Difference between revisions of "M1 (76 mm)"
Inceptor57 (talk | contribs) (→History) |
Inceptor57 (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
The Battle of the Bulge turned a few heads for the 76 mm. Before that, German armour were only experienced in sporadic situations, with only minor counter-offensives at areas like the Battle of Arracourt. There were divided feelings about the 76 mm due to its decreased HE performance compared to the 75 mm, and that the 75 mm has specialized ammo like the white phosphorus round that the 76 did not have. Thus, proposals to completely replace the 75 with the 76 were met with objections. But after the Battle of the Bulge, the criticism changed to the inadequacy of the 75 mm against the German tanks like the [[Panther G|Panther]] and the heavier [[Tiger II (H)|Tiger II]]. 12th US Army Group on 29 January 1945 even requested that all US tanks that arrive in Europe be the 76 mm version, refusing anymore 75 mm Shermans.<ref name="Zaloga76Sherman"/> | The Battle of the Bulge turned a few heads for the 76 mm. Before that, German armour were only experienced in sporadic situations, with only minor counter-offensives at areas like the Battle of Arracourt. There were divided feelings about the 76 mm due to its decreased HE performance compared to the 75 mm, and that the 75 mm has specialized ammo like the white phosphorus round that the 76 did not have. Thus, proposals to completely replace the 75 with the 76 were met with objections. But after the Battle of the Bulge, the criticism changed to the inadequacy of the 75 mm against the German tanks like the [[Panther G|Panther]] and the heavier [[Tiger II (H)|Tiger II]]. 12th US Army Group on 29 January 1945 even requested that all US tanks that arrive in Europe be the 76 mm version, refusing anymore 75 mm Shermans.<ref name="Zaloga76Sherman"/> | ||
− | The 76 mm faced more than a fair share of criticism throughout its life. Promised to give a bigger punch than the 75 mm, it fell short with changing times against improving German armor as it was design created with a mindset of German armour in 1942. Still, as a tank gun, the 76 mm did its job as best it could against the opposition, and was still overall a better gun in several respects that after the war, the 76 mm were retained on the [[M4A3 (76) W|M4A3E8 Sherman]]. In the 1950s in the Korean War, the 76 mm still proved adequate against the Soviet [[T-34-85]] and no complaints were made on the Sherman's role as an infantry support during the latter stages of the war.<ref name="ZalogaM26vsT-34">Zaloga 2010</ref> Though, as the armament of the evolving U.S. tank force, the 76 mm Gun M1 was succeeded by the much bigger and better [[M3 (90 mm)]] that would be the armament of the [[M26|M26 Pershing]] and its [[M46|suc]][[M47|ces]][[M48A1|sors]]. | + | The 76 mm faced more than a fair share of criticism throughout its life. Promised to give a bigger punch than the 75 mm, it fell short with changing times against improving German armor as it was design created with a mindset of German armour in 1942. Still, as a tank gun, the 76 mm did its job as best it could against the opposition, and was still overall a better gun in several respects that after the war, the 76 mm were retained on the [[M4A3 (76) W|M4A3E8 Sherman]]. In the 1950s in the Korean War, the 76 mm still proved adequate against the Soviet [[T-34-85]] and no complaints were made on the Sherman's role as an infantry support during the latter stages of the war.<ref name="ZalogaM26vsT-34">Zaloga 2010</ref> Though, as the armament of the evolving U.S. tank force, the 76 mm Gun M1 was succeeded by the much bigger and better [[M3 (90 mm)|90 mm]] that would be the armament of the [[M26|M26 Pershing]] and its [[M46|suc]][[M47|ces]][[M48A1|sors]]. |
== Media == | == Media == | ||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
− | ''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:'' | + | <!--''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:'' |
* ''reference to the article about the variant of the cannon/machine gun;'' | * ''reference to the article about the variant of the cannon/machine gun;'' | ||
− | * ''references to approximate analogues by other nations and research trees.'' | + | * ''references to approximate analogues by other nations and research trees.''--> |
+ | * [[M7 (76 mm)]] - 3-inch cannon that shares identical ballistic performance as the 76 mm M1 | ||
== External links == | == External links == |
Revision as of 18:38, 5 February 2021
Contents
Description
The M1 (76 mm) is a high velocity gun developed by the United States during World War II. Intended to provide the M4 Sherman an increase in firepower to counter the increasing number of heavily armoured German tanks.The M1 in game is a very effective gun, with average penetration and high post penetration damage with the filler round. However, the vehicles it is mounted to can face tanks such as the Panther, Tiger I and Tiger II, which can prove to be difficult targets from a frontal encounter.
Vehicles equipped with this weapon
Vehicles equipped with this weapon | |
---|---|
Medium tanks | M4A1 (76) W · M4A2 (76) W · ▂M4A2 · M4A3 (76) W · ▅M4A3 (76) W · T20 |
Heavy tanks | M4A3E2 (76) W |
Tank destroyers | M18 GMC · M18 "Black Cat" · ␗M18 GMC · ▄M18 |
General info
The M1 (76 mm) is a very capable cannon and can disable or outright destroy most vehicles it can encounter in one shot. It is an ideal armament for mid-rank medium tanks and tank destroyers. For some heavily armoured vehicles, the user may have to aim for weak points or go for side shots.
Available ammunition
The M1 (76 mm) has five shell types available:
- The M62 shell comes stock with all tanks equipped with the M1 (76 mm) and is the primary shell players will wish to use. It has decent penetration for its rank, punching through 149 mm at 90° at point blank range, and a good amount of explosive filler, the equivalent of 63.7 grams of TNT. This shell will result in the ability to destroy enemy tanks with one successful penetration, but more spacious tanks will require more careful shot placement.
- The cannon also comes stock with the M42A1 high explosive shell, which has 390 grams of TNT, but is only effective on very lightly armoured vehicles and should not be used in the majority of cases.
- The M79 shot is unlocked as a tier II modification, and penetrates 134 mm of armour at 90° from 10 meters away. It also has no high explosive filler. This shell is inferior in most aspects compared to the M62 shell, and should not be used.
- The M93 APCR shot has 190 mm of penetration against 90° armour from 10 meters away, but is ineffective against sloped armour.
- The M88 Smoke Shell is a very handy munition and can be used for concealment or to blind opponents.
Shells such as the M79 shot, M93 APCR, and M88 Smoke Shell are available as modifications.
Penetration statistics | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm) | |||||
10 m | 100 m | 500 m | 1,000 m | 1,500 m | 2,000 m | ||
M62 shell | APCBC | 149 | 146 | 133 | 119 | 106 | 95 |
M42A1 shell | HE | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
M79 shot | AP | 134 | 132 | 121 | 109 | 99 | 89 |
M93 shot | APCR | 190 | 186 | 167 | 146 | 128 | 112 |
Shell details | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile Mass (kg) |
Fuse delay (m) |
Fuse sensitivity (mm) |
Explosive Mass (TNT equivalent) (g) |
Ricochet | ||
0% | 50% | 100% | |||||||
M62 shell | APCBC | 792 | 7.00 | 1.2 | 14.0 | 63.7 | 48° | 63° | 71° |
M42A1 shell | HE | 800 | 5.84 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 390 | 79° | 80° | 81° |
M79 shot | AP | 792 | 6.80 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 47° | 60° | 65° |
M93 shot | APCR | 1,036 | 4.22 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 66° | 70° | 72° |
Smoke shell characteristics | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile Mass (kg) |
Screen radius (m) |
Screen deploy time (s) |
Screen hold time (s) |
Explosive Mass (TNT equivalent) (g) |
M88 | 274 | 3.44 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 50 |
Comparison with analogues
The M1 (76 mm) has similar penetrative power to the 85 mm Soviet cannons like the D-5 and ZIS-S-53, but the 85mm has more penetration against sloped armour.
Usage in battles
The M1 (76 mm) is very capable for its rank and in battle it can be used to great effect. The cannon has great one-shot potential with the M62 shell, and it's usable in many situations. It is ideal for flanking, using the good penetration and post penetration damage to get around opponent's heavy front armour and hit them in their weaker side and rear armour.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Decent penetrative qualities
- Very good post-penetration damage
- Relatively short reload
Cons:
- Heavily armoured targets requires aiming for weak spots or maneuvring around to hit the side armour
History
Development
During the inter-war period, the Americans had access to the 3-inch Gun M1918 anti-aircraft gun in their inventory that fired a high-velocity 76.2 mm shell. In September 1940, it was decided to adapt the gun into an anti-tank role. Though the adaption was a success with a towed variant and mounted on the M10 tank destroyer, it was too heavy and cumbersome for a medium tank mount. Sometime in 1942, the development of a new gun to replace the 75 mm on the M4 Sherman's mount began as the 76 mm Gun T1. It should be noted that despite the name, it has the same exact bore as 3-inch (76.2 mm) and is only named such to avoid ammo compatibility error between the 3-inch and the 76 mm. The developed 76 mm used a barrel lighter than the 3-inch, had the breech ring assembly of the 75 mm, and could be mounted in the Sherman's M34 mount. The gun used the same projectiles as that of the 3-inch, but a different propellant case design with enough powder to fire a round at 2,600 ft/sec muzzle velocity, identical to the 3-inch gun.[1][2][3]
Two 76 mm T1 guns were made and shipped to Aberdeen Proving Grounds. Tests started on 01 August 1942, with one gun put on a fixed mount while the other was installed in a M4A1 turret in place of the 75 mm. Initial tests showed that the gun, 57 caliber in length, was too unbalanced. 15 inches were shaved off from the gun barrel, turning the barrel length to 52 caliber to the detriment of the anti-armour performance. Additionally, weight was added to the breech ring as a counter-weight.[3] On August 17, Aberdeen stated the 76 mm was satisfactory inside the M4 Sherman turret. Classified as Substitute Standard, the 76 mm T1 was approved as the 76 mm Gun M1 and it was recommended that the production orders for Shermans be modified for 1,000 Shermans with the new 76 mm gun. However, General Jacob Devers from Armored Force did not approve of this plan as the new tanks had not been tested by his board. This led to another trial period, with the 76 mm tried in the newer M34A1 gun mount using the telescopic sight, the response to the Sherman's combat experience in North Africa.[3] The same imbalance issue as previous tests arose, but this was solved by adding an 800 pound counterweight to the rear of the turret to counterbalance the barrel. Production of the tank started with 12 tanks from the Pressed Steel Car Company for evaluation by Aberdeen, Armored Board, and Tank Destroyer Board. These tanks arrived on 2 February 1943 and tests lasted until April 5th. The conclusion was that the Armored Board found the constrained space in the turret, caused by the larger gun, unsatisfactory and that the tank was a rushed "quick-fix" design and rejected the tank. This cancelled the type classification and brought the 76 mm tank procurement to a halt.[1]
Ordnance continued to tinker about with their designs and on 03 May 1943, recommended the production of two pilots of an improved 76 mm gun mount for the Sherman. These vehicles were designated as the M4E6 and were fitted with turrets from the T23, a variant of the T20 tank series.[1] Meanwhile, the 76 mm gun was also improved into the M1A1 variant with changes to the tube contour and a lengthened recoil surface to allow the trunnions to be moved forwards for better balancing of the weapon.[2] The two M4E6 were built by Chrysler, with one sent for evaluations at Aberdeen in July 1943 before being sent to Fort Knox for Armored Board to take a look.[1] The tests proved satisfactory and on 17 August 1943, Armored Board recommended the M4E6 be put into full production for 1,000 units, with even the possibility of completely replacing the 75 mm production with the 76 mm. The latter however was contested by General Alvan Gillem, who took over Devers role in May 1943, by stating the 76 mm's flaw of a lower HE charge compared to the 75 mm (76 mm's 12.37 lbs HE shell carries only 0.86 lbs explosives whereas the 75 mm's 14.6 lbs shell carries 1.47 lbs explosives) and its tendency to create dust clouds with its muzzle blast, all for only 1 more inch of armor penetration compared to the 75 mm.[3]
Still, 76 mm production was still in consideration and further improvements were made to the gun. The issue with the muzzle blast was solved with a new long primer ammunition that reduced the smoke left from the burning powder and the installment of a muzzle brake on the gun that diverted the muzzle blast sideways so it does not disturb the dust as much. The improvement of the muzzle brake led to the request that all 76 mm guns be fitted with a muzzle brake. 76 mm Gun M1 retooled with a threaded end for the muzzle brake were designated the M1A1C, though production of muzzle brakes for these threads did not begin until July 1944, so the threads were covered by a thread protector until muzzle brakes were available. The next model of the 76 mm, the 76 mm Gun M1A2, featured more improvements. The rifling on the gun was tighter with one turn per 32 caliber rather than one turn per 40 caliber on previous models, which helped improve ballistics at longer ranges. Every M1A2 design also had a muzzle brake attached.[1][3]
Combat usage
The first batch of 130 M4A1 (76) Shermans were sent to Britain on 10 April 1944, but despite their presence and even reports at the Italian Theater facing some of Germany's newer vehicles like the Panther, they were not sent to Normandy on the onset of D-Day. Major General Hugh Gaffey of the 2nd Armored Division advocated for this decision as there were only so few of them available, the troops were not properly trained on the new tank gun, and the logistic situation would be a mess to supply the new ammunition. As such, it was proposed by General W.B. Palmer that the 76 mm be delayed for tank battalions and only specified for such battalions rather than intermingling the 76 mm and 75 mm in mixed units. Either way, not one 76 mm Sherman landed in France in June 1944. Even attempts to interest the US Third Army on 12 June 1944 fell short as a report went "All of the commanders were reluctant to see it take the place of the 75 mm tank gun in any quantity". The reason for this desire to keep around with the 75 is the belief that the 75 mm could still do the job defeating enemy armour as the newer tanks, like the Tiger I since Tunisia, have been handled with the 75 mm cannon. Even the Panther were not taken seriously, not necessarily because it could be handled by the 75 mm, but because it was believed that Panther was a specialized heavy tank allocated in small numbers. It was not until Normandy that the U.S. fighting forces would experience first hand how numerous the Panthers were.[3]
By June 1944 in Normandy, criticism from tankers on the ineffectiveness of the 75 mm on the new Panthers came to light. On July 2, Eisenhower relayed the complaints to Ordnance and in July 12, a board was created to determine what weapons were available that could defeat the Panther. The board determined after tests that none of the U.S. standard weapons could defeat the Panther from the front, and the 3-inch on the M10 could only do so on the gun mantlet from 200 yards outs. Suddenly, the 76 mm Shermans sitting idly at Britain became very sought out and General Bradley of 1st US Army ordered as many of the 76 mm Shermans be sent into France for Operation Cobra. 102 M4A1 (76) tanks arrived to France and became a key part of the operation, marking their debut of combat on 25 July 1944 , the second day of the operation. The success of the operation helped vindicate the relevance of the 76 mm Sherman and new 76 mm tank models on the M4 and the M4A3 soon arrived in September 1944. However, the 76 mm Shermans, now combat tested, ended up in another pitfall when they still proved ineffective against the Panther's front. Eisenhower, when hearing of the issue, remarked on the predicament:
You mean our 76 won't knock these Panthers out? Why, I thought it was going to be the wonder gun of the war. Why is it that I'm the last to hear about this stuff? Ordnance told me this 76 would take care of anything the Germans had. Now I find you can't knock out a damn thing with it.
|
In August 1944, an improved ammunition for the 76 mm started to come in, the T4 (M93) HVAP ammo. With its tungsten ammunition, it could penetrate the Panther on the mantlet up to 1,000 yards out. 2,000 of the new HVAP ammo arrived by air in August 1944. Though 20,000 were ordered, the supply was never able to keep up with the demand. By February 1945, the average 76 mm tank have received a total of five HVAP round, meaning an acquiring rate of one HVAP per month a tank. A total of 18,000 HVAP came to Europe by March 1945, with 42% of the total being for the 76 mm and the rest for the 3-inch gun.[3]
The Battle of the Bulge turned a few heads for the 76 mm. Before that, German armour were only experienced in sporadic situations, with only minor counter-offensives at areas like the Battle of Arracourt. There were divided feelings about the 76 mm due to its decreased HE performance compared to the 75 mm, and that the 75 mm has specialized ammo like the white phosphorus round that the 76 did not have. Thus, proposals to completely replace the 75 with the 76 were met with objections. But after the Battle of the Bulge, the criticism changed to the inadequacy of the 75 mm against the German tanks like the Panther and the heavier Tiger II. 12th US Army Group on 29 January 1945 even requested that all US tanks that arrive in Europe be the 76 mm version, refusing anymore 75 mm Shermans.[3]
The 76 mm faced more than a fair share of criticism throughout its life. Promised to give a bigger punch than the 75 mm, it fell short with changing times against improving German armor as it was design created with a mindset of German armour in 1942. Still, as a tank gun, the 76 mm did its job as best it could against the opposition, and was still overall a better gun in several respects that after the war, the 76 mm were retained on the M4A3E8 Sherman. In the 1950s in the Korean War, the 76 mm still proved adequate against the Soviet T-34-85 and no complaints were made on the Sherman's role as an infantry support during the latter stages of the war.[5] Though, as the armament of the evolving U.S. tank force, the 76 mm Gun M1 was succeeded by the much bigger and better 90 mm that would be the armament of the M26 Pershing and its successors.
Media
- Videos
See also
- M7 (76 mm) - 3-inch cannon that shares identical ballistic performance as the 76 mm M1
External links
References
Bibliography
- Hunnicutt, R.P. Sherman: A History of the American Medium Tank U.S.A.: Feist Publications, 1978
- Hunnicutt, R.P. Pershing: A History of the Medium Tank T20 Series U.S.A.: Feist Publications, 1971
- Zaloga, Steven. M4 (76mm) Sherman Medium Tank 1943-65 Great Britain: Osprey Publishing Ltd., 2003
- Zaloga Steven. T-34-85 vs M26 Pershing: Korea 1950 Great Britain: Osprey Publishing Ltd., 2010
USA tank cannons | |
---|---|
20 mm | M139 |
25 mm | LW25 · M242 |
37 mm | M3 · M5 · M6 |
57 mm | M1 |
75 mm | M2 · M2 Howitzer · M3 · M6 · M1897A4 · XM274 |
76 mm | M1 · M7 · M32 · T185E1 |
90 mm | M3 · M3A1 · M36 · M41 · M54 · T15E1 · T15E2 · T54 · T208E9 |
105 mm | M4 · M68 · M68A1 · M68A1E8 · T5E1 · T5E2 · T140E2 · T140E3 · XM35 |
106 mm | M40A1C |
120 mm | M58 · M256 · T53 |
152 mm | M81 · M162 · XM150E5 |
155 mm | M185 · T7 |
165 mm | M135 |
Foreign: | |
20 mm | Rh202 (Germany) |
57 mm | 6pdr OQF Mk.III (Britain) · ZIS-2 (USSR) |
105 mm | Sharir (Israel) |
120 mm | IMI MG251 (Israel) |
USSR tank cannons | |
---|---|
20 mm | TNSh |
30 mm | 2A42 · 2A72 · AG-30 |
45 mm | 20-K |
57 mm | AU-220 · Ch-51M · ZIS-2 · ZIS-4 · ZIS-4M |
73 mm | 2A28 |
76 mm | 1902/30 · 3-K · D-56TS · F-32 · F-34 · F-96 · KT-28 · L-10 · L-11 · ZIS-3 · ZIS-5 |
85 mm | D-5S · D-5T · D-58 · D-70 · F-30 · ZIS-S-53 |
100 mm | 2A48 · 2A70 · D-10S · D-10T · D-10T2S · D-50 · LB-1 · S-34 |
107 mm | ZIS-6 |
115 mm | U-5TS |
122 mm | A-19 · D-25-44T · D-25S · D-25T · D-25TS · D-30T · D-49 · M-30 · M-62-T2S |
125 mm | 2A26 · 2A46 · 2A46M · 2A46M-1 · 2A46M-4 · 2A46M-5 · 2A46MS · 2A75 · D-126 |
130 mm | B-13 · C-70 · M-65 |
152 mm | 2A33 · LP-83 · M-10T · M-64 · M-69 · ML-20S |
Foreign: | |
37 mm | M5 (USA) |
50 mm | KwK L/42 (Germany) |
57 mm | 6pdr OQF Mk.III (Britain) · M1 (USA) |
75 mm | KwK42 (Germany) · M2 (USA) |
76 mm | M1 (USA) |
85 mm | Type-62-85-TC (China) |
Japan tank cannons | |
---|---|
37 mm | Type 94 · Type 100 · Type 1 |
47 mm | Type 1 |
57 mm | Type 90 · Type 97 |
70 mm | Type 94 |
75 mm | Type 90 · Type 99 · Type 3 · Type 5 (Type I Model II · Type II Model I · Type II Model II) |
90 mm | Type 61 |
105 mm | Type 5 (Experimental · Production) · JSW L/52 |
106 mm | Type 60 (B) |
120 mm | Taishō Type 10 · Navy short gun · Type 90 L/44 · Type 10 L/44 |
150 mm | Type 38 |
155 mm | NSJ L/30 · JSW L/52 |
Foreign: | |
25 mm | Oerlikon KBA B02 (Switzerland) |
30 mm | Bushmaster 2 Mk.44 (USA) |
35 mm | Oerlikon KDE (Switzerland) |
75 mm | M6 (USA) |
76 mm | M1 (USA) · M32 (USA) |
88 mm | KwK36 (Germany) |
90 mm | M3A1 (USA) · M36 (USA) |
105 mm | L7A3 (Germany) |
120 mm | Schneider-Canet 1898 (France) |
China tank cannons | |
---|---|
30 mm | ZPL02 · ZPZ02 |
73 mm | Type 86 |
76 mm | M32K1 |
85 mm | Type 56 · Type 63 |
100 mm | PTP86 · Type 59 · Type 69 · Type 69-II · ZPL04 |
105 mm | 88B-105T · Type 83 · WMA301 · ZPL94 · ZPL98A |
120 mm | 122TM · PTZ89 |
125 mm | Type 88C · Type 99A · ZPT98 |
130 mm | PL59A Gai |
152 mm | PL66 Gai |
Foreign: | |
20 mm | KwK30 (Germany) |
37 mm | M6 (USA) |
45 mm | 20-K (USSR) |
47 mm | Type 1 (Japan) |
57 mm | Type 97 (Japan) · ZIS-2 (USSR) |
75 mm | M2 Howitzer (USA) · M3 (USA) · M6 (USA) |
76 mm | D-56T (USSR) · F-34 (USSR) · M1 (USA) · M7 (USA) · ZIS-3 (USSR) |
85 mm | ZIS-S-53 (USSR) |
90 mm | M3 (USA) · M41 (USA) |
100 mm | D-10S (USSR) |
105 mm | M68 (USA) · M68A1 (USA) |
115 mm | U-5TS (USSR) |
122 mm | A-19 (USSR) · D-25T (USSR) |
152 mm | ML-20S (USSR) |