Difference between revisions of "Challenger 2E"
(completed the article) (Tag: Visual edit) |
Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (Edits / Do not modify templates) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Furthermore, the Challenger 2E lacks any additional armour packages, and does not have access to an [[Active protection systems|active protection system]], leaving it marginally more vulnerable than all other Challenger 2 variants. | Furthermore, the Challenger 2E lacks any additional armour packages, and does not have access to an [[Active protection systems|active protection system]], leaving it marginally more vulnerable than all other Challenger 2 variants. | ||
− | '''Armour type:''' | + | '''Armour type:''' |
− | + | ||
− | |||
* Rolled homogeneous armour | * Rolled homogeneous armour | ||
* Cast homogeneous armour | * Cast homogeneous armour | ||
Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! | + | ! Armour !! Front (Slope angle) !! Sides !! Rear !! Roof |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Hull | + | | Hull || 38-50 mm (60-83°) ''Upper glacis'' <br> 70 mm (28°) ''Lower glacis'' <br> |
− | |38-50 mm (60-83°) Upper | + | 60 mm (0-83°) ''Driver's port'' || 25 mm (71°) ''Top'' <br> 25 mm ''Middle'' <br> 38 mm (14°) ''Bottom'' || 50 mm (29-65°) || 10-20 mm (79-90°) |
− | |||
− | 70 mm (28°) Lower | ||
− | |||
− | 60 mm (0-83°) Driver's | ||
− | |25 mm (71°) Top | ||
− | |||
− | 25 mm | ||
− | |||
− | 38 mm (14°) Bottom | ||
− | |50 mm (29-65°) | ||
− | |10-20 mm (79-90°) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Turret | + | |Turret || 100 mm (50°) ''Turret cheeks'' <br> 30 mm (13-50°) ''Gun mantlet'' || 10-20 mm (8-10°) || 20 mm (18°) || 10-38 mm (0-15°) |
− | |100 mm (50°) Turret | ||
− | |||
− | 30 mm (13-50°) Gun | ||
− | |10-20 mm (8-10°) | ||
− | |20 mm (18°) | ||
− | |10-38 mm ( | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Cupola | + | |Cupola ||60 mm ||60 mm ||60 mm ||44 mm |
− | |60 mm | ||
− | |60 mm | ||
− | |60 mm | ||
− | |44 mm | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | '''Notes:''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* There are two 50 mm RHA plates on the Turret Cheeks leading to a total of 100 mm. | * There are two 50 mm RHA plates on the Turret Cheeks leading to a total of 100 mm. | ||
* Negligible structural steel surrounds the hull. | * Negligible structural steel surrounds the hull. | ||
Line 73: | Line 50: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | ! | + | ! Composite armour !! Front (Slope angle) !! Sides |
− | ! | ||
− | ! | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Hull | + | | Hull || 130 mm RHA + 200 mm NERA |
− | |130 mm RHA + 200 mm NERA | + | ! |
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Turret | + | | Turret || 160 mm RHA + 400 mm NERA + 110 mm CHA || 80 mm RHA + 230 mm NERA |
− | |160 mm RHA + 400 mm NERA + 110 mm CHA | ||
− | |80 mm RHA + 230 mm NERA | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
=== Mobility === | === Mobility === | ||
Line 96: | Line 63: | ||
The Challenger 2E has improved mobility when compared to all other Challenger 2 variants. This is due to its superior MTU engine, which replaces the comparatively underpowered Perkins CV12-6A used on all other Challenger 2 tanks. | The Challenger 2E has improved mobility when compared to all other Challenger 2 variants. This is due to its superior MTU engine, which replaces the comparatively underpowered Perkins CV12-6A used on all other Challenger 2 tanks. | ||
− | The MTU engine is about 20% more powerful than the Perkins CV12-6A. | + | The MTU engine is about 20% more powerful than the Perkins CV12-6A. The improved mobility of the Challenger 2E makes it comparable to most other top-tier MBTs, such as the [[Leopard 2A6]] or [[M1A2 SEP]]. |
− | + | {{tankMobility|abMinHp=2,325|rbMinHp=1,327}} | |
=== Modifications and economy === | === Modifications and economy === | ||
Line 112: | Line 79: | ||
The Challenger 2E mounts the same cannon as all other Challenger 2 tanks in War Thunder. It performs adequately, although some other nations have more capable cannons on their top-tier MBTs. Unlike most MBT cannons at this battle rating, it is rifled. This is to accommodate the HESH ammunition that is highly regarded in British tank doctrine. | The Challenger 2E mounts the same cannon as all other Challenger 2 tanks in War Thunder. It performs adequately, although some other nations have more capable cannons on their top-tier MBTs. Unlike most MBT cannons at this battle rating, it is rifled. This is to accommodate the HESH ammunition that is highly regarded in British tank doctrine. | ||
− | The L30A1 is incredibly accurate, although this isn't a unique characteristic for highly rated tanks. The range of ammunition it fires is likewise, good, but nothing special. This is especially damning considering the comparatively limited ammunition selection versus other | + | The L30A1 is incredibly accurate, although this isn't a unique characteristic for highly rated tanks. The range of ammunition it fires is likewise, good, but nothing special. This is especially damning considering the comparatively limited ammunition selection versus other nations' tanks; the Challenger 2E doesn't have access to HEATFS, HE-VT, or ATGM ammunition. |
Where it really shines, however, is it's immense rate of fire. The Challenger 2E - like its predecessors - share the joint title of the fastest 120 mm non-autoloading cannon in War Thunder. The Challenger 2E has one of the fastest firing cannons of any top-tier tank, and can deal out damage at a near absurd rate. With an untrained crew, it has a reload time of 6.5 seconds, however this drops down to an astonishing 5 seconds with an aced crew, lending it a fire rate of 12 rounds per minute. | Where it really shines, however, is it's immense rate of fire. The Challenger 2E - like its predecessors - share the joint title of the fastest 120 mm non-autoloading cannon in War Thunder. The Challenger 2E has one of the fastest firing cannons of any top-tier tank, and can deal out damage at a near absurd rate. With an untrained crew, it has a reload time of 6.5 seconds, however this drops down to an astonishing 5 seconds with an aced crew, lending it a fire rate of 12 rounds per minute. | ||
+ | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="100%" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" width="100%" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! colspan="5" | [[L30A1 (120 mm)| | + | ! colspan="5" | [[L30A1 (120 mm)|120 mm L30A1]] || colspan="5" | Turret rotation speed (°/s) || colspan="4" | Reloading rate (seconds) |
|- | |- | ||
− | ! | + | ! Mode !! Capacity !! Vertical !! Horizontal !! Stabilizer |
− | ! | + | ! Stock !! Upgraded !! Full !! Expert !! Aced |
− | ! | + | ! Stock !! Full !! Expert !! Aced |
− | |- | + | |- |
− | ! | + | ! ''Arcade'' |
| rowspan="2" | 50 || rowspan="2" | -10°/+20° || rowspan="2" | ±180° || rowspan="2" | Two-plane ||29.5||40.8||49.6||54.8||58.4|| rowspan="2" |6.50|| rowspan="2" |5.75|| rowspan="2" |5.30|| rowspan="2" |5.00 | | rowspan="2" | 50 || rowspan="2" | -10°/+20° || rowspan="2" | ±180° || rowspan="2" | Two-plane ||29.5||40.8||49.6||54.8||58.4|| rowspan="2" |6.50|| rowspan="2" |5.75|| rowspan="2" |5.30|| rowspan="2" |5.00 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! | + | ! ''Realistic'' |
|18.4||21.7||26.4||29.1||31.0 | |18.4||21.7||26.4||29.1||31.0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 139: | Line 107: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! | + | ! Full<br>ammo |
− | ! | + | ! Ammo<br>type |
− | + | ! 1st<br>rack empty | |
− | ! | + | ! 2nd<br>rack empty |
− | ! | + | ! 3rd<br>rack empty |
− | ! | + | ! 4th<br>rack empty |
− | ! | + | ! 5th<br>rack empty |
− | ! | + | ! 6th<br>rack empty |
− | ! | + | ! 7th<br>rack empty |
− | ! | + | ! 8th<br>rack empty |
− | + | ! Visual<br>discrepancy | |
− | ! | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ! | ||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''50''' | + | | '''50''' || Projectiles <br> Propellants || 48 ''(+2)''<br>45 ''(+5)'' || 45 ''(+5)''<br>39 ''(+11)'' || 43 ''(+7)''<br>31 ''(+19)'' || 41 ''(+9)''<br>22 ''(+28)'' || 34 ''(+16)''<br>14 ''(+36)'' || 29 ''(+21)''<br>5 ''(+45)'' || 5 ''(+45)''<br>1 ''(+49)'' || 4 ''(+46)''<br> || 1 ''(+49)''<br> || No |
− | | | ||
− | |||
− | |48 ''(+2)'' | ||
− | 45 ''(+5)'' | ||
− | |45 ''(+5)'' | ||
− | 39 ''(+11)'' | ||
− | |43 ''(+7)'' | ||
− | 31 ''(+19)'' | ||
− | |41 ''(+9)'' | ||
− | 22 ''(+28)'' | ||
− | |34 ''(+16)'' | ||
− | 14 ''(+36)'' | ||
− | |29 ''(+21)'' | ||
− | 5 ''(+45)'' | ||
− | |5 ''(+45)'' | ||
− | 1 ''(+49)'' | ||
− | |4 ''(+46)'' | ||
− | | ||
− | |1 ''(+49)'' | ||
− | | ||
− | |No | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 210: | Line 151: | ||
== Usage in battles == | == Usage in battles == | ||
− | <!-- ''Describe the tactics of playing in the vehicle, the features of using vehicles in the team and advice on tactics. Refrain from creating a "guide" - do not impose a single point of view but instead give the reader food for thought. Describe the most dangerous enemies and give recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of the game in different modes (AB, RB, SB).'' -->The Challenger 2E should be used in a near-identical fashion to the other Challenger 2 tanks. | + | <!-- ''Describe the tactics of playing in the vehicle, the features of using vehicles in the team and advice on tactics. Refrain from creating a "guide" - do not impose a single point of view but instead give the reader food for thought. Describe the most dangerous enemies and give recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of the game in different modes (AB, RB, SB).'' --> |
+ | The Challenger 2E should be used in a near-identical fashion to the other Challenger 2 tanks. | ||
That is to say: | That is to say: | ||
Line 230: | Line 172: | ||
* Very survivable armour profile | * Very survivable armour profile | ||
* Advanced fire-control system | * Advanced fire-control system | ||
− | ** Modern | + | ** Modern night vision devices |
* Adequate firepower | * Adequate firepower | ||
** Overwhelming rate of fire | ** Overwhelming rate of fire | ||
* Competitive mobility | * Competitive mobility | ||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Cons:''' | '''Cons:''' | ||
Line 241: | Line 181: | ||
* Large and vulnerable weak spots | * Large and vulnerable weak spots | ||
* Minimal anti-air capabilities | * Minimal anti-air capabilities | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
<!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).'' --> | <!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the vehicle in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).'' --> | ||
− | The Challenger 2E was a private venture by | + | The Challenger 2E was a private venture by Vickers plc, aimed at the export market. The 2E was designed after the failure of the Challenger 2 to gain international sales, with only 38 being sold. |
The Challenger 2E was marketed as being a high-end and capable tank that would outperform all competition, unlike the budget series of the [[Vickers MBT (Family)|Vickers family]]. The primary target for the 2E was the gulf nations, as well as several Mediterranean nations. Adjustments were made to the basic Challenger 2 to accommodate these potential markets, such as native integration of air filtration and air conditioning. | The Challenger 2E was marketed as being a high-end and capable tank that would outperform all competition, unlike the budget series of the [[Vickers MBT (Family)|Vickers family]]. The primary target for the 2E was the gulf nations, as well as several Mediterranean nations. Adjustments were made to the basic Challenger 2 to accommodate these potential markets, such as native integration of air filtration and air conditioning. | ||
Line 264: | Line 201: | ||
== Media == | == Media == | ||
− | + | ''Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.'' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
<!-- ''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:'' | <!-- ''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:'' | ||
* ''reference to the series of the vehicles;'' | * ''reference to the series of the vehicles;'' | ||
− | * ''links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.'' --> | + | * ''links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.'' --> |
+ | ;Related development | ||
* [[Challenger 2 (Family)]] | * [[Challenger 2 (Family)]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Analogues in other nations''' | '''Analogues in other nations''' | ||
− | |||
* [[M1 Abrams (Family)]] | * [[M1 Abrams (Family)]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* [[Leopard 2 (Family)]] | * [[Leopard 2 (Family)]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* [[Leclerc (Family)]] | * [[Leclerc (Family)]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Line 297: | Line 220: | ||
* ''topic on the official game forum;'' | * ''topic on the official game forum;'' | ||
* ''other literature.'' --> | * ''other literature.'' --> | ||
+ | |||
* [[wikipedia:Challenger_2|[Wikipedia] Challenger 2]] | * [[wikipedia:Challenger_2|[Wikipedia] Challenger 2]] | ||
* [[wt:en/news/8108-development-challenger-2e-hurry-up-sir-en|[Development] Challenger 2E - Hurry up, Sir!]] | * [[wt:en/news/8108-development-challenger-2e-hurry-up-sir-en|[Development] Challenger 2E - Hurry up, Sir!]] | ||
{{Britain medium tanks}} | {{Britain medium tanks}} |
Revision as of 17:08, 9 March 2023
Contents
Description
The Challenger 2E is a rank VIII British medium tank with a battle rating of 12.0 (AB/RB/SB). It was introduced in Update "Sky Guardians".
The Challenger 2E is a return to tradition in the Challenger 2 Family, a far more conventional vehicle when compared to the Challenger 2 TES or the Black Night. Unlike the other versions of the Challenger 2, it was aimed at the export market, although it failed to receive any orders.
When compared to the other versions of the Challenger 2, it has a substantially more powerful engine, bringing it in-line with many of its international competitors.
General info
Survivability and armour
Like all Challenger 2 tanks, the armour is exceptional. It is capable of defeating even the most powerful of APFSDS rounds when hull-down, and it can even withstand HEAT rounds to the sides. Nonetheless, it has a few weak spots, particularly the cannon breech and the lower glacis.
The armour profile of the Challenger 2E is practically identical to all other Challenger 2 tanks, so there should be no difficulty in adapting from its predecessors.
Furthermore, the Challenger 2E lacks any additional armour packages, and does not have access to an active protection system, leaving it marginally more vulnerable than all other Challenger 2 variants.
Armour type:
- Rolled homogeneous armour
- Cast homogeneous armour
- Composite armour
- Structural steel
- Gun steel
- Rubber-fabric screens
Armour | Front (Slope angle) | Sides | Rear | Roof |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hull | 38-50 mm (60-83°) Upper glacis 70 mm (28°) Lower glacis 60 mm (0-83°) Driver's port || 25 mm (71°) Top | |||
Turret | 100 mm (50°) Turret cheeks 30 mm (13-50°) Gun mantlet |
10-20 mm (8-10°) | 20 mm (18°) | 10-38 mm (0-15°) |
Cupola | 60 mm | 60 mm | 60 mm | 44 mm |
Notes:
- There are two 50 mm RHA plates on the Turret Cheeks leading to a total of 100 mm.
- Negligible structural steel surrounds the hull.
- There is a 38 mm thick set of cast steel armour in the turrets crew compartment.
Composite armour | Front (Slope angle) | Sides |
---|---|---|
Hull | 130 mm RHA + 200 mm NERA | |
Turret | 160 mm RHA + 400 mm NERA + 110 mm CHA | 80 mm RHA + 230 mm NERA |
Mobility
The Challenger 2E has improved mobility when compared to all other Challenger 2 variants. This is due to its superior MTU engine, which replaces the comparatively underpowered Perkins CV12-6A used on all other Challenger 2 tanks.
The MTU engine is about 20% more powerful than the Perkins CV12-6A. The improved mobility of the Challenger 2E makes it comparable to most other top-tier MBTs, such as the Leopard 2A6 or M1A2 SEP.
Game Mode | Max Speed (km/h) | Weight (tons) | Engine power (horsepower) | Power-to-weight ratio (hp/ton) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forward | Reverse | Stock | Upgraded | Stock | Upgraded | ||
Arcade | 80 | 39 | 62.5 | 2,325 | 2,862 | 37.2 | 45.79 |
Realistic | 72 | 35 | 1,327 | 1,500 | 21.23 | 24 |
Modifications and economy
Armaments
Main armament
The Challenger 2E mounts the same cannon as all other Challenger 2 tanks in War Thunder. It performs adequately, although some other nations have more capable cannons on their top-tier MBTs. Unlike most MBT cannons at this battle rating, it is rifled. This is to accommodate the HESH ammunition that is highly regarded in British tank doctrine.
The L30A1 is incredibly accurate, although this isn't a unique characteristic for highly rated tanks. The range of ammunition it fires is likewise, good, but nothing special. This is especially damning considering the comparatively limited ammunition selection versus other nations' tanks; the Challenger 2E doesn't have access to HEATFS, HE-VT, or ATGM ammunition.
Where it really shines, however, is it's immense rate of fire. The Challenger 2E - like its predecessors - share the joint title of the fastest 120 mm non-autoloading cannon in War Thunder. The Challenger 2E has one of the fastest firing cannons of any top-tier tank, and can deal out damage at a near absurd rate. With an untrained crew, it has a reload time of 6.5 seconds, however this drops down to an astonishing 5 seconds with an aced crew, lending it a fire rate of 12 rounds per minute.
120 mm L30A1 | Turret rotation speed (°/s) | Reloading rate (seconds) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mode | Capacity | Vertical | Horizontal | Stabilizer | Stock | Upgraded | Full | Expert | Aced | Stock | Full | Expert | Aced |
Arcade | 50 | -10°/+20° | ±180° | Two-plane | 29.5 | 40.8 | 49.6 | 54.8 | 58.4 | 6.50 | 5.75 | 5.30 | 5.00 |
Realistic | 18.4 | 21.7 | 26.4 | 29.1 | 31.0 |
Ammunition
Penetration statistics | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm) | |||||
10 m | 100 m | 500 m | 1,000 m | 1,500 m | 2,000 m | ||
Shot L23A1 | APFSDS | 396 | 394 | 387 | 376 | 367 | 357 |
Shell L31A7 | HESH | 152 | 152 | 152 | 152 | 152 | 152 |
L26 | APFSDS | 493 | 491 | 487 | 481 | 474 | 468 |
L27A1 | APFSDS | 564 | 562 | 557 | 551 | 545 | 538 |
Shell details | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Fuse delay (m) |
Fuse sensitivity (mm) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (kg) |
Ricochet | |||||
0% | 50% | 100% | ||||||||||
Shot L23A1 | APFSDS | 1,535 | 3.89 | - | - | - | 78° | 80° | 81° | |||
Shell L31A7 | HESH | 670 | 17.34 | 0.1 | 4 | 6.53 | 73° | 77° | 80° | |||
L26 | APFSDS | 1,650 | 4.3 | - | - | - | 78° | 80° | 81° | |||
L27A1 | APFSDS | 1,650 | 4.3 | - | - | - | 78° | 80° | 81° |
Smoke shell characteristics | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Screen radius (m) |
Screen deploy time (s) |
Screen hold time (s) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (g) |
L34 | 670 | 17.1 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 50 |
Ammo racks
Full ammo |
Ammo type |
1st rack empty |
2nd rack empty |
3rd rack empty |
4th rack empty |
5th rack empty |
6th rack empty |
7th rack empty |
8th rack empty |
Visual discrepancy | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | Projectiles Propellants |
48 (+2) 45 (+5) |
45 (+5) 39 (+11) |
43 (+7) 31 (+19) |
41 (+9) 22 (+28) |
34 (+16) 14 (+36) |
29 (+21) 5 (+45) |
5 (+45) 1 (+49) |
4 (+46) |
1 (+49) |
No |
Machine guns
The Challenger 2E has access to one 7.62 mm coaxial machine gun, and one 12.7 mm machine gun mounted on the roof. All other Challenger 2 tanks lack a high calibre machine gun, giving this tank increased lethality against enemy aircraft and light vehicles.
12.7 mm M2HB | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mount | Capacity (Belt) | Fire rate | Vertical | Horizontal |
Pintle | 1,000 (200) | 650 | -10°/+30° | ±60° |
7.62 mm L94A1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mount | Capacity (Belt) | Fire rate | Vertical | Horizontal |
Coaxial | 4,000 (2,000) | 600 | -10°/+20° | ±0° |
Usage in battles
The Challenger 2E should be used in a near-identical fashion to the other Challenger 2 tanks.
That is to say:
- Remain at long-range
- Lock down enemy advances
- Stay hull-down
- Do not rush in, play patiently
- If advancing, stick with the team
Although, the Challenger 2E has substantially improved mobility, so it can be used more aggressively. Players are at liberty to decide how they control this tank far more than its other iterations. However, one must be aware of their positioning relative to the team. Stray too far ahead with that great engine power, and you risk over-extending and becoming isolated, only to be swarmed by enemy tanks.
Nonetheless, this is still ill-advised. The Challenger 2E has an advantage over most enemies at long-range. While the tank can be used aggressively, this throws away the advantage. While it doesn't put you at substantially increased risk, you are not as capable as you could be.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Very survivable armour profile
- Advanced fire-control system
- Modern night vision devices
- Adequate firepower
- Overwhelming rate of fire
- Competitive mobility
Cons:
- Large and vulnerable weak spots
- Minimal anti-air capabilities
History
The Challenger 2E was a private venture by Vickers plc, aimed at the export market. The 2E was designed after the failure of the Challenger 2 to gain international sales, with only 38 being sold.
The Challenger 2E was marketed as being a high-end and capable tank that would outperform all competition, unlike the budget series of the Vickers family. The primary target for the 2E was the gulf nations, as well as several Mediterranean nations. Adjustments were made to the basic Challenger 2 to accommodate these potential markets, such as native integration of air filtration and air conditioning.
Additionally, space was freed up in the crew compartment to accommodate an internal toilet, one of the only tanks in history to do so.
Unfortunately for Vickers, the Challenger 2E was a failure, and did not attract any orders. This was one of many contributing factors that led Vickers plc to go under, eventually being folded into BAE Systems.
One reason for the failure of the Challenger 2E was the reluctance of the British government to sell the Challenger 2E to foreign countries, due to the immensely classified nature of its Chobham armour profile. Were relations to sour between Britain and the prospective buyer, or were the Challenger 2E to be captured by an enemy state, the exact armour profile of the Challenger 2 could be calculated - and perhaps even reverse engineered.
This was especially concerning given the sheer number of tanks using Chobham armour - not only d
Additionally, the Challenger 2E performed rather poorly in the 1998 Greek tank trials, irreparably damaging its reputation.
By 2005, the Challenger 2E project was entirely abandoned by BAE systems.
Media
Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.
See also
- Related development
Analogues in other nations
External links
Britain medium tanks | |
---|---|
Valentine | Valentine I · Valentine IX · Valentine XI |
Cromwell | Cromwell I · Cromwell V · Cromwell V (RP-3) |
Cromwell derivatives | Challenger · Avenger · Comet I · Comet I "Iron Duke IV" · Charioteer Mk VII |
Centurion | Centurion Mk 1 · Centurion Mk.2 · Centurion Mk 3 · Centurion Mk.5 AVRE · Centurion Mk 10 · Centurion Action X · FV4202 |
Vickers MBT | Vickers Mk.1 · Vickers Mk.3 · Vickers Mk.7 |
Chieftain | Chieftain Mk 3 · Chieftain Mk 5 · Chieftain Mk 10 |
Challenger 1 | Challenger Mk.2 · Challenger Mk.3 · Challenger DS |
Challenger 2 | Challenger 2 · Challenger 2 (2F) · Challenger 2 TES · Challenger 2 OES · Challenger 2E · Challenger 2 Black Night |
Challenger 3 | Challenger 3 TD |
Australia | A.C.I · A.C.IV · Centurion Mk.5/1 |
South Africa | Olifant Mk.1A · Olifant Mk.2 · TTD |
India | Vijayanta · Bhishma TWMP |
Israel | ▄Sho't Kal Dalet |
Jordan | Khalid |
Sweden | ▄Strv 81 (RB 52) |
USA | Grant I · Sherman II · Sherman Firefly · Sherman IC "Trzyniec" |
- Ground vehicles
- Britain ground vehicles
- Eighth rank ground vehicles
- Medium tanks
- Ground vehicles with composite armour
- Ground vehicles with smoke grenades
- Ground vehicles with engine smoke generating system
- Ground vehicles with night vision device
- Ground vehicles with thermal sight
- Ground vehicles with gun stabilizer