was redesignated as the A27. During the development, Leyland suggested that the tank should be made to fit both the Meteor and the American-designed Liberty engine, thus the designation expanded to A27M (Meteor) and the A27L (Liberty) and were called Cromwell III and Cromwell II respectively. Leyland's attempt at building their own engine was abandoned. The A27M tank was made into a prototype and delivered on January 1942, it proved extremely mobile with its 600 hp engine and orders were placed for both engine versions. This proved difficult due to production difficulties with the Meteor and soon Leyland took over production of both versions. Production lines for the Meteor engine continued to be strained until late 1942, where Ernest Hives of Rolls met with Spencer Wilks of the company Rover made a deal in January 1943 to exchange factories, with Rolls establishing a Meteor engine factory at Barnoldswick, Lancashire.
Production of the tank began in November 1942 with new names given out the tanks. The original A24 Cromwell I from Nuffield was renamed the Cavalier, the Liberty powered Cromwell II became the Centaur, and the Meteor powered Cromwell III retained the name as the Cromwell. The actual Cromwell tank production was delayed until January 1943 due to low supply of Meteor engines until the Rover factory began producing it. With more Meteor engines being produced, the Centaur tanks were often converted to use the Meteor engine, turning them into Cromwells. Field tests with the tanks took place in August to September in 1943 alongside the M4A2 and M4A4 Shermans. The tests proved the Shermans to be more reliable than the Cromwell and Centaurs, needing only about 0.03 hours of mechanical attention every mile compared to the Cromwell's 0.07 hours per mile and the Centaur's 0.08 hours per mile. The two tanks were thus given time to iron out these deficiencies, the Cromwell suffered from oil leaks along with brake and clutch failures. While the tank suffered from these defects, the crews expressed their satisfaction of the designs for their speed and handling, but the Centaur was not given the same attention as the Cromwell. A second test in November had the Cromwell perform with improved results while the Centaur was still experiencing the same problems. The production model was finalized on February 2, 1944 after a specifications for a "Battle Cromwell" came in from Leyland, which included some design changes, an increase of 6 mm on the bottom of the tank, seam welding the joints, and the standard usage of the Meteor engine and the Merritt Brown transmission. The Centaur was relegated to training roles or modified for specialist roles such as anti-aircraft guns or engineering vehicles. Total production for the A27 tank series is 4,016 tanks, of which 950 are Centaurs and 3,066 are Cromwells.
Design
The Cromwell's frame used a riveted construction in its initial production models, but this later changed to welding. The frame was strengthened with bolted armour plates. Companies involved in the A27 production were LMS Railway, Morris Motors, Metro-Cammell, Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon Company, and English Electric. Some of these models were not consistent in construction, such as some variants built with 360 mm wide tracks and some with 393 mm tracks. Suspension was the Christie suspension derived from the earlier cruiser tank designs. Four of the tanks's road wheels have shock absorbers, and no return rollers are available, the tracks are supported on the top of the large road wheels. The gearbox has five forward and one reverse gear, with the first forward gear made for confined areas and sharp turns. While the Meteor engine is capable of going faster, it is restricted to 540 hp output with a governor to avoid straining the engine and suspension. The Cromwell's armaments changed over a few times, it's initial model mounted the 6-pounder gun, but the later models mounted the 75 mm gun. The adaption was easy due to the 75 mm gun being a 6-pounder bored for the larger calibre. A 7.92 mm BESA machine gun was available for coaxial firing on the turret. The armour on the Cromwell started as a 76 mm plate, which increased gradually to 83 mm and 100 mm over time for additional protection.
The A27M Cromwell V was Cromwell variant that used the 75 mm gun and a welded construction, no riveting was used in the frame.
Combat usage
The British, at the time of Operation Overlord, primarily service the M4 Sherman as the main tank of their armoured units, only the armoured brigades of the 7th Armoured Division were equipped with the Cromwell tanks. Although the Cromwell also saw use as armoured reconnaissance regiments in other British divisions such as the Guards Armoured Division and the 11th Armoured Division. Compared to the Sherman, the Cromwell was much faster, so fast that it earned the title as the fastest British tank in World War II. The Cromwell also presented a smaller profile, making it a lower target, and has a thicker frontal armour plate. However, the Cromwell's armour was not sloping, was not as reliable in comparison to the Sherman, and a slightly smaller crew space inside the tank. Nevertheless, the Cromwell proved very mobile and effective on the battlefield alongside the Sherman, often outflanking German armour with their superior speed to hit the tanks on their sides or rear. Since the Cromwells are not able to mount the larger and more powerful 17-pounder and a derivative, the A30 Challenger, met with production issues, Cromwell units were equipped with Sherman Fireflies in order to supplement the firepower of the 17-pounder. Later in the war, these units began to be succeeded by the Comet tank which had more armour and a more powerful 77 mm gun derived from the 17-pounder.
During the war, the Cromwell chassis was used in various specialized roles on the battlefield. The A30 Challenger is a tank design that attempted to mount the 17-pounder on a lengthened Cromwell chassis, the A30 SP Avenger was another attempt to equip the 17-pounder, but used a lighter turret instead. Some were made into observation posts or command tanks. The Centaur saw a wider conversion with some becoming engineering vehicles, armoured recovery vehicles, and armoured personnel carriers. After the war, the British attempted to up-gun the Cromwell into the Charioteer, which was designed in the 1950s to supplement tank units before the Centurion was mass-issued.
The Cromwells were also given out to Allied units such as the 1st Polish Armoured Division and the 1st Czechoslovak Armoured Brigade. These units served in the northern Europe with the Allies as they breakthrough deeper into Europe. After World War II, some Cromwell stayed in service and saw service in the Korean War with the 7th Royal Tank Regiment and the 8th King's Royal Irish Hussars. The Cromwells also were given to Greece, where it had the distinction of being the first tank put into service by the Greek Army. 52 Centaurs were given to Greece in 1946 to fight in the Greek Civil War, but these were stored due to lack of crews with adequate training. Formal training began in Greece began in 1947 with the return of trained officers from Britain. The Centaur saw limited service in the Greek Armoured Corps, fighting in the Greek mountains. These units kept the Centaurs up until 1963 where it was replaced by the American M47 Pattons.
Media
- Skins
- Videos
See also
- Related development
External links
Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:
- topic on the official game forum;
- other literature.
Britain medium tanks | |
---|---|
Valentine | Valentine I · Valentine IX · Valentine XI |
Cromwell | Cromwell I · Cromwell V · Cromwell V (RP-3) |
Cromwell derivatives | Challenger · Avenger · Comet I · Comet I "Iron Duke IV" · Charioteer Mk VII |
Centurion | Centurion Mk 1 · Centurion Mk.2 · Centurion Mk 3 · Centurion Mk.5 AVRE · Centurion Mk 10 · Centurion Action X · FV4202 |
Vickers MBT | Vickers Mk.1 · Vickers Mk.3 · Vickers Mk.7 |
Chieftain | Chieftain Mk 3 · Chieftain Mk 5 · Chieftain Mk 10 |
Challenger 1 | Challenger Mk.2 · Challenger Mk.3 · Challenger DS |
Challenger 2 | Challenger 2 · Challenger 2 (2F) · Challenger 2 TES · Challenger 2 OES · Challenger 2E · Challenger 2 Black Night |
Challenger 3 | Challenger 3 TD |
Australia | A.C.I · A.C.IV · Centurion Mk.5/1 |
South Africa | Olifant Mk.1A · Olifant Mk.2 · TTD |
India | Vijayanta · Bhishma TWMP |
Israel | ▄Sho't Kal Dalet |
Jordan | Khalid |
Sweden | ▄Strv 81 (RB 52) |
USA | Grant I · Sherman II · Sherman Firefly · Sherman IC "Trzyniec" |