Difference between revisions of "Challenger 2E"
(Created page) |
(completed the article) (Tag: Visual edit) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<!-- ''In the description, the first part should be about the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle, as well as its key features. In the second part, tell the reader about the ground vehicle in the game. Insert a screenshot of the vehicle, so that if the novice player does not remember the vehicle by name, he will immediately understand what kind of vehicle the article is talking about.'' --> | <!-- ''In the description, the first part should be about the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle, as well as its key features. In the second part, tell the reader about the ground vehicle in the game. Insert a screenshot of the vehicle, so that if the novice player does not remember the vehicle by name, he will immediately understand what kind of vehicle the article is talking about.'' --> | ||
The '''{{Specs|name}}''' is a rank {{Specs|rank}} British medium tank {{Battle-rating}}. It was introduced in [[Update "Sky Guardians"]]. | The '''{{Specs|name}}''' is a rank {{Specs|rank}} British medium tank {{Battle-rating}}. It was introduced in [[Update "Sky Guardians"]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Challenger 2E is a return to tradition in the Challenger 2 Family, a far more conventional vehicle when compared to the [[Challenger 2 TES]] or the [[Black Night]]. Unlike the other versions of the Challenger 2, it was aimed at the export market, although it failed to receive any orders. | ||
+ | |||
+ | When compared to the other versions of the Challenger 2, it has a substantially more powerful engine, bringing it in-line with many of its international competitors. | ||
== General info == | == General info == | ||
Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
{{Specs-Tank-Armour}} | {{Specs-Tank-Armour}} | ||
<!-- ''Describe armour protection. Note the most well protected and key weak areas. Appreciate the layout of modules as well as the number and location of crew members. Is the level of armour protection sufficient, is the placement of modules helpful for survival in combat? If necessary use a visual template to indicate the most secure and weak zones of the armour.'' --> | <!-- ''Describe armour protection. Note the most well protected and key weak areas. Appreciate the layout of modules as well as the number and location of crew members. Is the level of armour protection sufficient, is the placement of modules helpful for survival in combat? If necessary use a visual template to indicate the most secure and weak zones of the armour.'' --> | ||
− | + | Like all Challenger 2 tanks, the armour is exceptional. It is capable of defeating even the most powerful of APFSDS rounds when hull-down, and it can even withstand HEAT rounds to the sides. Nonetheless, it has a few weak spots, particularly the cannon breech and the lower glacis. | |
+ | |||
+ | The armour profile of the Challenger 2E is practically identical to all other Challenger 2 tanks, so there should be no difficulty in adapting from its predecessors. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Furthermore, the Challenger 2E lacks any additional armour packages, and does not have access to an [[Active protection systems|active protection system]], leaving it marginally more vulnerable than all other Challenger 2 variants. | ||
'''Armour type:''' <!-- The types of armour present on the vehicle and their general locations --> | '''Armour type:''' <!-- The types of armour present on the vehicle and their general locations --> | ||
<!-- Example: * Rolled homogeneous armour (Front, Side, Rear, Hull roof) | <!-- Example: * Rolled homogeneous armour (Front, Side, Rear, Hull roof) | ||
* Cast homogeneous armour (Turret, Transmission area) --> | * Cast homogeneous armour (Turret, Transmission area) --> | ||
+ | * Rolled homogeneous armour | ||
+ | * Cast homogeneous armour | ||
+ | * Composite armour | ||
+ | * Structural steel | ||
+ | * Gun steel | ||
+ | * Rubber-fabric screens | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! Armour !! Front (Slope angle) !! Sides !! Rear !! Roof | + | !'''Armour'''!!'''Front (Slope angle)'''!!'''Sides (Slope angle)'''!!'''Rear (Slope angle)'''!!'''Roof (Slope angle)''' |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Hull | | + | |Hull |
+ | |38-50 mm (60-83°) Upper Glacis | ||
+ | |||
+ | 70 mm (28°) Lower Glacis | ||
+ | |||
+ | 60 mm (0-83°) Driver's Port | ||
+ | |25 mm (71°) Top | ||
+ | |||
+ | 25 mm (0°) Middle | ||
+ | |||
+ | 38 mm (14°) Bottom | ||
+ | |50 mm (29-65°) | ||
+ | |10-20 mm (79-90°) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Turret | | + | |Turret |
+ | |100 mm (50°) Turret Cheeks | ||
+ | |||
+ | 30 mm (13-50°) Gun Mantlet | ||
+ | |10-20 mm (8-10°) | ||
+ | |20 mm (18°) | ||
+ | |10-38 mm (75-90°) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Cupola | | + | |Cupola |
+ | |60 mm (0°) | ||
+ | |60 mm (0°) | ||
+ | |60 mm (0°) | ||
+ | |44 mm (90°) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 32: | Line 68: | ||
'''Notes:''' <!-- Any additional notes which the user needs to be aware of --> | '''Notes:''' <!-- Any additional notes which the user needs to be aware of --> | ||
<!-- Example: * Suspension wheels are 20 mm thick, tracks are 30 mm thick, and torsion bars are 60 mm thick. --> | <!-- Example: * Suspension wheels are 20 mm thick, tracks are 30 mm thick, and torsion bars are 60 mm thick. --> | ||
+ | * There are two 50 mm RHA plates on the Turret Cheeks leading to a total of 100 mm. | ||
+ | * Negligible structural steel surrounds the hull. | ||
+ | * There is a 38 mm thick set of cast steel armour in the turrets crew compartment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||
+ | !'''Composite Armour''' | ||
+ | !'''Front (Slope angle)''' | ||
+ | !'''Sides (Slope angle)''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Hull | ||
+ | |130 mm RHA + 200 mm NERA | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Turret | ||
+ | |160 mm RHA + 400 mm NERA + 110 mm CHA | ||
+ | |80 mm RHA + 230 mm NERA | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | '''Notes:'''<!-- Any additional notes which the user needs to be aware of --> | ||
+ | <!-- Example: * Suspension wheels are 20 mm thick, tracks are 30 mm thick, and torsion bars are 60 mm thick. --> | ||
+ | * RHA = rolled homogeneous armour | ||
+ | * CHA = cast homogeneous armour | ||
+ | * NERA = non-explosive reactive armour | ||
=== Mobility === | === Mobility === | ||
{{Specs-Tank-Mobility}} | {{Specs-Tank-Mobility}} | ||
<!-- ''Write about the mobility of the ground vehicle. Estimate the specific power and manoeuvrability, as well as the maximum speed forwards and backwards.'' --> | <!-- ''Write about the mobility of the ground vehicle. Estimate the specific power and manoeuvrability, as well as the maximum speed forwards and backwards.'' --> | ||
− | + | The Challenger 2E has improved mobility when compared to all other Challenger 2 variants. This is due to its superior MTU engine, which replaces the comparatively underpowered Perkins CV12-6A used on all other Challenger 2 tanks. | |
+ | |||
+ | The MTU engine is about 20% more powerful than the Perkins CV12-6A. | ||
− | {{tankMobility}} | + | The improved mobility of the Challenger 2E makes it comparable to most other top-tier MBTs, such as the [[Leopard 2A6]] or [[M1A2 SEP]].{{tankMobility|abMinHp=2,325|rbMinHp=1,327}} |
=== Modifications and economy === | === Modifications and economy === | ||
Line 50: | Line 110: | ||
{{main|L30A1 (120 mm)}} | {{main|L30A1 (120 mm)}} | ||
− | + | The Challenger 2E mounts the same cannon as all other Challenger 2 tanks in War Thunder. It performs adequately, although some other nations have more capable cannons on their top-tier MBTs. Unlike most MBT cannons at this battle rating, it is rifled. This is to accommodate the HESH ammunition that is highly regarded in British tank doctrine. | |
+ | The L30A1 is incredibly accurate, although this isn't a unique characteristic for highly rated tanks. The range of ammunition it fires is likewise, good, but nothing special. This is especially damning considering the comparatively limited ammunition selection versus other nation's tanks; the Challenger 2E doesn't have access to HEATFS, HE-VT, or ATGM ammunition. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where it really shines, however, is it's immense rate of fire. The Challenger 2E - like its predecessors - share the joint title of the fastest 120 mm non-autoloading cannon in War Thunder. The Challenger 2E has one of the fastest firing cannons of any top-tier tank, and can deal out damage at a near absurd rate. With an untrained crew, it has a reload time of 6.5 seconds, however this drops down to an astonishing 5 seconds with an aced crew, lending it a fire rate of 12 rounds per minute. | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="100%" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="100%" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! colspan="5" | [[L30A1 (120 mm)|120 mm L30A1]] || colspan="5" | Turret rotation speed (°/s) || colspan="4" | Reloading rate (seconds) | + | ! colspan="5" | [[L30A1 (120 mm)|'''120 mm L30A1''']] || colspan="5" | '''Turret rotation speed (°/s)''' || colspan="4" | '''Reloading rate (seconds)''' |
|- | |- | ||
− | ! Mode !! Capacity !! Vertical !! Horizontal !! Stabilizer | + | ! '''Mode''' !! '''Capacity''' !! '''Vertical''' !! '''Horizontal''' !! '''Stabilizer''' |
− | ! Stock !! Upgraded !! Full !! Expert !! Aced | + | ! '''Stock''' !! '''Upgraded''' !! '''Full''' !! '''Expert''' !! '''Aced''' |
− | ! Stock !! Full !! Expert !! Aced | + | ! '''Stock''' !! '''Full''' !! '''Expert''' !! '''Aced''' |
|- | |- | ||
− | ! ''Arcade'' | + | ! '''''Arcade''''' |
− | | rowspan="2" | 50 || rowspan="2" | -10°/+20° || rowspan="2" | ±180° || rowspan="2" | Two-plane || | + | | rowspan="2" | 50 || rowspan="2" | -10°/+20° || rowspan="2" | ±180° || rowspan="2" | Two-plane ||29.5||40.8||49.6||54.8||58.4|| rowspan="2" |6.50|| rowspan="2" |5.75|| rowspan="2" |5.30|| rowspan="2" |5.00 |
|- | |- | ||
− | ! ''Realistic'' | + | ! '''''Realistic''''' |
− | | | + | |18.4||21.7||26.4||29.1||31.0 |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 76: | Line 139: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! Full<br>ammo | + | ! '''Full<br>ammo''' |
− | ! 1st<br>rack empty | + | !'''Ammo''' |
− | ! 2nd<br>rack empty | + | '''Part''' |
− | ! 3rd<br>rack empty | + | ! '''1st<br>rack empty''' |
− | ! 4th<br>rack empty | + | ! '''2nd<br>rack empty''' |
− | ! 5th<br>rack empty | + | ! '''3rd<br>rack empty''' |
− | ! 6th<br>rack empty | + | ! '''4th<br>rack empty''' |
− | ! Visual | + | ! '''5th<br>rack empty''' |
+ | ! '''6th<br>rack empty''' | ||
+ | !'''7th''' | ||
+ | '''rack empty''' | ||
+ | !'''8th''' | ||
+ | '''rack empty''' | ||
+ | !'''9th''' | ||
+ | '''rack empty''' | ||
+ | !'''Visual''' | ||
+ | '''discrepancy''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''50''' || | + | |'''50''' |
+ | |''Projectiles'' | ||
+ | ''Propellants'' | ||
+ | |48 ''(+2)'' | ||
+ | 45 ''(+5)'' | ||
+ | |45 ''(+5)'' | ||
+ | 39 ''(+11)'' | ||
+ | |43 ''(+7)'' | ||
+ | 31 ''(+19)'' | ||
+ | |41 ''(+9)'' | ||
+ | 22 ''(+28)'' | ||
+ | |34 ''(+16)'' | ||
+ | 14 ''(+36)'' | ||
+ | |29 ''(+21)'' | ||
+ | 5 ''(+45)'' | ||
+ | |5 ''(+45)'' | ||
+ | 1 ''(+49)'' | ||
+ | |4 ''(+46)'' | ||
+ | | ||
+ | |1 ''(+49)'' | ||
+ | | ||
+ | |No | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 95: | Line 188: | ||
{{main|M2HB (12.7 mm)|L94A1 (7.62 mm)}} | {{main|M2HB (12.7 mm)|L94A1 (7.62 mm)}} | ||
− | + | The Challenger 2E has access to one 7.62 mm coaxial machine gun, and one 12.7 mm machine gun mounted on the roof. All other Challenger 2 tanks lack a high calibre machine gun, giving this tank increased lethality against enemy aircraft and light vehicles. | |
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="50%" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="50%" | ||
Line 103: | Line 196: | ||
! Mount !! Capacity (Belt) !! Fire rate !! Vertical !! Horizontal | ! Mount !! Capacity (Belt) !! Fire rate !! Vertical !! Horizontal | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || | + | |Pintle||1,000 (200)||650||-10°/+30°||±60° |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 112: | Line 205: | ||
! Mount !! Capacity (Belt) !! Fire rate !! Vertical !! Horizontal | ! Mount !! Capacity (Belt) !! Fire rate !! Vertical !! Horizontal | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || | + | |Coaxial||4,000 (2,000)||600||-10°/+20°||±0° |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Usage in battles == | == Usage in battles == | ||
− | <!-- ''Describe the tactics of playing in the vehicle, the features of using vehicles in the team and advice on tactics. Refrain from creating a "guide" - do not impose a single point of view but instead give the reader food for thought. Describe the most dangerous enemies and give recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of the game in different modes (AB, RB, SB).'' --> | + | <!-- ''Describe the tactics of playing in the vehicle, the features of using vehicles in the team and advice on tactics. Refrain from creating a "guide" - do not impose a single point of view but instead give the reader food for thought. Describe the most dangerous enemies and give recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of the game in different modes (AB, RB, SB).'' -->The Challenger 2E should be used in a near-identical fashion to the other Challenger 2 tanks. |
− | + | ||
+ | That is to say: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Remain at long-range | ||
+ | * Lock down enemy advances | ||
+ | * Stay hull-down | ||
+ | * Do not rush in, play patiently | ||
+ | * If advancing, stick with the team | ||
+ | |||
+ | Although, the Challenger 2E has substantially improved mobility, so it can be used more aggressively. Players are at liberty to decide how they control this tank far more than its other iterations. However, one must be aware of their positioning relative to the team. Stray too far ahead with that great engine power, and you risk over-extending and becoming isolated, only to be swarmed by enemy tanks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Nonetheless, this is still ill-advised. The Challenger 2E has an advantage over most enemies at long-range. While the tank can be used aggressively, this throws away the advantage. While it doesn't put you at substantially increased risk, you are not as capable as you could be. | ||
=== Pros and cons === | === Pros and cons === | ||
<!-- ''Summarise and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in a bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - use substitutions with softer forms such as "inadequate" and "effective".'' --> | <!-- ''Summarise and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in a bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - use substitutions with softer forms such as "inadequate" and "effective".'' --> | ||
− | '' | + | '''Pros:''' |
+ | |||
+ | * Very survivable armour profile | ||
+ | * Advanced fire-control system | ||
+ | ** Modern [[Night Vision Devices|NVDs]] | ||
+ | * Adequate firepower | ||
+ | ** Overwhelming rate of fire | ||
+ | * Competitive mobility | ||
− | |||
* | * | ||
'''Cons:''' | '''Cons:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Large and vulnerable weak spots | ||
+ | * Minimal anti-air capabilities | ||
+ | * Lacks [[Active protection systems|APS]] | ||
+ | |||
* | * | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
<!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).'' --> | <!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).'' --> | ||
− | + | The Challenger 2E was a private venture by [[wikipedia:Vickers_plc|Vickers plc]], aimed at the export market. The 2E was designed after the failure of the Challenger 2 to gain international sales, with only 38 being sold. | |
+ | |||
+ | The Challenger 2E was marketed as being a high-end and capable tank that would outperform all competition, unlike the budget series of the [[Vickers MBT (Family)|Vickers family]]. The primary target for the 2E was the gulf nations, as well as several Mediterranean nations. Adjustments were made to the basic Challenger 2 to accommodate these potential markets, such as native integration of air filtration and air conditioning. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Additionally, space was freed up in the crew compartment to accommodate an internal toilet, one of the only tanks in history to do so. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Unfortunately for Vickers, the Challenger 2E was a failure, and did not attract any orders. This was one of many contributing factors that led Vickers plc to go under, eventually being folded into BAE Systems. | ||
+ | |||
+ | One reason for the failure of the Challenger 2E was the reluctance of the British government to sell the Challenger 2E to foreign countries, due to the immensely classified nature of its Chobham armour profile. Were relations to sour between Britain and the prospective buyer, or were the Challenger 2E to be captured by an enemy state, the exact armour profile of the Challenger 2 could be calculated - and perhaps even reverse engineered. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This was especially concerning given the sheer number of tanks using Chobham armour - not only d | ||
+ | |||
+ | Additionally, the Challenger 2E performed rather poorly in the 1998 Greek tank trials, irreparably damaging its reputation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | By 2005, the Challenger 2E project was entirely abandoned by BAE systems. | ||
== Media == | == Media == | ||
<!-- ''Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.'' --> | <!-- ''Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.'' --> | ||
− | '' | + | '''Skins''' |
+ | |||
+ | * [https://live.warthunder.com/feed/camouflages/?vehicle=uk_challenger_2e Skins and camouflages for the Challenger 2E from live.warthunder.com.] | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
<!-- ''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:'' | <!-- ''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:'' | ||
* ''reference to the series of the vehicles;'' | * ''reference to the series of the vehicles;'' | ||
− | * ''links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.'' --> | + | * ''links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.'' -->'''Other Challenger 2 tanks''' |
− | '' | + | |
− | * | + | * [[Challenger 2 (Family)]] |
− | * '' | + | ** [[Challenger 2]] |
+ | ** [[Challenger 2 (2F)]] | ||
+ | ** [[Challenger 2 TES]] | ||
+ | ** [[Black Night]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Analogues in other nations''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[M1 Abrams (Family)]] | ||
+ | ** [[M1A2 Abrams]] | ||
+ | ** [[M1A2 SEP]] | ||
+ | * [[Leopard 2 (Family)]] | ||
+ | ** [[Leopard 2A5]] | ||
+ | ** [[Leopard 2A6]] | ||
+ | * [[Leclerc (Family)]] | ||
+ | ** [[Leclerc]] | ||
+ | ** [[Leclerc S2]] | ||
+ | ** [[Leclerc SXXI]] | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Line 150: | Line 297: | ||
* ''topic on the official game forum;'' | * ''topic on the official game forum;'' | ||
* ''other literature.'' --> | * ''other literature.'' --> | ||
− | + | * [[wikipedia:Challenger_2|[Wikipedia] Challenger 2]] | |
− | * | + | * [[wt:en/news/8108-development-challenger-2e-hurry-up-sir-en|[Development] Challenger 2E - Hurry up, Sir!]] |
− | |||
{{Britain medium tanks}} | {{Britain medium tanks}} |
Revision as of 13:04, 9 March 2023
Contents
Description
The Challenger 2E is a rank VIII British medium tank with a battle rating of 12.0 (AB/RB/SB). It was introduced in Update "Sky Guardians".
The Challenger 2E is a return to tradition in the Challenger 2 Family, a far more conventional vehicle when compared to the Challenger 2 TES or the Black Night. Unlike the other versions of the Challenger 2, it was aimed at the export market, although it failed to receive any orders.
When compared to the other versions of the Challenger 2, it has a substantially more powerful engine, bringing it in-line with many of its international competitors.
General info
Survivability and armour
Like all Challenger 2 tanks, the armour is exceptional. It is capable of defeating even the most powerful of APFSDS rounds when hull-down, and it can even withstand HEAT rounds to the sides. Nonetheless, it has a few weak spots, particularly the cannon breech and the lower glacis.
The armour profile of the Challenger 2E is practically identical to all other Challenger 2 tanks, so there should be no difficulty in adapting from its predecessors.
Furthermore, the Challenger 2E lacks any additional armour packages, and does not have access to an active protection system, leaving it marginally more vulnerable than all other Challenger 2 variants.
Armour type:
- Rolled homogeneous armour
- Cast homogeneous armour
- Composite armour
- Structural steel
- Gun steel
- Rubber-fabric screens
Armour | Front (Slope angle) | Sides (Slope angle) | Rear (Slope angle) | Roof (Slope angle) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hull | 38-50 mm (60-83°) Upper Glacis
70 mm (28°) Lower Glacis 60 mm (0-83°) Driver's Port |
25 mm (71°) Top
25 mm (0°) Middle 38 mm (14°) Bottom |
50 mm (29-65°) | 10-20 mm (79-90°) |
Turret | 100 mm (50°) Turret Cheeks
30 mm (13-50°) Gun Mantlet |
10-20 mm (8-10°) | 20 mm (18°) | 10-38 mm (75-90°) |
Cupola | 60 mm (0°) | 60 mm (0°) | 60 mm (0°) | 44 mm (90°) |
Notes:
- There are two 50 mm RHA plates on the Turret Cheeks leading to a total of 100 mm.
- Negligible structural steel surrounds the hull.
- There is a 38 mm thick set of cast steel armour in the turrets crew compartment.
Composite Armour | Front (Slope angle) | Sides (Slope angle) |
---|---|---|
Hull | 130 mm RHA + 200 mm NERA | |
Turret | 160 mm RHA + 400 mm NERA + 110 mm CHA | 80 mm RHA + 230 mm NERA |
Notes:
- RHA = rolled homogeneous armour
- CHA = cast homogeneous armour
- NERA = non-explosive reactive armour
Mobility
The Challenger 2E has improved mobility when compared to all other Challenger 2 variants. This is due to its superior MTU engine, which replaces the comparatively underpowered Perkins CV12-6A used on all other Challenger 2 tanks.
The MTU engine is about 20% more powerful than the Perkins CV12-6A.
The improved mobility of the Challenger 2E makes it comparable to most other top-tier MBTs, such as the Leopard 2A6 or M1A2 SEP.
Game Mode | Max Speed (km/h) | Weight (tons) | Engine power (horsepower) | Power-to-weight ratio (hp/ton) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forward | Reverse | Stock | Upgraded | Stock | Upgraded | ||
Arcade | 80 | 39 | 62.5 | 2,325 | 2,862 | 37.2 | 45.79 |
Realistic | 72 | 35 | 1,327 | 1,500 | 21.23 | 24 |
Modifications and economy
Armaments
Main armament
The Challenger 2E mounts the same cannon as all other Challenger 2 tanks in War Thunder. It performs adequately, although some other nations have more capable cannons on their top-tier MBTs. Unlike most MBT cannons at this battle rating, it is rifled. This is to accommodate the HESH ammunition that is highly regarded in British tank doctrine.
The L30A1 is incredibly accurate, although this isn't a unique characteristic for highly rated tanks. The range of ammunition it fires is likewise, good, but nothing special. This is especially damning considering the comparatively limited ammunition selection versus other nation's tanks; the Challenger 2E doesn't have access to HEATFS, HE-VT, or ATGM ammunition.
Where it really shines, however, is it's immense rate of fire. The Challenger 2E - like its predecessors - share the joint title of the fastest 120 mm non-autoloading cannon in War Thunder. The Challenger 2E has one of the fastest firing cannons of any top-tier tank, and can deal out damage at a near absurd rate. With an untrained crew, it has a reload time of 6.5 seconds, however this drops down to an astonishing 5 seconds with an aced crew, lending it a fire rate of 12 rounds per minute.
120 mm L30A1 | Turret rotation speed (°/s) | Reloading rate (seconds) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mode | Capacity | Vertical | Horizontal | Stabilizer | Stock | Upgraded | Full | Expert | Aced | Stock | Full | Expert | Aced |
Arcade | 50 | -10°/+20° | ±180° | Two-plane | 29.5 | 40.8 | 49.6 | 54.8 | 58.4 | 6.50 | 5.75 | 5.30 | 5.00 |
Realistic | 18.4 | 21.7 | 26.4 | 29.1 | 31.0 |
Ammunition
Penetration statistics | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm) | |||||
10 m | 100 m | 500 m | 1,000 m | 1,500 m | 2,000 m | ||
Shot L23A1 | APFSDS | 396 | 394 | 387 | 376 | 367 | 357 |
Shell L31A7 | HESH | 152 | 152 | 152 | 152 | 152 | 152 |
L26 | APFSDS | 493 | 491 | 487 | 481 | 474 | 468 |
L27A1 | APFSDS | 564 | 562 | 557 | 551 | 545 | 538 |
Shell details | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Fuse delay (m) |
Fuse sensitivity (mm) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (kg) |
Ricochet | |||||
0% | 50% | 100% | ||||||||||
Shot L23A1 | APFSDS | 1,535 | 3.89 | - | - | - | 78° | 80° | 81° | |||
Shell L31A7 | HESH | 670 | 17.34 | 0.1 | 4 | 6.53 | 73° | 77° | 80° | |||
L26 | APFSDS | 1,650 | 4.3 | - | - | - | 78° | 80° | 81° | |||
L27A1 | APFSDS | 1,650 | 4.3 | - | - | - | 78° | 80° | 81° |
Smoke shell characteristics | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Screen radius (m) |
Screen deploy time (s) |
Screen hold time (s) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (g) |
L34 | 670 | 17.1 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 50 |
Ammo racks
Full ammo |
Ammo
Part |
1st rack empty |
2nd rack empty |
3rd rack empty |
4th rack empty |
5th rack empty |
6th rack empty |
7th
rack empty |
8th
rack empty |
9th
rack empty |
Visual
discrepancy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | Projectiles
Propellants |
48 (+2)
45 (+5) |
45 (+5)
39 (+11) |
43 (+7)
31 (+19) |
41 (+9)
22 (+28) |
34 (+16)
14 (+36) |
29 (+21)
5 (+45) |
5 (+45)
1 (+49) |
4 (+46)
|
1 (+49)
|
No |
Machine guns
The Challenger 2E has access to one 7.62 mm coaxial machine gun, and one 12.7 mm machine gun mounted on the roof. All other Challenger 2 tanks lack a high calibre machine gun, giving this tank increased lethality against enemy aircraft and light vehicles.
12.7 mm M2HB | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mount | Capacity (Belt) | Fire rate | Vertical | Horizontal |
Pintle | 1,000 (200) | 650 | -10°/+30° | ±60° |
7.62 mm L94A1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mount | Capacity (Belt) | Fire rate | Vertical | Horizontal |
Coaxial | 4,000 (2,000) | 600 | -10°/+20° | ±0° |
Usage in battles
The Challenger 2E should be used in a near-identical fashion to the other Challenger 2 tanks.
That is to say:
- Remain at long-range
- Lock down enemy advances
- Stay hull-down
- Do not rush in, play patiently
- If advancing, stick with the team
Although, the Challenger 2E has substantially improved mobility, so it can be used more aggressively. Players are at liberty to decide how they control this tank far more than its other iterations. However, one must be aware of their positioning relative to the team. Stray too far ahead with that great engine power, and you risk over-extending and becoming isolated, only to be swarmed by enemy tanks.
Nonetheless, this is still ill-advised. The Challenger 2E has an advantage over most enemies at long-range. While the tank can be used aggressively, this throws away the advantage. While it doesn't put you at substantially increased risk, you are not as capable as you could be.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Very survivable armour profile
- Advanced fire-control system
- Modern NVDs
- Adequate firepower
- Overwhelming rate of fire
- Competitive mobility
Cons:
- Large and vulnerable weak spots
- Minimal anti-air capabilities
- Lacks APS
History
The Challenger 2E was a private venture by Vickers plc, aimed at the export market. The 2E was designed after the failure of the Challenger 2 to gain international sales, with only 38 being sold.
The Challenger 2E was marketed as being a high-end and capable tank that would outperform all competition, unlike the budget series of the Vickers family. The primary target for the 2E was the gulf nations, as well as several Mediterranean nations. Adjustments were made to the basic Challenger 2 to accommodate these potential markets, such as native integration of air filtration and air conditioning.
Additionally, space was freed up in the crew compartment to accommodate an internal toilet, one of the only tanks in history to do so.
Unfortunately for Vickers, the Challenger 2E was a failure, and did not attract any orders. This was one of many contributing factors that led Vickers plc to go under, eventually being folded into BAE Systems.
One reason for the failure of the Challenger 2E was the reluctance of the British government to sell the Challenger 2E to foreign countries, due to the immensely classified nature of its Chobham armour profile. Were relations to sour between Britain and the prospective buyer, or were the Challenger 2E to be captured by an enemy state, the exact armour profile of the Challenger 2 could be calculated - and perhaps even reverse engineered.
This was especially concerning given the sheer number of tanks using Chobham armour - not only d
Additionally, the Challenger 2E performed rather poorly in the 1998 Greek tank trials, irreparably damaging its reputation.
By 2005, the Challenger 2E project was entirely abandoned by BAE systems.
Media
Skins
See also
Other Challenger 2 tanks
Analogues in other nations
External links
Britain medium tanks | |
---|---|
Valentine | Valentine I · Valentine IX · Valentine XI |
Cromwell | Cromwell I · Cromwell V · Cromwell V (RP-3) |
Cromwell derivatives | Challenger · Avenger · Comet I · Comet I "Iron Duke IV" · Charioteer Mk VII |
Centurion | Centurion Mk 1 · Centurion Mk.2 · Centurion Mk 3 · Centurion Mk.5 AVRE · Centurion Mk 10 · Centurion Action X · FV4202 |
Vickers MBT | Vickers Mk.1 · Vickers Mk.3 · Vickers Mk.7 |
Chieftain | Chieftain Mk 3 · Chieftain Mk 5 · Chieftain Mk 10 |
Challenger 1 | Challenger Mk.2 · Challenger Mk.3 · Challenger DS |
Challenger 2 | Challenger 2 · Challenger 2 (2F) · Challenger 2 TES · Challenger 2 OES · Challenger 2E · Challenger 2 Black Night |
Challenger 3 | Challenger 3 TD |
Australia | A.C.I · A.C.IV · Centurion Mk.5/1 |
South Africa | Olifant Mk.1A · Olifant Mk.2 · TTD |
India | Vijayanta · Bhishma TWMP |
Israel | ▄Sho't Kal Dalet |
Jordan | Khalid |
Sweden | ▄Strv 81 (RB 52) |
USA | Grant I · Sherman II · Sherman Firefly · Sherman IC "Trzyniec" |
- Ground vehicles
- Britain ground vehicles
- Eighth rank ground vehicles
- Medium tanks
- Ground vehicles with composite armour
- Ground vehicles with smoke grenades
- Ground vehicles with engine smoke generating system
- Ground vehicles with night vision device
- Ground vehicles with thermal sight
- Ground vehicles with gun stabilizer