Difference between revisions of "Challenger 2E"

From War Thunder Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page)
 
(completed the article)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
<!-- ''In the description, the first part should be about the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle, as well as its key features. In the second part, tell the reader about the ground vehicle in the game. Insert a screenshot of the vehicle, so that if the novice player does not remember the vehicle by name, he will immediately understand what kind of vehicle the article is talking about.'' -->
 
<!-- ''In the description, the first part should be about the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle, as well as its key features. In the second part, tell the reader about the ground vehicle in the game. Insert a screenshot of the vehicle, so that if the novice player does not remember the vehicle by name, he will immediately understand what kind of vehicle the article is talking about.'' -->
 
The '''{{Specs|name}}''' is a rank {{Specs|rank}} British medium tank {{Battle-rating}}. It was introduced in [[Update "Sky Guardians"]].
 
The '''{{Specs|name}}''' is a rank {{Specs|rank}} British medium tank {{Battle-rating}}. It was introduced in [[Update "Sky Guardians"]].
 +
 +
The Challenger 2E is a return to tradition in the Challenger 2 Family, a far more conventional vehicle when compared to the [[Challenger 2 TES]] or the [[Black Night]]. Unlike the other versions of the Challenger 2, it was aimed at the export market, although it failed to receive any orders.
 +
 +
When compared to the other versions of the Challenger 2, it has a substantially more powerful engine, bringing it in-line with many of its international competitors.
  
 
== General info ==
 
== General info ==
Line 12: Line 16:
 
{{Specs-Tank-Armour}}
 
{{Specs-Tank-Armour}}
 
<!-- ''Describe armour protection. Note the most well protected and key weak areas. Appreciate the layout of modules as well as the number and location of crew members. Is the level of armour protection sufficient, is the placement of modules helpful for survival in combat? If necessary use a visual template to indicate the most secure and weak zones of the armour.'' -->
 
<!-- ''Describe armour protection. Note the most well protected and key weak areas. Appreciate the layout of modules as well as the number and location of crew members. Is the level of armour protection sufficient, is the placement of modules helpful for survival in combat? If necessary use a visual template to indicate the most secure and weak zones of the armour.'' -->
''Describe armour protection. Note the most well protected and key weak areas. Appreciate the layout of modules as well as the number and location of crew members. Is the level of armour protection sufficient, is the placement of modules helpful for survival in combat? If necessary use a visual template to indicate the most secure and weak zones of the armour.''
+
Like all Challenger 2 tanks, the armour is exceptional. It is capable of defeating even the most powerful of APFSDS rounds when hull-down, and it can even withstand HEAT rounds to the sides. Nonetheless, it has a few weak spots, particularly the cannon breech and the lower glacis.
 +
 
 +
The armour profile of the Challenger 2E is practically identical to all other Challenger 2 tanks, so there should be no difficulty in adapting from its predecessors.
 +
 
 +
Furthermore, the Challenger 2E lacks any additional armour packages, and does not have access to an [[Active protection systems|active protection system]], leaving it marginally more vulnerable than all other Challenger 2 variants.
  
 
'''Armour type:''' <!-- The types of armour present on the vehicle and their general locations -->
 
'''Armour type:''' <!-- The types of armour present on the vehicle and their general locations -->
 
<!-- Example: * Rolled homogeneous armour (Front, Side, Rear, Hull roof)
 
<!-- Example: * Rolled homogeneous armour (Front, Side, Rear, Hull roof)
 
* Cast homogeneous armour (Turret, Transmission area) -->
 
* Cast homogeneous armour (Turret, Transmission area) -->
 +
* Rolled homogeneous armour
 +
* Cast homogeneous armour
 +
* Composite armour
 +
* Structural steel
 +
* Gun steel
 +
* Rubber-fabric screens
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-
! Armour !! Front (Slope angle) !! Sides !! Rear !! Roof
+
!'''Armour'''!!'''Front (Slope angle)'''!!'''Sides (Slope angle)'''!!'''Rear (Slope angle)'''!!'''Roof (Slope angle)'''
 
|-
 
|-
| Hull || ___ mm || ___ mm ''Top'' <br> ___ mm ''Bottom'' || ___ mm || ___ - ___ mm
+
|Hull
 +
|38-50 mm (60-83°) Upper Glacis
 +
 
 +
70 mm (28°) Lower Glacis
 +
 
 +
60 mm (0-83°) Driver's Port
 +
|25 mm (71°) Top
 +
 
 +
25 mm (0°) Middle
 +
 
 +
38 mm (14°) Bottom
 +
|50 mm (29-65°)
 +
|10-20 mm (79-90°)
 
|-
 
|-
| Turret || ___ - ___ mm ''Turret front'' <br> ___ mm ''Gun mantlet'' || ___ - ___ mm || ___ - ___ mm || ___ - ___ mm
+
|Turret
 +
|100 mm (50°) Turret Cheeks
 +
 
 +
30 mm (13-50°) Gun Mantlet
 +
|10-20 mm (8-10°)
 +
|20 mm (18°)
 +
|10-38 mm (75-90°)
 
|-
 
|-
| Cupola || ___ mm || ___ mm || ___ mm || ___ mm
+
|Cupola
 +
|60 mm (0°)
 +
|60 mm (0°)
 +
|60 mm (0°)
 +
|44 mm (90°)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 32: Line 68:
 
'''Notes:''' <!-- Any additional notes which the user needs to be aware of -->
 
'''Notes:''' <!-- Any additional notes which the user needs to be aware of -->
 
<!-- Example: * Suspension wheels are 20 mm thick, tracks are 30 mm thick, and torsion bars are 60 mm thick. -->
 
<!-- Example: * Suspension wheels are 20 mm thick, tracks are 30 mm thick, and torsion bars are 60 mm thick. -->
 +
* There are two 50 mm RHA plates on the Turret Cheeks leading to a total of 100 mm.
 +
* Negligible structural steel surrounds the hull.
 +
* There is a 38 mm thick set of cast steel armour in the turrets crew compartment.
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
!'''Composite Armour'''
 +
!'''Front (Slope angle)'''
 +
!'''Sides (Slope angle)'''
 +
|-
 +
|Hull
 +
|130 mm RHA + 200 mm NERA
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Turret
 +
|160 mm RHA + 400 mm NERA + 110 mm CHA
 +
|80 mm RHA + 230 mm NERA
 +
|}
 +
'''Notes:'''<!-- Any additional notes which the user needs to be aware of -->
 +
<!-- Example: * Suspension wheels are 20 mm thick, tracks are 30 mm thick, and torsion bars are 60 mm thick. -->
 +
* RHA = rolled homogeneous armour
 +
* CHA = cast homogeneous armour
 +
* NERA = non-explosive reactive armour
  
 
=== Mobility ===
 
=== Mobility ===
 
{{Specs-Tank-Mobility}}
 
{{Specs-Tank-Mobility}}
 
<!-- ''Write about the mobility of the ground vehicle. Estimate the specific power and manoeuvrability, as well as the maximum speed forwards and backwards.'' -->
 
<!-- ''Write about the mobility of the ground vehicle. Estimate the specific power and manoeuvrability, as well as the maximum speed forwards and backwards.'' -->
''Write about the mobility of the ground vehicle. Estimate the specific power and manoeuvrability, as well as the maximum speed forwards and backwards.''
+
The Challenger 2E has improved mobility when compared to all other Challenger 2 variants. This is due to its superior MTU engine, which replaces the comparatively underpowered Perkins CV12-6A used on all other Challenger 2 tanks.
 +
 
 +
The MTU engine is about 20% more powerful than the Perkins CV12-6A.
  
{{tankMobility}}
+
The improved mobility of the Challenger 2E makes it comparable to most other top-tier MBTs, such as the [[Leopard 2A6]] or [[M1A2 SEP]].{{tankMobility|abMinHp=2,325|rbMinHp=1,327}}
  
 
=== Modifications and economy ===
 
=== Modifications and economy ===
Line 50: Line 110:
 
{{main|L30A1 (120 mm)}}
 
{{main|L30A1 (120 mm)}}
  
''Give the reader information about the characteristics of the main gun. Assess its effectiveness in a battle based on the reloading speed, ballistics and the power of shells. Do not forget about the flexibility of the fire, that is how quickly the cannon can be aimed at the target, open fire on it and aim at another enemy. Add a link to the main article on the gun: <code><nowiki>{{main|Name of the weapon}}</nowiki></code>. Describe in general terms the ammunition available for the main gun. Give advice on how to use them and how to fill the ammunition storage.''
+
The Challenger 2E mounts the same cannon as all other Challenger 2 tanks in War Thunder. It performs adequately, although some other nations have more capable cannons on their top-tier MBTs. Unlike most MBT cannons at this battle rating, it is rifled. This is to accommodate the HESH ammunition that is highly regarded in British tank doctrine.
  
 +
The L30A1 is incredibly accurate, although this isn't a unique characteristic for highly rated tanks. The range of ammunition it fires is likewise, good, but nothing special. This is especially damning considering the comparatively limited ammunition selection versus other nation's tanks; the Challenger 2E doesn't have access to HEATFS, HE-VT, or ATGM ammunition.
 +
 +
Where it really shines, however, is it's immense rate of fire. The Challenger 2E - like its predecessors - share the joint title of the fastest 120 mm non-autoloading cannon in War Thunder. The Challenger 2E has one of the fastest firing cannons of any top-tier tank, and can deal out damage at a near absurd rate. With an untrained crew, it has a reload time of 6.5 seconds, however this drops down to an astonishing 5 seconds with an aced crew, lending it a fire rate of 12 rounds per minute.
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="100%"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="100%"
 
|-
 
|-
! colspan="5" | [[L30A1 (120 mm)|120 mm L30A1]] || colspan="5" | Turret rotation speed (°/s) || colspan="4" | Reloading rate (seconds)
+
! colspan="5" | [[L30A1 (120 mm)|'''120 mm L30A1''']] || colspan="5" | '''Turret rotation speed (°/s)''' || colspan="4" | '''Reloading rate (seconds)'''
 
|-
 
|-
! Mode !! Capacity !! Vertical !! Horizontal !! Stabilizer
+
! '''Mode''' !! '''Capacity''' !! '''Vertical''' !! '''Horizontal''' !! '''Stabilizer'''
! Stock !! Upgraded !! Full !! Expert !! Aced
+
! '''Stock''' !! '''Upgraded''' !! '''Full''' !! '''Expert''' !! '''Aced'''
! Stock !! Full !! Expert !! Aced
+
! '''Stock''' !! '''Full''' !! '''Expert''' !! '''Aced'''
 
|-
 
|-
! ''Arcade''
+
! '''''Arcade'''''
| rowspan="2" | 50 || rowspan="2" | -10°/+20° || rowspan="2" | ±180° || rowspan="2" | Two-plane || __._ || __._ || __._ || __._ || __._ || rowspan="2" | _.__ || rowspan="2" | _.__ || rowspan="2" | _.__ || rowspan="2" | _.__
+
| rowspan="2" | 50 || rowspan="2" | -10°/+20° || rowspan="2" | ±180° || rowspan="2" | Two-plane ||29.5||40.8||49.6||54.8||58.4|| rowspan="2" |6.50|| rowspan="2" |5.75|| rowspan="2" |5.30|| rowspan="2" |5.00
 
|-
 
|-
! ''Realistic''
+
! '''''Realistic'''''
| __._ || __._ || __._ || __._ || __._
+
|18.4||21.7||26.4||29.1||31.0
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 76: Line 139:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"
 
|-
 
|-
! Full<br>ammo
+
! '''Full<br>ammo'''
! 1st<br>rack empty
+
!'''Ammo'''
! 2nd<br>rack empty
+
'''Part'''
! 3rd<br>rack empty
+
! '''1st<br>rack empty'''
! 4th<br>rack empty
+
! '''2nd<br>rack empty'''
! 5th<br>rack empty
+
! '''3rd<br>rack empty'''
! 6th<br>rack empty
+
! '''4th<br>rack empty'''
! Visual<br>discrepancy
+
! '''5th<br>rack empty'''
 +
! '''6th<br>rack empty'''
 +
!'''7th'''
 +
'''rack empty'''
 +
!'''8th'''
 +
'''rack empty'''
 +
!'''9th'''
 +
'''rack empty'''
 +
!'''Visual'''
 +
'''discrepancy'''
 
|-
 
|-
| '''50''' || __&nbsp;''(+__)'' || __&nbsp;''(+__)'' || __&nbsp;''(+__)'' || __&nbsp;''(+__)'' || __&nbsp;''(+__)'' || __&nbsp;''(+__)'' || __
+
|'''50'''
 +
|''Projectiles''
 +
''Propellants''
 +
|48&nbsp;''(+2)''
 +
45&nbsp;''(+5)''
 +
|45&nbsp;''(+5)''
 +
39&nbsp;''(+11)''
 +
|43&nbsp;''(+7)''
 +
31&nbsp;''(+19)''
 +
|41&nbsp;''(+9)''
 +
22&nbsp;''(+28)''
 +
|34&nbsp;''(+16)''
 +
14&nbsp;''(+36)''
 +
|29&nbsp;''(+21)''
 +
5&nbsp;''(+45)''
 +
|5&nbsp;''(+45)''
 +
1&nbsp;''(+49)''
 +
|4&nbsp;''(+46)''
 +
&nbsp;
 +
|1&nbsp;''(+49)''
 +
&nbsp;
 +
|No
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 95: Line 188:
 
{{main|M2HB (12.7 mm)|L94A1 (7.62 mm)}}
 
{{main|M2HB (12.7 mm)|L94A1 (7.62 mm)}}
  
''Offensive and anti-aircraft machine guns not only allow you to fight some aircraft but also are effective against lightly armoured vehicles. Evaluate machine guns and give recommendations on its use.''
+
The Challenger 2E has access to one 7.62 mm coaxial machine gun, and one 12.7 mm machine gun mounted on the roof. All other Challenger 2 tanks lack a high calibre machine gun, giving this tank increased lethality against enemy aircraft and light vehicles.
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="50%"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="50%"
Line 103: Line 196:
 
! Mount !! Capacity (Belt) !! Fire rate !! Vertical !! Horizontal
 
! Mount !! Capacity (Belt) !! Fire rate !! Vertical !! Horizontal
 
|-
 
|-
| || ___ (___) || ___ || __° || __°
+
|Pintle||1,000 (200)||650||-10°/+30°||±60°
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 112: Line 205:
 
! Mount !! Capacity (Belt) !! Fire rate !! Vertical !! Horizontal
 
! Mount !! Capacity (Belt) !! Fire rate !! Vertical !! Horizontal
 
|-
 
|-
| || ___ (___) || ___ || __° || __°
+
|Coaxial||4,000 (2,000)||600||-10°/+20°||±0°
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
== Usage in battles ==
 
== Usage in battles ==
<!-- ''Describe the tactics of playing in the vehicle, the features of using vehicles in the team and advice on tactics. Refrain from creating a "guide" - do not impose a single point of view but instead give the reader food for thought. Describe the most dangerous enemies and give recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of the game in different modes (AB, RB, SB).'' -->
+
<!-- ''Describe the tactics of playing in the vehicle, the features of using vehicles in the team and advice on tactics. Refrain from creating a "guide" - do not impose a single point of view but instead give the reader food for thought. Describe the most dangerous enemies and give recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of the game in different modes (AB, RB, SB).'' -->The Challenger 2E should be used in a near-identical fashion to the other Challenger 2 tanks.
''Describe the tactics of playing in the vehicle, the features of using vehicles in the team and advice on tactics. Refrain from creating a "guide" - do not impose a single point of view but instead give the reader food for thought. Describe the most dangerous enemies and give recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of the game in different modes (AB, RB, SB).''
+
 
 +
That is to say:
 +
 
 +
* Remain at long-range
 +
* Lock down enemy advances
 +
* Stay hull-down
 +
* Do not rush in, play patiently
 +
* If advancing, stick with the team
 +
 
 +
Although, the Challenger 2E has substantially improved mobility, so it can be used more aggressively. Players are at liberty to decide how they control this tank far more than its other iterations. However, one must be aware of their positioning relative to the team. Stray too far ahead with that great engine power, and you risk over-extending and becoming isolated, only to be swarmed by enemy tanks.
 +
 
 +
Nonetheless, this is still ill-advised. The Challenger 2E has an advantage over most enemies at long-range. While the tank can be used aggressively, this throws away the advantage. While it doesn't put you at substantially increased risk, you are not as capable as you could be.
  
 
=== Pros and cons ===
 
=== Pros and cons ===
 
<!-- ''Summarise and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in a bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - use substitutions with softer forms such as "inadequate" and "effective".'' -->
 
<!-- ''Summarise and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in a bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - use substitutions with softer forms such as "inadequate" and "effective".'' -->
''Summarise and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in a bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - use substitutions with softer forms such as "inadequate" and "effective".''
+
'''Pros:'''
 +
 
 +
* Very survivable armour profile
 +
* Advanced fire-control system
 +
** Modern [[Night Vision Devices|NVDs]]
 +
* Adequate firepower
 +
** Overwhelming rate of fire
 +
* Competitive mobility
  
'''Pros:'''
 
 
*
 
*
  
 
'''Cons:'''
 
'''Cons:'''
 +
 +
* Large and vulnerable weak spots
 +
* Minimal anti-air capabilities
 +
* Lacks [[Active protection systems|APS]]
 +
 
*
 
*
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==
 
<!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).'' -->
 
<!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).'' -->
''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).''
+
The Challenger 2E was a private venture by [[wikipedia:Vickers_plc|Vickers plc]], aimed at the export market. The 2E was designed after the failure of the Challenger 2 to gain international sales, with only 38 being sold.
 +
 
 +
The Challenger 2E was marketed as being a high-end and capable tank that would outperform all competition, unlike the budget series of the [[Vickers MBT (Family)|Vickers family]]. The primary target for the 2E was the gulf nations, as well as several Mediterranean nations. Adjustments were made to the basic Challenger 2 to accommodate these potential markets, such as native integration of air filtration and air conditioning.
 +
 
 +
Additionally, space was freed up in the crew compartment to accommodate an internal toilet, one of the only tanks in history to do so.
 +
 
 +
Unfortunately for Vickers, the Challenger 2E was a failure, and did not attract any orders. This was one of many contributing factors that led Vickers plc to go under, eventually being folded into BAE Systems.
 +
 
 +
One reason for the failure of the Challenger 2E was the reluctance of the British government to sell the Challenger 2E to foreign countries, due to the immensely classified nature of its Chobham armour profile. Were relations to sour between Britain and the prospective buyer, or were the Challenger 2E to be captured by an enemy state, the exact armour profile of the Challenger 2 could be calculated - and perhaps even reverse engineered.
 +
 
 +
This was especially concerning given the sheer number of tanks using Chobham armour - not only d
 +
 
 +
Additionally, the Challenger 2E performed rather poorly in the 1998 Greek tank trials, irreparably damaging its reputation.
 +
 
 +
By 2005, the Challenger 2E project was entirely abandoned by BAE systems.
  
 
== Media ==
 
== Media ==
 
<!-- ''Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.'' -->
 
<!-- ''Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.'' -->
''Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.''
+
'''Skins'''
 +
 
 +
* [https://live.warthunder.com/feed/camouflages/?vehicle=uk_challenger_2e Skins and camouflages for the Challenger 2E from live.warthunder.com.]
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
 
<!-- ''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:''
 
<!-- ''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:''
 
* ''reference to the series of the vehicles;''
 
* ''reference to the series of the vehicles;''
* ''links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.'' -->
+
* ''links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.'' -->'''Other Challenger 2 tanks'''
''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:''
+
 
* ''reference to the series of the vehicles;''
+
* [[Challenger 2 (Family)]]
* ''links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.''
+
** [[Challenger 2]]
 +
** [[Challenger 2 (2F)]]
 +
** [[Challenger 2 TES]]
 +
** [[Black Night]]
 +
 
 +
'''Analogues in other nations'''
 +
 
 +
* [[M1 Abrams (Family)]]
 +
** [[M1A2 Abrams]]
 +
** [[M1A2 SEP]]
 +
* [[Leopard 2 (Family)]]
 +
** [[Leopard 2A5]]
 +
** [[Leopard 2A6]]
 +
* [[Leclerc (Family)]]
 +
** [[Leclerc]]
 +
** [[Leclerc S2]]
 +
** [[Leclerc SXXI]]
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
Line 150: Line 297:
 
* ''topic on the official game forum;''
 
* ''topic on the official game forum;''
 
* ''other literature.'' -->
 
* ''other literature.'' -->
''Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:''
+
* [[wikipedia:Challenger_2|[Wikipedia] Challenger 2]]
* ''topic on the official game forum;''
+
* [[wt:en/news/8108-development-challenger-2e-hurry-up-sir-en|[Development] Challenger 2E - Hurry up, Sir!]]
* ''other literature.''
 
  
 
{{Britain medium tanks}}
 
{{Britain medium tanks}}

Revision as of 13:04, 9 March 2023

VTOL | Rank 6 USA
AV-8A Harrier Pack
uk_challenger_2e.png
GarageImage Challenger 2E.jpg
Challenger 2E
AB RB SB
11.7 11.7 11.7
Class:
Research:200 000 Specs-Card-Exp.png
Purchase:1 100 000 Specs-Card-Lion.png
Show in game

Description

The Challenger 2E is a rank VIII British medium tank with a battle rating of 11.7 (AB/RB/SB). It was introduced in Update "Sky Guardians".

The Challenger 2E is a return to tradition in the Challenger 2 Family, a far more conventional vehicle when compared to the Challenger 2 TES or the Black Night. Unlike the other versions of the Challenger 2, it was aimed at the export market, although it failed to receive any orders.

When compared to the other versions of the Challenger 2, it has a substantially more powerful engine, bringing it in-line with many of its international competitors.

General info

Survivability and armour

Composite armour
Balanced protection against all types of ammunition
Smoke grenades
Creation of a smoke screen in front of the vehicle
ESS
Creation of a smoke screen in the direction of movement of the vehicle
Armourfront / side / back
Hull130 / 38 / 50
Turret270 / 90 / 58
Crew4 people
Visibility88 %

Like all Challenger 2 tanks, the armour is exceptional. It is capable of defeating even the most powerful of APFSDS rounds when hull-down, and it can even withstand HEAT rounds to the sides. Nonetheless, it has a few weak spots, particularly the cannon breech and the lower glacis.

The armour profile of the Challenger 2E is practically identical to all other Challenger 2 tanks, so there should be no difficulty in adapting from its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Challenger 2E lacks any additional armour packages, and does not have access to an active protection system, leaving it marginally more vulnerable than all other Challenger 2 variants.

Armour type:

  • Rolled homogeneous armour
  • Cast homogeneous armour
  • Composite armour
  • Structural steel
  • Gun steel
  • Rubber-fabric screens
Armour Front (Slope angle) Sides (Slope angle) Rear (Slope angle) Roof (Slope angle)
Hull 38-50 mm (60-83°) Upper Glacis

70 mm (28°) Lower Glacis

60 mm (0-83°) Driver's Port

25 mm (71°) Top

25 mm (0°) Middle

38 mm (14°) Bottom

50 mm (29-65°) 10-20 mm (79-90°)
Turret 100 mm (50°) Turret Cheeks

30 mm (13-50°) Gun Mantlet

10-20 mm (8-10°) 20 mm (18°) 10-38 mm (75-90°)
Cupola 60 mm (0°) 60 mm (0°) 60 mm (0°) 44 mm (90°)

Notes:

  • There are two 50 mm RHA plates on the Turret Cheeks leading to a total of 100 mm.
  • Negligible structural steel surrounds the hull.
  • There is a 38 mm thick set of cast steel armour in the turrets crew compartment.
Composite Armour Front (Slope angle) Sides (Slope angle)
Hull 130 mm RHA + 200 mm NERA
Turret 160 mm RHA + 400 mm NERA + 110 mm CHA 80 mm RHA + 230 mm NERA

Notes:

  • RHA = rolled homogeneous armour
  • CHA = cast homogeneous armour
  • NERA = non-explosive reactive armour

Mobility

Speedforward / back
AB80 / 39 km/h
RB and SB72 / 35 km/h
Number of gears10 forward
6 back
Weight62.5 t
Engine power
AB2 862 hp
RB and SB1 500 hp
Power-to-weight ratio
AB45.8 hp/t
RB and SB24.0 hp/t

The Challenger 2E has improved mobility when compared to all other Challenger 2 variants. This is due to its superior MTU engine, which replaces the comparatively underpowered Perkins CV12-6A used on all other Challenger 2 tanks.

The MTU engine is about 20% more powerful than the Perkins CV12-6A.

The improved mobility of the Challenger 2E makes it comparable to most other top-tier MBTs, such as the Leopard 2A6 or M1A2 SEP.

Game Mode Max Speed (km/h) Weight (tons) Engine power (horsepower) Power-to-weight ratio (hp/ton)
Forward Reverse Stock Upgraded Stock Upgraded
Arcade 80 39 62.5 2,325 2,862 37.2 45.79
Realistic 72 35 1,327 1,500 21.23 24

Modifications and economy

Repair costBasic → Reference
AB4 446 → 7 020 Sl icon.png
RB4 309 → 6 803 Sl icon.png
SB5 453 → 8 610 Sl icon.png
Total cost of modifications298 100 Rp icon.png
485 000 Sl icon.png
Talisman cost3 200 Ge icon.png
Crew training310 000 Sl icon.png
Experts1 100 000 Sl icon.png
Aces2 300 Ge icon.png
Research Aces1 350 000 Rp icon.png
Reward for battleAB / RB / SB
160 / 200 / 210 % Sl icon.png
256 / 256 / 256 % Rp icon.png
Modifications
Mobility Protection Firepower
Mods new tank traks.png
Tracks
Research:
13 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
20 000 Sl icon.png
310 Ge icon.png
Mods new tank suspension.png
Suspension
Research:
14 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
21 000 Sl icon.png
340 Ge icon.png
Mods new tank break.png
Brake System
Research:
14 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
21 000 Sl icon.png
340 Ge icon.png
Mods new tank filter.png
Filters
Research:
20 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
31 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mods new tank transmission.png
Transmission
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
410 Ge icon.png
Mods new tank engine.png
Engine
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
410 Ge icon.png
Mods tank tool kit.png
Improved Parts
Research:
3 900 Rp icon.png
Cost:
20 000 Sl icon.png
310 Ge icon.png
Mods extinguisher.png
Improved FPE
Research:
4 200 Rp icon.png
Cost:
21 000 Sl icon.png
340 Ge icon.png
Mods tank reinforcement uk.png
Crew Replenishment
Research:
20 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
31 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mods engine smoke screen system.png
ESS
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
410 Ge icon.png
Mods new tank horizontal aiming.png
Horizontal Drive
Research:
13 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
20 000 Sl icon.png
310 Ge icon.png
Mods tank ammo.png
120mm_britain_Smoke_ammo_pack
Research:
13 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
20 000 Sl icon.png
310 Ge icon.png
Mods tank ammo.png
120mm_britain_L26_APDSFS_ammo_pack
Research:
13 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
20 000 Sl icon.png
310 Ge icon.png
Mods tank cannon.png
Adjustment of Fire
Research:
14 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
21 000 Sl icon.png
340 Ge icon.png
Mods thermal sight.png
NVD
Research:
14 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
21 000 Sl icon.png
340 Ge icon.png
Mods new tank vertical aiming.png
Elevation Mechanism
Research:
20 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
31 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mods smoke screen.png
Smoke grenade
Research:
20 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
31 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mods tank laser rangefinder.png
Laser rangefinder
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
410 Ge icon.png
Mods tank ammo.png
120mm_britain_L27_APDSFS_ammo_pack
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
410 Ge icon.png
Mods art support.png
Artillery Support
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
410 Ge icon.png

Armaments

Laser rangefinder
Reduces the error and increases the maximum measurable distance of the rangefinder
Night vision device
Improves visibility by enhancing natural light or active illumination.
Thermal imager
Allows to see thermal radiation in the infrared range day and night

Main armament

Two-plane stabilizer
Reduces the swing of the gun in two planes while moving
Ammunition50 rounds
First-order4 rounds
Reloadbasic crew → aces
6.5 → 5.0 s
Vertical guidance-10° / 20°
Main article: L30A1 (120 mm)

The Challenger 2E mounts the same cannon as all other Challenger 2 tanks in War Thunder. It performs adequately, although some other nations have more capable cannons on their top-tier MBTs. Unlike most MBT cannons at this battle rating, it is rifled. This is to accommodate the HESH ammunition that is highly regarded in British tank doctrine.

The L30A1 is incredibly accurate, although this isn't a unique characteristic for highly rated tanks. The range of ammunition it fires is likewise, good, but nothing special. This is especially damning considering the comparatively limited ammunition selection versus other nation's tanks; the Challenger 2E doesn't have access to HEATFS, HE-VT, or ATGM ammunition.

Where it really shines, however, is it's immense rate of fire. The Challenger 2E - like its predecessors - share the joint title of the fastest 120 mm non-autoloading cannon in War Thunder. The Challenger 2E has one of the fastest firing cannons of any top-tier tank, and can deal out damage at a near absurd rate. With an untrained crew, it has a reload time of 6.5 seconds, however this drops down to an astonishing 5 seconds with an aced crew, lending it a fire rate of 12 rounds per minute.

120 mm L30A1 Turret rotation speed (°/s) Reloading rate (seconds)
Mode Capacity Vertical Horizontal Stabilizer Stock Upgraded Full Expert Aced Stock Full Expert Aced
Arcade 50 -10°/+20° ±180° Two-plane 29.5 40.8 49.6 54.8 58.4 6.50 5.75 5.30 5.00
Realistic 18.4 21.7 26.4 29.1 31.0

Ammunition

Penetration statistics
Ammunition Type of
warhead
Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm)
10 m 100 m 500 m 1,000 m 1,500 m 2,000 m
Shot L23A1 APFSDS 396 394 387 376 367 357
Shell L31A7 HESH 152 152 152 152 152 152
L26 APFSDS 493 491 487 481 474 468
L27A1 APFSDS 564 562 557 551 545 538
Shell details
Ammunition Type of
warhead
Velocity
(m/s)
Projectile
mass (kg)
Fuse delay
(m)
Fuse sensitivity
(mm)
Explosive mass
(TNT equivalent) (kg)
Ricochet
0% 50% 100%
Shot L23A1 APFSDS 1,535 3.89 - - - 78° 80° 81°
Shell L31A7 HESH 670 17.34 0.1 4 6.53 73° 77° 80°
L26 APFSDS 1,650 4.3 - - - 78° 80° 81°
L27A1 APFSDS 1,650 4.3 - - - 78° 80° 81°
Smoke shell characteristics
Ammunition Velocity
(m/s)
Projectile
mass (kg)
Screen radius
(m)
Screen deploy
time (s)
Screen hold
time (s)
Explosive mass
(TNT equivalent) (g)
L34 670 17.1 20 5 25 50

Ammo racks

Full
ammo
Ammo

Part

1st
rack empty
2nd
rack empty
3rd
rack empty
4th
rack empty
5th
rack empty
6th
rack empty
7th

rack empty

8th

rack empty

9th

rack empty

Visual

discrepancy

50 Projectiles

Propellants

48 (+2)

45 (+5)

45 (+5)

39 (+11)

43 (+7)

31 (+19)

41 (+9)

22 (+28)

34 (+16)

14 (+36)

29 (+21)

(+45)

(+45)

(+49)

(+46)

 

(+49)

 

No

Machine guns

Ammunition1 000 rounds
Belt capacity200 rounds
Reloadbasic crew → aces
10.4 → 8.0 s
Fire rate575 shots/min
Vertical guidance-10° / 25°
Horizontal guidance-180° / 78°
Ammunition4 000 rounds
Belt capacity2 000 rounds
Reloadbasic crew → aces
10.4 → 8.0 s
Fire rate600 shots/min

The Challenger 2E has access to one 7.62 mm coaxial machine gun, and one 12.7 mm machine gun mounted on the roof. All other Challenger 2 tanks lack a high calibre machine gun, giving this tank increased lethality against enemy aircraft and light vehicles.

12.7 mm M2HB
Mount Capacity (Belt) Fire rate Vertical Horizontal
Pintle 1,000 (200) 650 -10°/+30° ±60°
7.62 mm L94A1
Mount Capacity (Belt) Fire rate Vertical Horizontal
Coaxial 4,000 (2,000) 600 -10°/+20° ±0°

Usage in battles

The Challenger 2E should be used in a near-identical fashion to the other Challenger 2 tanks.

That is to say:

  • Remain at long-range
  • Lock down enemy advances
  • Stay hull-down
  • Do not rush in, play patiently
  • If advancing, stick with the team

Although, the Challenger 2E has substantially improved mobility, so it can be used more aggressively. Players are at liberty to decide how they control this tank far more than its other iterations. However, one must be aware of their positioning relative to the team. Stray too far ahead with that great engine power, and you risk over-extending and becoming isolated, only to be swarmed by enemy tanks.

Nonetheless, this is still ill-advised. The Challenger 2E has an advantage over most enemies at long-range. While the tank can be used aggressively, this throws away the advantage. While it doesn't put you at substantially increased risk, you are not as capable as you could be.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Very survivable armour profile
  • Advanced fire-control system
  • Adequate firepower
    • Overwhelming rate of fire
  • Competitive mobility

Cons:

  • Large and vulnerable weak spots
  • Minimal anti-air capabilities
  • Lacks APS

History

The Challenger 2E was a private venture by Vickers plc, aimed at the export market. The 2E was designed after the failure of the Challenger 2 to gain international sales, with only 38 being sold.

The Challenger 2E was marketed as being a high-end and capable tank that would outperform all competition, unlike the budget series of the Vickers family. The primary target for the 2E was the gulf nations, as well as several Mediterranean nations. Adjustments were made to the basic Challenger 2 to accommodate these potential markets, such as native integration of air filtration and air conditioning.

Additionally, space was freed up in the crew compartment to accommodate an internal toilet, one of the only tanks in history to do so.

Unfortunately for Vickers, the Challenger 2E was a failure, and did not attract any orders. This was one of many contributing factors that led Vickers plc to go under, eventually being folded into BAE Systems.

One reason for the failure of the Challenger 2E was the reluctance of the British government to sell the Challenger 2E to foreign countries, due to the immensely classified nature of its Chobham armour profile. Were relations to sour between Britain and the prospective buyer, or were the Challenger 2E to be captured by an enemy state, the exact armour profile of the Challenger 2 could be calculated - and perhaps even reverse engineered.

This was especially concerning given the sheer number of tanks using Chobham armour - not only d

Additionally, the Challenger 2E performed rather poorly in the 1998 Greek tank trials, irreparably damaging its reputation.

By 2005, the Challenger 2E project was entirely abandoned by BAE systems.

Media

Skins

See also

Other Challenger 2 tanks

Analogues in other nations

External links


Britain medium tanks
Valentine  Valentine I · Valentine IX · Valentine XI
Cromwell  Cromwell I · Cromwell V · Cromwell V (RP-3)
Cromwell derivatives  Challenger · Avenger · Comet I · Comet I "Iron Duke IV" · Charioteer Mk VII
Centurion  Centurion Mk 1 · Centurion Mk.2 · Centurion Mk 3 · Centurion Mk.5 AVRE · Centurion Mk 10 · Centurion Action X · FV4202
Vickers MBT  Vickers Mk.1 · Vickers Mk.3 · Vickers Mk.7
Chieftain  Chieftain Mk 3 · Chieftain Mk 5 · Chieftain Mk 10
Challenger 1  Challenger Mk.2 · Challenger Mk.3 · Challenger DS
Challenger 2  Challenger 2 · Challenger 2 (2F) · Challenger 2 TES · Challenger 2 OES · Challenger 2E · Challenger 2 Black Night
Challenger 3  Challenger 3 TD
Australia  A.C.I · A.C.IV · Centurion Mk.5/1
South Africa  Olifant Mk.1A · Olifant Mk.2 · TTD
India  Vijayanta · Bhishma TWMP
Israel  ▄Sho't Kal Dalet
Jordan  Khalid
Sweden  ▄Strv 81 (RB 52)
USA  Grant I · Sherman II · Sherman Firefly · Sherman IC "Trzyniec"