Difference between revisions of "B6N (Family)"
m (Undo revision to last approved) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{DISPLAYTITLE:B6N (Family)}} | ||
[[File:B6N family.gif|right|thumb|500px|Visual comparison of the Nakajima B6N bombers]] | [[File:B6N family.gif|right|thumb|500px|Visual comparison of the Nakajima B6N bombers]] | ||
{{Break}} | {{Break}} | ||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
| − | The B6N, | + | The '''Nakajima B6N''', designated as '''Tenzan ({{Annotation|天山|Heavenly Mountain}})''', was a carrier-based torpedo bomber developed for the Imperial Japanese Navy in World War II. It was designed to replace the '''B5N''', but faced many technical problems and delays. It had a crew of three, a maximum speed of 460 km/h, and a range of 1,900 km. It could carry a torpedo or a rack of bombs under its fuselage. It entered service in 1943 but saw limited action due to the loss of Japanese carriers and air superiority. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Nicknames being: | Nicknames being: | ||
| Line 20: | Line 13: | ||
==Vehicles== | ==Vehicles== | ||
===Rank I=== | ===Rank I=== | ||
| − | |||
* [[B6N1 Model 11]] - <small>Tenzan Model 11</small> | * [[B6N1 Model 11]] - <small>Tenzan Model 11</small> | ||
===Rank II=== | ===Rank II=== | ||
| − | |||
* [[B6N2 Model 12]] - <small>Tenzan Model 12</small> | * [[B6N2 Model 12]] - <small>Tenzan Model 12</small> | ||
* [[B6N2a Model 12Ko]] - <small>Tenzan Model 12 Ko</small> | * [[B6N2a Model 12Ko]] - <small>Tenzan Model 12 Ko</small> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 21: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
===Development=== | ===Development=== | ||
| − | In 1939, the Navy requested a new torpedo bomber to replace the quickly ageing B5N. The design team, led by Matsumura Kenichi, met the 1939 Navy specification to replace the B5N almost entirely by using a much more powerful engine and tweaked wing design. Stowage restrictions on carriers ruled out significant improvements in the airframe, other than eliminating the forward sweep of the vertical tail surface on the B6N. Like the B5N, the B6N had no bomb bay, carrying its torpedo under the fuselage offset to the side (to clear the oil cooler). | + | In 1939, the Navy requested a new torpedo bomber to replace the quickly ageing B5N. The design team, led by Matsumura Kenichi, met the 1939 Navy specification to replace the B5N almost entirely by using a much more powerful engine and tweaked wing design. Stowage restrictions on carriers ruled out significant improvements in the airframe, other than eliminating the forward sweep of the vertical tail surface on the B6N. Like the B5N, the B6N had no bomb bay, carrying its torpedo under the fuselage offset to the side (to clear the oil cooler). |
The prototypes were ready in the spring of 1941, but it was found that the vertical tail surface had to be tilted slightly to compensate for propeller torque. The modified aircraft handled well, but the Nakajima NK7A ''Mamoru'' engine had serious teething problems as Nakajima was stubborn on using an engine of its design instead of complying with the navy's suggestion of using the Mitsubishi ''Kasei'' engine, and carrier acceptance trials at the end of 1942 showed the landing hook was too weak. Carrier trials were completed in early 1943, and the aircraft was finally accepted for production. Even then, there were reports of rudders tearing loose during takeoff due to turbulence from the engine, requiring further redesign of the rudders. But because of the complications of the engine hurt the economic side of the production and thus outweighed the benefits of its reliability and long range. The full-scale production of the B6N could only be introduced by 1943. In the end, Nakajima grudgingly agreed to replace its engine with that of Mitsubishi to allow full production. | The prototypes were ready in the spring of 1941, but it was found that the vertical tail surface had to be tilted slightly to compensate for propeller torque. The modified aircraft handled well, but the Nakajima NK7A ''Mamoru'' engine had serious teething problems as Nakajima was stubborn on using an engine of its design instead of complying with the navy's suggestion of using the Mitsubishi ''Kasei'' engine, and carrier acceptance trials at the end of 1942 showed the landing hook was too weak. Carrier trials were completed in early 1943, and the aircraft was finally accepted for production. Even then, there were reports of rudders tearing loose during takeoff due to turbulence from the engine, requiring further redesign of the rudders. But because of the complications of the engine hurt the economic side of the production and thus outweighed the benefits of its reliability and long range. The full-scale production of the B6N could only be introduced by 1943. In the end, Nakajima grudgingly agreed to replace its engine with that of Mitsubishi to allow full production. | ||
| Line 42: | Line 33: | ||
With the fewer remaining Japanese carriers, the B6N was used often from land-based units, with prime examples being its debut year seeing first combat at Bougainville in November 1943, operating from land bases around Rabaul. It was so common for B6Ns to be used as a regular bomber instead of a carrier-based bomber that Nakajima had to revise a 3rd model of the B6N, being the [[#B6N3 mod.13|B6N3]] to have a modified undercarriage to give it a better rough field capability. However, this variant didn't get produced as the war ended. | With the fewer remaining Japanese carriers, the B6N was used often from land-based units, with prime examples being its debut year seeing first combat at Bougainville in November 1943, operating from land bases around Rabaul. It was so common for B6Ns to be used as a regular bomber instead of a carrier-based bomber that Nakajima had to revise a 3rd model of the B6N, being the [[#B6N3 mod.13|B6N3]] to have a modified undercarriage to give it a better rough field capability. However, this variant didn't get produced as the war ended. | ||
| − | By 1944, B6N's operating from Japanese carriers engaged in the Battle of the Philippine Sea, but with the lack of experienced Japanese pilots, allied air power and air defence, little damage was sustained to enemy ships and results were averaged for the B6N. | + | By 1944, B6N's operating from Japanese carriers engaged in the Battle of the Philippine Sea, but with the lack of experienced Japanese pilots, allied air power and air defence, little damage was sustained to enemy ships and results were averaged for the B6N. |
By late 1944/1945, like most Japanese aircraft, the B6N was launched from land-based airfields to be used as Kamikaze as a last resort of the plane, as chances of coming back from a conventional attack were already as slim. | By late 1944/1945, like most Japanese aircraft, the B6N was launched from land-based airfields to be used as Kamikaze as a last resort of the plane, as chances of coming back from a conventional attack were already as slim. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 43: | ||
Main production variant of the B6N featuring a Mitsubishi MK4T ''Kasei'' 25 engine. 1,131 Built as B6N2/B6N2a | Main production variant of the B6N featuring a Mitsubishi MK4T ''Kasei'' 25 engine. 1,131 Built as B6N2/B6N2a | ||
====[[B6N2a Model 12Ko|B6N2a mod. 12A]]==== | ====[[B6N2a Model 12Ko|B6N2a mod. 12A]]==== | ||
| − | Revised tail armament, [[Type 92 (7.7 mm)|7.7 mm Navy Type 92]] was replaced with a [[Type 2 (13 mm)|13 mm Navy Type 2]]. | + | Revised tail armament, [[Type 92 (7.7 mm)|7.7 mm Navy Type 92]] was replaced with a [[Type 2 (13 mm)|13 mm Navy Type 2]]. |
===B6N3 mod.13=== | ===B6N3 mod.13=== | ||
Performance improved by using the Mitsubishi MK4T-B Kasei 25b. Modified landing gear for land-based take-off and landing. 2 prototypes built. | Performance improved by using the Mitsubishi MK4T-B Kasei 25b. Modified landing gear for land-based take-off and landing. 2 prototypes built. | ||
| Line 58: | Line 49: | ||
== Media == | == Media == | ||
<!-- ''Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.'' --> | <!-- ''Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.'' --> | ||
| − | |||
;Videos | ;Videos | ||
{{Youtube-gallery|qsHfTef-Xvg|'''The Shooting Range #293''' - ''Pages of History'' section at 04:22 discusses the B5N and B6N torpedo bombers.}} | {{Youtube-gallery|qsHfTef-Xvg|'''The Shooting Range #293''' - ''Pages of History'' section at 04:22 discusses the B5N and B6N torpedo bombers.}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:12, 22 March 2024
Contents
Description
The Nakajima B6N, designated as Tenzan (天山), was a carrier-based torpedo bomber developed for the Imperial Japanese Navy in World War II. It was designed to replace the B5N, but faced many technical problems and delays. It had a crew of three, a maximum speed of 460 km/h, and a range of 1,900 km. It could carry a torpedo or a rack of bombs under its fuselage. It entered service in 1943 but saw limited action due to the loss of Japanese carriers and air superiority.
Nicknames being:
- ▅ - Tenzan (天山, Heavenly Mountain)
- ▃ - Jill
Vehicles
Rank I
- B6N1 Model 11 - Tenzan Model 11
Rank II
- B6N2 Model 12 - Tenzan Model 12
- B6N2a Model 12Ko - Tenzan Model 12 Ko
History
Development
In 1939, the Navy requested a new torpedo bomber to replace the quickly ageing B5N. The design team, led by Matsumura Kenichi, met the 1939 Navy specification to replace the B5N almost entirely by using a much more powerful engine and tweaked wing design. Stowage restrictions on carriers ruled out significant improvements in the airframe, other than eliminating the forward sweep of the vertical tail surface on the B6N. Like the B5N, the B6N had no bomb bay, carrying its torpedo under the fuselage offset to the side (to clear the oil cooler).
The prototypes were ready in the spring of 1941, but it was found that the vertical tail surface had to be tilted slightly to compensate for propeller torque. The modified aircraft handled well, but the Nakajima NK7A Mamoru engine had serious teething problems as Nakajima was stubborn on using an engine of its design instead of complying with the navy's suggestion of using the Mitsubishi Kasei engine, and carrier acceptance trials at the end of 1942 showed the landing hook was too weak. Carrier trials were completed in early 1943, and the aircraft was finally accepted for production. Even then, there were reports of rudders tearing loose during takeoff due to turbulence from the engine, requiring further redesign of the rudders. But because of the complications of the engine hurt the economic side of the production and thus outweighed the benefits of its reliability and long range. The full-scale production of the B6N could only be introduced by 1943. In the end, Nakajima grudgingly agreed to replace its engine with that of Mitsubishi to allow full production.
Design
The B6N had a maximum range of around 1,900 km with a service ceiling of about 9,000 m. The plane itself had a total length of around 10.8 m and a total weight of 3,010 kg. The reliability of the B6N in the field was excellent, thanks to the engine power being much better than the B5N.
Combat History
After the B6N1 was introduced in mid-1943, examples were immediately issued to the last remaining aircraft carrier groups, such as on the Japanese carrier Zuikaku. By late 1943, the B6N2 was in full service within naval and land-based units around the South Pacific, even though it still didn't immediately replace all older B5Ns in service.
With the fewer remaining Japanese carriers, the B6N was used often from land-based units, with prime examples being its debut year seeing first combat at Bougainville in November 1943, operating from land bases around Rabaul. It was so common for B6Ns to be used as a regular bomber instead of a carrier-based bomber that Nakajima had to revise a 3rd model of the B6N, being the B6N3 to have a modified undercarriage to give it a better rough field capability. However, this variant didn't get produced as the war ended.
By 1944, B6N's operating from Japanese carriers engaged in the Battle of the Philippine Sea, but with the lack of experienced Japanese pilots, allied air power and air defence, little damage was sustained to enemy ships and results were averaged for the B6N.
By late 1944/1945, like most Japanese aircraft, the B6N was launched from land-based airfields to be used as Kamikaze as a last resort of the plane, as chances of coming back from a conventional attack were already as slim.
Variants
B6N1 mod. 11
Prototype stage of 2 planes fitted out with the Nakajima NK7A Mamori 11 engine. Production of the B6N1 went up to 133.
B6N2 mod. 12
Main production variant of the B6N featuring a Mitsubishi MK4T Kasei 25 engine. 1,131 Built as B6N2/B6N2a
B6N2a mod. 12A
Revised tail armament, 7.7 mm Navy Type 92 was replaced with a 13 mm Navy Type 2.
B6N3 mod.13
Performance improved by using the Mitsubishi MK4T-B Kasei 25b. Modified landing gear for land-based take-off and landing. 2 prototypes built.
Media
- Videos
| Nakajima Aircraft Company (中島飛行機株式会社 ) | |
|---|---|
| Fighters | Ki-27 otsu · Ki-27 otsu Tachiarai |
| Ki-43-I · Ki-43-II · Ki-43-III otsu | |
| Ki-44-I · Ki-44-I 34 · Ki-44-II otsu · Ki-44-II hei | |
| Ki-84 ko · Ki-84 otsu · Ki-84 hei | |
| Ki-87 | |
| Hydroplanes | A6M2-N* |
| Interceptors | J1N1 · J5N1 |
| Bombers | B5N2 |
| B6N1 Model 11 · B6N2 Model 12 · B6N2a Model 12Ko | |
| G5N1 · G8N1 | |
| Ki-49-I · Ki-49-IIa · Ki-49-IIb · Ki-49-IIb/L | |
| Recon | E8N2 |
| Jet Fighters | Kikka |
| Captured | ␗Ki-27 otsu · ▃Ki-43-II · ␗Ki-43-III ko · ␗Ki-44-II hei · ␗Ki-84 ko |
| *Refit of the Mitsubishi A6M2 mod. 11 | |
| See also | Fuji Heavy Industries (1957-2017) |
| Japan bombers | |
|---|---|
| Navy | |
| Carrier-based attack bomber | |
| B5N | B5N2 |
| B6N | B6N1 · B6N2 · B6N2a |
| B7A | B7A2 · B7A2 (Homare 23) |
| Carrier-based dive bomber | |
| D3A | D3A1 |
| D4Y | D4Y1 · D4Y2 · D4Y3 Ko |
| Shipboard Observation seaplane | |
| F1M | F1M2 |
| Land-based Attack bomber | |
| G4M | G4M1 |
| G5N | G5N1 |
| G8N | G8N1 |
| Flying boat | |
| H6K | H6K4 |
| H8K | H8K2 · H8K3 |
| Land-based Bomber | |
| P1Y | P1Y1 |
| Army | |
| Light | Ki-32 |
| Ki-48-II otsu | |
| Heavy | Ki-21-Ia · Ki-21-I hei |
| Ki-49-I · Ki-49-IIa · Ki-49-IIb · Ki-49-IIb/L | |
| Ki-67-I Ko · Ki-67-I otsu | |
| Other countries | ▅B-17E |
