Difference between revisions of "H.C. Mk.II (4,000 lb)"
Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 146838 by U119478520 (talk)) |
FieryFag1234 (talk | contribs) (→History) (Tag: Visual edit) |
||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| − | + | in the late 1930s, the RAF found itself without a proper heavy bomb because at the time they had only small bombs up to and around 1000lb. At this point Vickers were developing a 1800lb bomb for use *note: expand during future edits | |
| + | |||
| + | Extensive aerodynamic streamlining was dispensed with since these bombs were carried internally. As already mentioned the 4,000 lb ‘Block Buster’ or ‘Cookie’ was a very effective weapon in this class and after its introduction rapidly became a mainstay of Bomber Command. | ||
| + | |||
| + | https://weaponsandwarfare.com/15985-2/''.'' | ||
== Media == | == Media == | ||
| Line 81: | Line 85: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
''Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:'' | ''Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:'' | ||
| + | |||
* ''topic on the official game forum;'' | * ''topic on the official game forum;'' | ||
* ''other literature.'' | * ''other literature.'' | ||
Revision as of 09:48, 30 November 2022
Contents
Description
.png)
Write an introduction to the article in 2-3 small paragraphs. Briefly tell us about the history of the development and combat using the weaponry and also about its features. Compile a list of air, ground, or naval vehicles that feature this weapon system in the game.
Vehicles equipped with this weapon
- Canberra B Mk 2
- Lancaster B Mk I
- Lancaster B Mk III
- Wellington Mk Ic
- Wellington Mk Ic/L
- Wellington Mk III
- Wellington Mk X
General info
| Bomb characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Mass | 1,782.6 kg (3,930 lbs) |
| Explosive mass | 1,339 kg |
| Explosive type | Amatol |
| TNT equivalent | 1,339 kg |
| HE max penetration | 178 mm |
| Armour destruction radius | 39 m |
| Fragment dispersion radius | 251 m |
Effective damage
Describe the type of damage produced by this type of bomb (high explosive, splash damage, etc)
Comparison with analogues
Give a comparative description of bombs that have firepower equal to this weapon.
Usage in battles
Air battles
The 4,000 lb "cookie" bomb is best used to destroy bases. In later appearances of this weapon such as the Lancaster, it can destroy a normal base but may struggle on maps with respawning bases. It can be used for airfield bombing although multiple bombs will be required. It can also be used to bomb vehicle columns although this is not advised unless at low altitude to assure a direct hit.
Ground battles
This bomb can be used for the large scale destruction of clustered armoured targets. If used at its lowest BR, it will face mostly light vehicles, increasing its potency.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Large explosive radius
- Effective against armoured targets
Cons:
- Significantly hinders flight performance
- Only 1 or 2 bombs per bomber
History
in the late 1930s, the RAF found itself without a proper heavy bomb because at the time they had only small bombs up to and around 1000lb. At this point Vickers were developing a 1800lb bomb for use *note: expand during future edits
Extensive aerodynamic streamlining was dispensed with since these bombs were carried internally. As already mentioned the 4,000 lb ‘Block Buster’ or ‘Cookie’ was a very effective weapon in this class and after its introduction rapidly became a mainstay of Bomber Command.
https://weaponsandwarfare.com/15985-2/.
Media
Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.
See also
External links
Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:
- topic on the official game forum;
- other literature.
