Type 74 (F)

This page is about the Japanese medium tank Type 74 (F). For other versions, see Type 74 (Family).

Type 74 (F)

Type 74 (E)

Type 90

Type 74 (F)

Type 74 (E)

Type 90

Japan

VI Rank

Battle rating:

AB	RB	SB
9.0	9.0	9.0

Class:

Medium tank

Research:110 000

Purchase:620 000

Show in game

Description

The Type 74 (F) (74式戦車F型) is the final minor upgrade of the Type 74 MBT series, which added mounting plates to the hull for the Type 92 Mine-Roller.

It was introduced in Update "New Power". It offers the same features as its predecessor (Type 74 (E)), except for the additional thin plates on the front of the hull and the absence of a dozer blade option. It can use APFSDS ammunition, which combined with its laser rangefinder and hydropneumatic suspension system that enables it to adjust its hull height and angle, which makes it a suitable sniping vehicle.

General info

Survivability and armour

Smoke grenades

Creation of a smoke screen in front of the vehicle

Armourfront / side / back

Hull80 / 30 / 20

Turret132 / 67 / 37

Crew4 people

Visibility96 %

Armour type:

• Rolled homogeneous armour
• Cast homogeneous armour (Gun mantlet)

Armour	Front (Slope angle)	Sides	Rear	Roof
Hull	40 mm (74°), 80 mm (65°) Front glacis 80 mm (57°) Lower glacis	35 mm (44°) Top 30 mm, 10 mm (55-56°) Bottom	20 mm Top 25 mm (47-48°) Bottom	25 mm
Turret	132 mm (27-53°) Turret front 200 mm (34-73°) , 150 + 170 mm (0-44°) Gun mantlet	132 mm (5-57°) Front 67 mm (37-47°) Rear	37 mm (17-39°)	67 mm Front 37 mm Rear
Cupola	80 mm			80 mm

Notes:

• Suspension wheels and tracks are both 20 mm thick.
• Has additional 10 mm mounting plates scattered on the front hull
• The Type 74's hydropneumatic suspension means it could vary the sloped angle of its armour towards the enemy.
• Hull roof is rated to be 25 mm effective against HE.

As with most medium tanks of the rank, the hull of the Type 74 (F) is only capable of stopping some autocannon fire and has very vulnerable sides, however, the turret armour of the Type 74 (F) is closer to US and British turret armour level. While it's unlikely to stop most APFSDS, it is very likely to deflect stray APDS and APHE. Light tanks will likely have to get close and personal to penetrate it, as penetrating cupola even with APDS belt is a challenge due to its size.

The advantage can be kept even when creeping onto the enemy high ground by using hydropneumatic suspension before driving uphill to not allow the enemy to fire at the roof. In rare cases, the tank can "duck" behind cover to hide at least a portion of the turret from enemy fire.

Mobility

 

Controlled suspension

It is possible to adjust the ground clearance or more complex suspension positions

Speedforward / back

AB59 / 9 km/h

RB and SB54 / 8 km/h

Number of gears6 forward

1 back

Weight38.0 t

Engine power

AB1 660 hp

RB and SB870 hp

Power-to-weight ratio

AB43.7 hp/t

RB and SB22.9 hp/t

Game Mode	Max Speed (km/h)		Weight (tons)	Engine power (horsepower)		Power-to-weight ratio (hp/ton)
	Forward	Reverse		Stock	Upgraded	Stock	Upgraded
Arcade	59	9	38	1,348	1,660	35.47	43.68
Realistic	54	8		769	870	20.24	22.89

Modifications and economy

Repair costBasic → Reference

AB4 610 → 6 361

RB4 777 → 6 592

SB5 910 → 8 155

Total cost of modifications183 100

306 000

Talisman cost2 700

Crew training175 000

Experts620 000

Aces2 100

Research Aces1 010 000

Reward for battleAB / RB / SB

150 / 210 / 250 %

226 / 226 / 226 %

Modifications

Mobility	Protection	Firepower
Tracks Research: 9 800 Cost: 15 000 340 Suspension Research: 8 800 Cost: 14 000 300 Brake System Research: 8 800 Cost: 14 000 300 Filters Research: 12 000 Cost: 19 000 410 Transmission Research: 13 000 Cost: 20 000 450 Engine Research: 13 000 Cost: 20 000 450	Improved Parts Research: 2 900 Cost: 15 000 340 Improved FPE Research: 2 600 Cost: 14 000 300 Crew Replenishment Research: 12 000 Cost: 19 000 410 Smoke grenade Research: 13 000 Cost: 20 000 450	Horizontal Drive Research: 9 800 Cost: 15 000 340 105mm_NATO_APDS_FS_ammo_pack Research: 9 800 Cost: 15 000 340 Adjustment of Fire Research: 8 800 Cost: 14 000 300 Laser rangefinder Research: 8 800 Cost: 14 000 300 Elevation Mechanism Research: 12 000 Cost: 19 000 410 105mm_us_M416_Smoke_ammo_pack Research: 12 000 Cost: 19 000 410 Artillery Support Research: 13 000 Cost: 20 000 450 105mm_jp_Type93_APDS_FS_ammo_pack Research: 13 000 Cost: 20 000 450

Armaments

Laser rangefinder

Reduces the error and increases the maximum measurable distance of the rangefinder

Main armament

105 mm L7A3 cannon

Two-plane stabilizer

Reduces the swing of the gun in two planes while moving

Ammunition50 rounds

First-order16 rounds

Reloadbasic crew → aces

8.7 → 6.7 s

Vertical guidance-6° / 9°

While the 105 mm gun is relatively equal to one of other nations, the ammunition and optics of the Type 74 (F) are exceptional. It has all the same shell types of NATO tanks. The Type 74 (F) also has a laser rangefinder, which makes it really easy to check aim in RB, compared to tanks it fights in down-tiers and sometimes even in up-tier. The gun depression is the only real disadvantage, forcing operator to use hydropneumatic suspension. Main issue is that if chassis got damaged while tank was shifting, it will refuse to work and tank might get stuck in awkward pose, being unable to aim at opponents, however usually enemies aim to kill instead of just disabling the Type 74 (F).

105 mm L7A3					Turret rotation speed (°/s)					Reloading rate (seconds)
Mode	Capacity	Vertical	Horizontal	Stabilizer	Stock	Upgraded	Full	Expert	Aced	Stock	Full	Expert	Aced
Arcade	50	-6°/+9°	±180°	Two-plane	22.8	31.6	38.4	42.5	45.2	8.71	7.70	7.10	6.70
Realistic					14.3	16.8	20.4	22.6	24.0

Ammunition

Penetration statistics
Ammunition	Type of warhead	Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm)
		10 m	100 m	500 m	1,000 m	1,500 m	2,000 m
Type 91	HEATFS	400	400	400	400	400	400
M735	APFSDS	292	291	284	275	266	257
Type 93	APFSDS	405	403	396	388	378	370

Shell details
Ammunition	Type of warhead	Velocity (m/s)	Projectile mass (kg)	Fuse delay (m)	Fuse sensitivity (mm)	Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (kg)	Ricochet
							0%	50%	100%
Type 91	HEATFS	1,150	9.4	0.05	0.1	1.57	65°	72°	77°
M735	APFSDS	1,501	3.72	-	-	-	78°	80°	81°
Type 93	APFSDS	1,501	3.4	-	-	-	78°	80°	81°

Smoke shell characteristics
Ammunition	Velocity (m/s)	Projectile mass (kg)	Screen radius (m)	Screen deploy time (s)	Screen hold time (s)	Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (g)
M416	732	11.6	16	5	25	50

Ammo racks

Ammo racks of the Type 74 (F)

Full ammo	1st rack empty	2nd rack empty	3rd rack empty	Visual discrepancy
50	17 (+33)	10 (+40)	1 (+49)	Yes

Notes:

• Shells are modeled individually and disappear after having been shot or loaded.
• Racks 2 and 3 are first stage ammo racks. They total 16 shells and get filled first when loading up the tank.
  • These racks are also emptied early: the depletion order at full capacity is: 2 - 3 - 1.
  • Simply not firing when the gun is loaded will move ammo from racks 1-8 into rack 9. Firing will interrupt the restocking of the ready rack.
• The visual discrepancy concerns racks 1 and 3.
  • Rack 1 has 3 shells which, while modelled in the rack, are never present (crossed out shells).
  • Rack 1 is modelled as 30 shells but contains 34 shells.
  • Rack 3 has a shell which remains in the rack even after having been shot.

Optics and night vision

Type 74 (F) Optics
Type of optic	Magnification	Night Vision Devices
		Image Intensifier			Thermal Imager Resolution	Notes
		Resolution	Light Mult	Noise Level
Gunner's Sight	X8 - X16	800X600	8.0	High	Not Fitted	Image intensifier unlocked by "NVD" modification (tier 4)
Commander's View	X6	800X600	8.0	High	Not Fitted	Image intensifier unlocked by "NVD" modification (tier 4)
Driver's View	X1 / 3PV	800X600	5.0	High	Not Fitted	Image intensifier unlocked by "NVD" modification (tier 4)

Machine guns

12.7 mm M2HB machine gun

Ammunition600 rounds

Belt capacity200 rounds

Reloadbasic crew → aces

10.4 → 8.0 s

Fire rate575 shots/min

Vertical guidance-10° / 60°

Horizontal guidance-180° / 80°

7.62 mm Type 74 machine gun (coaxial)

Ammunition4 500 rounds

Belt capacity250 rounds

Reloadbasic crew → aces

10.4 → 8.0 s

Fire rate701 shots/min

12.7 mm M2HB
Mount	Capacity (Belt)	Fire rate	Vertical	Horizontal
Pintle	600 (200)	575	-10°/+60°	-180°/+80°

7.62 mm Type 74
Mount	Capacity (Belt)	Fire rate	Vertical	Horizontal
Coaxial	4,500 (250)	701	-	-

While it's not recommended, it's still possible to use 12.7 mm to fight light tanks like AUBL/74 HVG or Rooikat Mk.1D and most SPAA tanks at <100 m range.

Do not charge them with just the MG, especially at long range, as even poorly armoured rank V light tanks can survive frontal MG fire long enough to disarm and explode Type 74 - let them come to you, hit them with the main gun and ensure they never move again by firing at their sides or flat parts, while hiding yours.

Any melee oriented light tanks like BMP-2 or Warrior with add-on armour will have enough armour to absorb the MG fire and will greet Type 74 back with point blank ATGM attack, which machine guns will be unable to stop at such range.

Usage in battles

As the Type 74 (F) is very comparable to the Leopard 1 Series, especially the Leopard A1A1, it is recommended to play them in the same fashion as such. In a Hit & Run tactic.

The additional benefits of the Type 74 (F) over the Leopard A1A1 are:

• A top mounted .50 which can be used to deal with soft targets swiftly or damage gun barrels or track opponent tanks.
• Hydropneumatic suspension to:
  • Increase gun depression or elevation.
  • Improve traverse rate off- and on road.
  • Could vary the sloped angle of its armour towards the enemy.
• Stronger turret armour
• Night vision spotlight
• Better ammunition available:
  • Stock HEAT shell for the 74F while the Leopard starts with an APDS shell.
  • APFSDS shell researchable at tier I while it is a tier IV modification for the A1A1.

With all the additional benefits out of the way, it shouldn't be negated it's still a gen 2 MBT with barely any armour to rely upon other than the strong turret which still will be defeated by most rounds that the Type 74 (F) will face. It is advised to make use of the terrain to your advantage in combination with the hydropneumatic suspension. The stabilizer also allows for the Type 74 (F) to shoot on the move and due lower top speed compared to the Leopard, should be even easier to shoot on the move.

But even though armour isn't the strong suit of the Type 74 (F), it gets an amazing choice of rounds to make use of. Even the strongest tanks shouldn't disregard a stock Type 74 (F) as it gets HEATFS as stock shell and has access to the M735 APFSDS shell as soon as tier I (with a second more potent Type 93 APFSDS shell as tier IV modification), while such a shell usually is a tier IV modification for most 105 mm L7A3 carrying tanks, this improves the Type 74 (F)'s combat performance by a lot.

In a nutshell: Use the mobility with the cannon's perfection to flank and spank enemies (But if you have to resolve to a frontal attack, the APFSDS still allows for such a playstyle). Wait and hunt for the perfect positions and kill the enemy tanks one by one, while always maintaining a good situational awareness. Patience is the key to success.

Pros and cons

Pros:

• Same gun and general ammo choices as the NATO tanks
• Gets improved Type 93 APFSDS, which can deal frontally with anything the tank will see from any range
• A little bit more agile than the Leopard A1A1
• .50 cal machine gun proves useful against SPAAGs, as well as strafing aircraft
• Better frontal armour overall than the Leopards, ZSU-57-2 will have a much harder time defeating it from the front, can also bounce some medium tank APDS
• Hydropneumatic suspension system can give up to -12° of gun depression as well as more compatibility for terrain

Cons:

• Hydropneumatic suspension system takes time to deploy and undeploy
• Only -5° of gun depression without deploying the suspension
• 53 km/h top speed compared to Leopard A1A1's 65 km/h (however, both tanks rarely reach this speed)

History

Development

A year after the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force (JGSDF) issued out their first post-war main battle tank, the Type 61, development started on its successor, recognizing that the Type 61 was already becoming obsolete in terms of the new Soviet tanks being produced such as the T-62. Working alongside Mitsubishi once more, they looked for a new tank design incorporating many new features introduced in tank technology. This resulted in the tank having the hydropneumatic suspension system from the U.S.-German project MBT-70, a hull shape similar to Germany's Leopard I, and the powerful 105 mm L7 gun for its main armament. Other planned features for the tank was a rotatable commander's cupola and an autoloader system for the main gun.

The first prototype arrived for testing in 1968 as the STB-1. Modifications to the design started in 1969, which saw the autoloader removed for being too complex and expensive, as well as the removal of a proposed remote-controlled anti-aircraft machine gun for the same reason. The turret design was also elongated for various design purposes. The modified prototype was labelled STB-3 and was delivered in 1971. The final prototype, STB-6, was then delivered in 1973. The tank was then accepted for service in 1974 as the Type 74 tank. Production would start in September 1975 all the way to 1989, producing 893 tanks.

Service

Due to the defensive nature of the JSDF and the absence of any hostility rising out of the Cold War, the Type 74 spent its service life in the JGSDF with no battle service. During its service life however, it was upgraded with new hardware such as infra-red imagers for night fighting and a laser rangefinder for the commander. Despite all that, the Type 74 was generally outdated in terms of specifications even before entering service, as second-generation main battle tanks like the Chieftain and T-72 outclass it and development for third-generation main battle tanks like the Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams were already underway.

The tank was to be replaced by the newer Type 90 main battle tank, but the collapse of the Soviet Union and the official end of the Cold War caused the replacement program to be halted. Today, the Type 74 still sees limited service in Japan and it was reported that 700 units were still in use in 2006.

Type 74 (F)

The Type 74 (F) is the last non-major modification of the Type 74 family. The F variant comes mounting plates on the front of the hull to mount a Type 92 mineroller. Only 10 of the F-Type were made.

Compared to the Type 74, differences come from preceding variants such as:

• D-Type: Thermal Sleeve on the gun
• F-Type: Mounting Plates for Type 92 mineroller

Media

Skins

• Skins and camouflages for the Type 74 (F) from live.warthunder.com.

Videos

Type 74 tanks in a public demonstration - 2014 - JP‑SWAT

Real Sound Recording: Type 74 Edition - DMM GAMES Official Channel

JGSDF Type 74: 360° Video - DMM GAMES Official Channel

See also

Related Development

• Type 74 (Family)
  • STB-2 - (Prototype Stage)
  • Type 74 (C) - (Early Production version)
  • Type 74 (E) - (Variant with improved FCS & thermal sleeve)
  • Type 74 (G) - (Improved (改) variant with thermal and armour skirts)
  • Type 87 - (SPAAG built on a modified Type 74 Hull)

Other vehicles of similar configuration and role

• Leopard 1 (Family)
• OF-40 (Family)
• Vickers MBT Mk.1 - 3
• AMX-30 (Family)
• AMX-32 (105)
• M60 (Family)
• TAM (Family)
• M48A2 G A2
• T-54/55 (Family)
• T-62 (Family)

External links

Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:

• topic on the official game forum;
• other literature.