Difference between revisions of "JH-7A"

From War Thunder Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(adding the history of JH-7 and 7A (provision for possible additions of JH-7))
(Revisions to the lines of lacking AGMs)
Line 148: Line 148:
 
* 8 x 500 kg 500-3 bombs (4,000 kg total)
 
* 8 x 500 kg 500-3 bombs (4,000 kg total)
 
* 8 x 500 kg 500-4 bombs (4,000 kg total)
 
* 8 x 500 kg 500-4 bombs (4,000 kg total)
 +
* 2 x Kh-29T missiles
 
* 4 x 570 kg GB-500J bombs + 1 x K/ADC03A targeting pod (2,280 kg total)
 
* 4 x 570 kg GB-500J bombs + 1 x K/ADC03A targeting pod (2,280 kg total)
 
* 4 x 1,090 kg GB-1000J bombs + 1 x K/ADC03A targeting pod (4,360 kg total)
 
* 4 x 1,090 kg GB-1000J bombs + 1 x K/ADC03A targeting pod (4,360 kg total)
Line 160: Line 161:
 
The JH-7A can be said to be the one and only dedicated attacker of the PLANAF/PLAAF that fits the description of a "bomb truck". While primarily designed to target surface warships, ground attack missions are also within its scope, boasting the highest payload of all Chinese jets (up to 22 x 250 kg unguided bombs). This high payload, combined with its speed, makes base bombing a breeze.
 
The JH-7A can be said to be the one and only dedicated attacker of the PLANAF/PLAAF that fits the description of a "bomb truck". While primarily designed to target surface warships, ground attack missions are also within its scope, boasting the highest payload of all Chinese jets (up to 22 x 250 kg unguided bombs). This high payload, combined with its speed, makes base bombing a breeze.
  
However, the JH-7 is also able to operate well in its dual role as a fighter, thanks to new composite materials, FBW, and its mostly well-designed aerodynamic features. While it will often encounter more advanced fighters like the MiG-29 series and F-16 series, which pose significant threats from longer ranges, the JH-7A excels against adversaries at its tier. Despite its considerable size, it has the ability to stick on the tail of enemy jets, pulling AoA for increased firing opportunities, while having the acceleration recover or disengage when necessary. The PL-5C and PL-8 IR AAMs are both strong missiles. However, only being able to carry two PL-8, it can be recommended to reserve them for engaging longer-range targets, and using the PL-5Cs for most other scenarios. The PL-5B, a rear-aspect missile, can also be effective against careless targets due to its impressive thrust and range.
+
However, the JH-7 is also able to operate well in its dual role as a fighter, thanks to new composite materials, FBW, and its mostly well-designed aerodynamic features. While it will often encounter more advanced fighters like the MiG-29 series and F-16 series, which pose significant threats from longer ranges, the JH-7A excels against adversaries at its tier. Despite its considerable size, it has the ability to stick on the tail of enemy jets, pulling AoA for increased firing opportunities, while having the acceleration recover or disengage when necessary. The PL-5C and PL-8 IR AAMs are both strong missiles. However, only being able to carry two PL-8, it can be recommended to reserve them for engaging longer-range targets, and using the PL-5Cs for most other scenarios. The PL-5B, a rear-aspect missile, can also be effective against careless targets thanks to its impressive thrust and range.
  
 
To maximize the JH-7A's capabilities, it is crucial to bear in mind the manoeuvrability limitations inherent in high-wing aircraft. Pilots should exercise caution regarding altitude when engaging both ground and aerial targets, particularly during dogfights, where the JH-7A requires additional altitude for recovery.
 
To maximize the JH-7A's capabilities, it is crucial to bear in mind the manoeuvrability limitations inherent in high-wing aircraft. Pilots should exercise caution regarding altitude when engaging both ground and aerial targets, particularly during dogfights, where the JH-7A requires additional altitude for recovery.
  
 
==== The taste of one's own medicine ====
 
==== The taste of one's own medicine ====
In combined battles, the JH-7A presents some advantages over alternative options such as the F-16A MLU and Q-5L. Although the JH-7A also lacks advanced AGMs like the K/AKD88, it compensates with up to four player-selected LGBs, including the well-known GB-500J and the one-ton GB-1000J, along with up to 22 unguided bombs for numerous devastating strikes. 90 mm or 130 mm rocket pods remain an option as well.
+
In combined battles, the JH-7A presents some advantages over alternative options such as the F-16A MLU and Q-5L. It has a vast arsenal of weaponry including  up to six player-selected LGBs, scaling from 250 kg, 500 kg and 1 ton-class bombs, along with up to 22 unguided bombs for numerous devastating strikes. Images of recent years from PLA photographer also hinted the possibility to equip Russian Kh-29T AGM which further boost its engagement range; lastly, 90 mm or 130 mm rocket pods remain an option as well.
  
For Chinese tech-tree players, the JH-7A presents the opportunity to give enemies with more advanced multirole jets a taste of their own medicine. Equipped with the advanced K/ADC03A targeting pod with high-definition and zoom and a 2nd gen TVD for target acquisition, the JH-7A's life is made considerably easier when locating ground targets. Diving for the target and tossing bombs is effective, but for increased safety, pulling up after dropping bombs and flying sideways while maintaining a lock on the target is recommended. The 500 kg LGB is formidable, capable of neutralizing even the most heavily armoured MBTs, and the 1-ton LGB can eliminate multiple targets within a reasonable radius, especially a cluster of SPAA.
+
For Chinese tech-tree players, the JH-7A presents the opportunity to give enemies with more advanced multirole jets a taste of their own medicine. Equipped with the advanced K/ADC03A targeting pod with high-definition and zoom and a 2nd gen TVD for target acquisition, the JH-7A's life is made considerably easier when locating ground targets. Diving for the target and tossing bombs is effective, but for increased safety, pulling up after dropping bombs and flying sideways while maintaining a lock on the target is recommended. Depending on the quantity of enemy vehicles and their location, players can either pick six GB 250 for maximum efficiency, any precise hits within 3 m radius of enemy can terminate their service immediately; while bringing heavier GB 500/1000 will make sure enemies in a certain radius can face their ultimate demise, especially with GB 1000, which can be said as the ultimate solution against the toughest MBTs of its BR. Alternatively, thanks to FCS upgrades, JH-7A can also equip Russian Kh-29T; instead of HEAT warhead, Kh-29T is filled with explosives for maximum efficiency against ground targets, it is more akin to an universal missile against stationary targets and slow-moving vehicles. Make sure to check the weather of the map as TV cameras can be interfered by clouds and smog, as long as enemy targets did not take cover, a precise hit from the high ballistics of this missile can make sure it can neutralize designated targets.
  
Utilizing unguided bombs from low altitudes also remains a viable strategy; be sure to know where the locations of the enemy's major forces and avoid SPAAs, anti-air capable attack helicopters, and other jets at all costs. CCRP can aid in destroying stationary targets, provided the area is locked before bombs are released. Despite lacking long-range AGMs for the safest approach, the JH-7A can also employ unguided rockets as a little extra firepower against unaware SPAAs or light vehicles when bombs are depleted, supporting friendly jets and helicopters by eliminating potential threats.
+
Utilizing unguided bombs from low altitudes also remains a viable strategy; be sure to know where the locations of the enemy's major forces and avoid SPAAs, anti-air capable attack helicopters, and other jets at all costs. CCRP can aid in destroying stationary targets, provided the area is locked before bombs are released. Despite lacking long-range AGMs for the safest approach, the JH-7A can also employ unguided rockets as a little extra firepower against unaware SPAAs or light vehicles when bombs are depleted, supporting friendly jets and helicopters by eliminating potential threats.
  
 
The JH-7A can equip its full complement of air-to-air missiles with minimal overlap with bomb and rocket pylons, allowing it to defend against menacing enemy jets. The tactics will be very similar to air battles, while also having to be wary of enemy SPAAs: sneak up on enemies to deliver the fatal blow.
 
The JH-7A can equip its full complement of air-to-air missiles with minimal overlap with bomb and rocket pylons, allowing it to defend against menacing enemy jets. The tactics will be very similar to air battles, while also having to be wary of enemy SPAAs: sneak up on enemies to deliver the fatal blow.
Line 180: Line 181:
 
'''Pros:'''
 
'''Pros:'''
  
* Excellent payload with varieties of bombs and rockets
+
* Excellent payload with varieties of bombs, AGM and rockets
 
* Great self-defense IR AAM options
 
* Great self-defense IR AAM options
 
* Great acceleration thanks to the FWS-9 turbofan engines
 
* Great acceleration thanks to the FWS-9 turbofan engines
Line 193: Line 194:
 
* Rather huge target
 
* Rather huge target
 
* Needs more altitude to recover due to high wing design
 
* Needs more altitude to recover due to high wing design
* Lacks AGM for long-range engagements
 
 
* Long learning curve for the placement of 23 mm autocannon
 
* Long learning curve for the placement of 23 mm autocannon
  
Line 199: Line 199:
 
<!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the aircraft in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).'' -->
 
<!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the aircraft in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the vehicle and adding a block "/History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>. This section may also include the vehicle's dev blog entry (if applicable) and the in-game encyclopedia description (under <code><nowiki>=== In-game description ===</nowiki></code>, also if applicable).'' -->
 
==== What the Aviation Forces Lack ====
 
==== What the Aviation Forces Lack ====
As Mainland China has already developed domestic attacker, namely the [[Q-5 (Family)|Q-5 series]] from Nanchang, there were already needs for a land-based naval aircraft for ship attacking operations i.e. Q-5Yi (强-5乙), probably the very last torpedo bomber ever designed. Soon after the Sino-Vietnamese (with RVN) conflicts of 1974, PLAN found a major piece of puzzle lacking for their South China Sea composition: an attacker capable of launching AShM for standoff operations while able to fly supersonic; while PLAAF also called for a new supersonic attacker to replace the H-5 fleet against the menacing Soviet forces. Thus Chinese military commands listed their requirements for the new attacker by 1976 where the CMC called for a new jet for both aviation forces under the same airframe and capable to defend itself from enemy interceptors while maintaining sufficiently high payload; with Chen Yijian 陈一坚 in lead, XAC was approved for the new bomber on October 1977, while the requirements were also given to SAC and NAMC respectively ''(note from editor: CAC was working on the J-9 and J-13 program led by Song Wencong 宋文骢, future chief engineer of J-10)'', leading to a "civil-war" and probably the very first competition of aircrafts between Chinese manufacturers.
+
As Mainland China has already developed domestic attacker, namely the [[Q-5 (Family)|Q-5 series]] from Nanchang, there were already needs for a land-based naval aircraft for ship attacking operations i.e. Q-5Yi (强-5乙), probably the very last torpedo bomber ever designed. Soon after the Sino-Vietnamese (with RVN) conflicts of 1974, PLAN found a major piece of puzzle lacking for their South China Sea composition: an attacker capable of launching AShM for standoff operations while able to fly supersonic; while PLAAF also called for a new supersonic attacker to replace the H-5 fleet against the menacing Soviet forces. Thus Chinese military commands listed their requirements for the new attacker by 1976 where the CMC called for a new jet for both aviation forces under the same airframe and capable to defend itself from enemy interceptors while maintaining sufficiently high payload; with Chen Yijian 陈一坚 in lead, XAC was approved for the new bomber on October 1977, while the requirements were also given to SAC and NAMC respectively ''(note from editor: CAC was working on the J-9 program led by Song Wencong 宋文骢, future chief engineer of J-10)'', leading to a "civil-war" and probably the very first competition of aircrafts between Chinese manufacturers.
  
 
==== The Winner of the trio : JH-7 ====
 
==== The Winner of the trio : JH-7 ====
As the program for new supersonic attacker went on, there were 3 schemes for PLAAF and PLAN command: the first one was the '''H-7 (轰-7)''' led by Chen Yijian with the design of JH-7 for the time being ''(the LRIP series of JH-7 of 1990s)''; '''JH-8 (歼轰-8)''' by SAC led by Gu Songfeng ''(顾诵芬, chief designer of J-8 series)'' with the iconic side intake of what-would-become J-8II in 1984 and the ambitious '''Q-6 (强-6)''' by Lu Xiaopeng ''(陆孝鹏, designer of Q-5 and J-12)'' with side intakes and variable swept wings inspired from the MiG-23MS acquired from Egypt. As for JH-8, the design would decrease its ceiling, radius wasn't considered a good idea for an attacker; while Q-6 was way too ambitious with its powerplant and structure, which were deemed not possible for Mainland China for the era especially during economic reforms where many new technologies have to give the way for the economy. Thus, the design from XAC, H-7, eventually won the competition with better subsonic drag than the JH-8 design.
+
As the program for new supersonic attacker went on, there were 3 schemes for PLAAF and PLAN command: the first one was the '''H-7 (轰-7)''' led by Chen Yijian with the design of JH-7 for the time being ''(the LRIP series of JH-7 of 1990s)''; '''JH-8 (歼轰-8)''' by SAC led by Gu Songfeng ''(顾诵芬, chief designer of J-8 series)'' with the iconic side intake of what-would-become J-8II in 1984 and the ambitious '''Q-6 (强-6)''' by Lu Xiaopeng ''(陆孝鹏, designer of Q-5 and J-12)'' with side intakes and variable swept wings inspired from the MiG-23MS acquired from Egypt. As for JH-8, the design would decrease its ceiling, radius wasn't considered a good idea for an attacker; while Q-6 was way too ambitious with its powerplant and structure, which were deemed not possible for Mainland China for the era especially during economic reforms where many new technologies have to give the way for the economy. Thus, the design from XAC, H-7, eventually won the competition with lower subsonic drag than the JH-8 design.
  
Due to the design philosophy differences between PLAAF and PLANAF (Side-by-side vs tandem cockpit), PLAAF eventually quit the H-7 program and PLANAF's scheme won the overall design for the new jet. The new jet would utilize the 50 imported, used RR Spey RB.168 MK.202 from Great Britain as the new powerplant (which was intended for the J-13 program); while a H-5 named "Eagle" (鹰式武器试验机) would test the Type 232H PD radar and the AShM for future aircrafts. By a certain exhibition in 1988, Ministry of Aviation Industry (soon AVIC) exhibited the B-7 prototype to the public at its 1/100th prototype; while its prototypes made it to the skies in 1990s with fatalities during test flight (085 prototype with the pilot duo), the new JH-7 joined PLANAF service by late 1990s during a certain Zhuhai Airshow as the '''FBC-1''' fighter-bomber with only provisions of 18 production aircrafts due to the engine supplies.  
+
Due to the design philosophy differences between PLAAF and PLANAF (Side-by-side vs tandem cockpit), PLAAF eventually quit the H-7 program and PLANAF's scheme won the overall design for the new jet. The new jet would utilize the 50 imported, used RR Spey RB.168 MK.202 from Great Britain as the new powerplant ''(which was intended for the J-13 program)''; while a H-5 named "Eagle" (鹰式武器试验机) would test the Type 232H PD radar and the AShM for future aircrafts. By a certain exhibition in 1988, Ministry of Aviation Industry ''(soon AVIC)'' exhibited the B-7 prototype to the public at its 1/100th prototype; while its prototypes made it to the skies in 1990s with fatalities during test flight ''(085 prototype with the pilot duo)'', the new JH-7 joined PLANAF service by late 1990s during a certain Zhuhai Airshow as the '''FBC-1''' fighter-bomber with only provisions of 18 production aircrafts due to the engine supplies.  
  
 
==== The Ultimate Form - JH-7A ====
 
==== The Ultimate Form - JH-7A ====
As the introduction of Su-30MKK Flanker-H to PLANAF by late 1990s, PLANAF sought for utilizing the JH-7 platform for their latest AShM as well as provisions for BVR capabilities to fulfill the abbreviation "J" ''(歼, '''interceptors''')''; as well as the testbed of JL-10A radar as the alternative to CAC's J-10 program ''(which the Type 1473 was certified)''. This was also one of the new jets to utilize the PLAAF equivalent of NATO MIL-STD-1553B main data bus, MFDs and HUD; as well as a new FBW control as the backup for J-10, these features eventually become the foundations of the new JH-7A fighter-bomber utilizing CAD design via Dassault CATID V3, new pair of tail fins, as well as removed wing fences. First flown by early 2000s, JH-7A earned both the orders from PLANAF and PLAAF, distinguished by the red numberings (PLANAF) and yellow numbering (PLAAF) thanks to its multirole missions; although incidents have caused lives of PLA pilots through its service up to this date, it has still been a humble yet effective fighter-bomber for the aviation forces of PLA and a delivery platform of some latest airborne AShM, AGM or ALCM ''(air-launched cruise missile)'' platforms.
+
As the introduction of Su-30MKK Flanker-H to PLANAF by late 1990s, PLANAF sought for utilizing the JH-7 platform for their latest AShM as well as provisions for BVR capabilities to fulfill the abbreviation "J" ''(歼, '''interceptors''')''; as well as the testbed of JL-10A radar as the alternative to CAC's J-10 program ''(which the Type 1473 was certified)''. This was also one of the new jets to utilize the PLAAF equivalent of NATO MIL-STD-1553B main data bus, MFDs and HUD; as well as a new FBW control as the backup for J-10, these features eventually become the foundations of the new JH-7A fighter-bomber utilizing CAD design via Dassault CATID V3, new pair of tail fins, as well as removed wing fences. First flown by early 2000s, JH-7A earned both the orders from PLANAF and PLAAF, distinguished by the red numberings (PLANAF) and yellow numbering (PLAAF) thanks to its multirole missions; although incidents have caused lives of PLA pilots through its service up to this date, it has still been a humble yet effective fighter-bomber for the aviation forces of PLA and a delivery platform (under the JH-7AII upgrade) of some latest airborne AShM, AGM or ALCM ''(air-launched cruise missile)'' platforms.
  
 
=== [[wt:en/news/8546-development-jh-7a-the-flying-leopard-en|Devblog]] ===
 
=== [[wt:en/news/8546-development-jh-7a-the-flying-leopard-en|Devblog]] ===

Revision as of 15:47, 14 December 2023

Rank VI USA | Premium | Golden Eagles
A-10A Thunderbolt (Early)
JH-7A
jh_7a.png
GarageImage JH-7A.jpg
JH-7A
AB RB SB
11.3 11.7 11.7
Research:400 000 Specs-Card-Exp.png
Purchase:1 080 000 Specs-Card-Lion.png
Show in game

Description

Due to the advent of the latest US and Russian strike aircraft projects of the time, such as the F-15E and the Su-34, China quickly realized their Q-5 fleet was technologically behind. Building a new supersonic heavy strike aircraft was no easy task, especially for China which had started the program lacking the required technological advancements to complete it. The development program began in the late 1980s as China aimed to bolster its naval aviation capabilities. This twin-engine, two-seat fighter-bomber was designed by the Nanchang Aircraft Corporation and later upgraded by the Xi'an Aircraft Corporation. The initial variant, the JH-7, first flew in 1988. It was equipped with a variety of systems, including the JL-10A radar and various electronic countermeasures, making it a versatile platform for ground attack and maritime strike missions. The JH-7 program faced many challenges, but by 1992, the first serial production variant of the JH-7, the JH-7A, officially entered service, where it played a significant role in modernizing China's naval air forces and showcasing their ambitions in the world of military aviation. While not as famous as other strike aircraft of its era, the JH-7 series is a noteworthy example of China's incredible strides in defense technology.

The JH-7A Flying Leopard II (歼轰-7A型歼击轰炸机; unified NATO reporting name: Flounder) was introduced in Update "Kings of Battle". Being a dedicated strike-fighter, the JH-7A specializes in the ground-strike role, and suffers in dedicated air-to-air combat at its battle rating, despite having access to the formidable PL-8 and PL-5C all aspect missiles. As such, this aircraft can struggle in dedicated air modes, and instead shines the brightest in mixed battles thanks to its selection of precision ground ordnance and powerful targeting pod. The strong radar and all-aspect missiles can prove to be a strong form of self-defence in mixed battles if the need arises. All in all, the JH-7A serves as a major upgrade in technology and capability over its predecessors in the tech tree, namely the Q-5 family.

General info

Flight performance

Arrestor gear
Accelerates braking by grabbing the brake cable on the deck of the aircraft carrier
Air brakes
Allows you to dramatically reduce the flight speed by releasing special flaps
Drogue parachute
Reduces braking distance when landing on any runway
Max speed
at 12 000 m1 870 km/h
Turn time29 s
Max altitude15 000 m
Engine2 х XAEC WS-9
TypeJet
Cooling systemAir
Take-off weight29 t

At first glance, players will see some similarities between the JH-7A and Jaguar, the latter being one of the targets the JH-7 aimed for during design (the other is Tornado IDS for its great payload). Due to the need to carry heavy ordnance such as AShMs and future provisions for AGMs, the JH-7A's size is still one of the largest among domestically designed PLANAF/PLAAF jets (even the largest J-20 is shorter than JH-7A by 2 metres). To mitigate the possible problems from its sheer size, the JH-7 series are powered by two FWS-9 Qinling turbofan engines (licensed Rolls-Royce Spey RB.168 Mk.202), with the JH-7A eventually using the completely domestic version. As such, it not only provides very high acceleration at any altitude, it can also maintain manoeuvrability when it has the need for occasional dogfights; thanks to the high wing design, it does have higher instantaneous AoA when facing manoeuvring targets. The very high acceleration also helps to push the jet to up to Mach 1.6 with only AAMs. It can still fly at supersonic speeds even at full-load; this also enables JH-7A to get to enemy bases as fast as it possible with sufficient payload for 2 bases.

However, the high wing design also brings a potentially fatal trait: poor low-speed and low-altitude manoeuvrability. This is a trait that also costed lives of PLAAF/PLANAF pilots as high wing jets will lose lift in the aforementioned scenarios, mostly during recovery from ground attacks or landing, thus players have to be more careful during such cases; if the terrain doesn't allow for a safe attack run, it's better to recover earlier and do not pull too much when doing so.

Characteristics Max speed
(km/h at _,___ m)
Max altitude
(metres)
Turn time
(seconds)
Rate of climb
(metres/second)
Take-off run
(metres)
AB RB AB RB AB RB
Stock ___ ___ 15000 __._ __._ __._ __._ ___
Upgraded ___ ___ __._ __._ __._ __._

Details

Features
Combat flaps Take-off flaps Landing flaps Air brakes Arrestor gear Drogue chute
X
Limits
Wings (km/h) Gear (km/h) Flaps (km/h) Max Static G
Combat Take-off Landing + -
1,331 450 717 673 450 ~__ ~__
Optimal velocities (km/h)
Ailerons Rudder Elevators Radiator
< ___ < ___ < ___ -

Engine performance

Engine Aircraft mass
Engine name Number Basic mass Wing loading (full fuel)
_____ _ _,___ kg ___ kg/m2
Engine characteristics Mass with fuel (no weapons load) Max Gross
Weight
Weight (each) Type _m fuel __m fuel __m fuel
___ kg ___ _,___ kg _,___ kg _,___ kg _,___ kg
Maximum engine thrust @ 0 m (RB/SB) Thrust to weight ratio @ 0 m (___%/WEP)
Condition 100% ___%/WEP _m fuel __m fuel __m fuel MGW
Stationary ___ kgf ___ kgf _.__ _.__ _.__ _.__
Optimal ___ kgf
(_ km/h)
___ kgf
(_ km/h)
_.__ _.__ _.__ _.__

Survivability and armour

Flares/Chaff
Aircraft countermeasures to distract IR and radar-guided missiles and also AA radar
Crew2 people
Speed of destruction
Structural0 km/h
Gear450 km/h

Aside from self-sealing fuel tanks which are common for jets after the 1950s, due to the need for ground attack and potential AA threats, the cockpit is surrounded by armour plates at 10-16 mm (albeit not up front); while the front fuselage tank is also protected by an armour plate at 10 mm by the belly.

Meanwhile, the JH-7A has 84 countermeasures installed; for most cases, these large calibre countermeasures can allow it to easily evade incoming missiles, but players will still have to plan ahead and manoeuvre to maximize the efficiency of CMs.

Modifications and economy

Repair costBasic → Reference
AB2 922 → 4 403 Sl icon.png
RB7 391 → 11 138 Sl icon.png
SB10 478 → 15 790 Sl icon.png
Total cost of modifications310 600 Rp icon.png
477 000 Sl icon.png
Talisman cost3 100 Ge icon.png
Crew training310 000 Sl icon.png
Experts1 080 000 Sl icon.png
Aces3 400 Ge icon.png
Research Aces1 280 000 Rp icon.png
Reward for battleAB / RB / SB
90 / 340 / 600 % Sl icon.png
250 / 250 / 250 % Rp icon.png
Modifications
Flight performance Survivability Weaponry
Mods jet compressor.png
Compressor
Research:
8 800 Rp icon.png
Cost:
14 000 Sl icon.png
350 Ge icon.png
Mods booster.png
New boosters
Research:
12 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
18 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mods jet engine.png
Engine
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
680 Ge icon.png
Mods aerodinamic fuse.png
Fuselage repair
Research:
8 800 Rp icon.png
Cost:
14 000 Sl icon.png
350 Ge icon.png
Mods armor frame.png
Airframe
Research:
12 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
18 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mods aerodinamic wing.png
Wings repair
Research:
15 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
23 000 Sl icon.png
600 Ge icon.png
Mods armor cover.png
Cover
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
680 Ge icon.png
Mods heli false thermal targets.png
Flares/Chaff
Research:
8 800 Rp icon.png
Cost:
14 000 Sl icon.png
350 Ge icon.png
Mods ammo.png
ns23_belt_pack
Research:
8 800 Rp icon.png
Cost:
14 000 Sl icon.png
350 Ge icon.png
Mod arrow 1.png
Mods pilon block rocket.png
HF-6
Research:
8 800 Rp icon.png
Cost:
14 000 Sl icon.png
350 Ge icon.png
Mod arrow 0.png
Mods thermal sight.png
K/ADC03A
Research:
8 800 Rp icon.png
Cost:
14 000 Sl icon.png
350 Ge icon.png
Mod arrow 0.png
Mods air to air missile.png
PL-5B
Research:
8 800 Rp icon.png
Cost:
14 000 Sl icon.png
350 Ge icon.png
Mod arrow 0.png
Mods g suit.png
G-suit
Research:
12 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
18 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mods pilon block rocket large.png
HF-14
Research:
12 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
18 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mods laser guided bomb.png
GB250
Research:
12 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
18 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mod arrow 0.png
Mods air to air missile.png
PL-5C
Research:
12 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
18 000 Sl icon.png
480 Ge icon.png
Mod arrow 0.png
Mods weapon.png
ns23_new_gun
Research:
15 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
23 000 Sl icon.png
600 Ge icon.png
Mods pilon bomb.png
Type 250
Research:
15 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
23 000 Sl icon.png
600 Ge icon.png
Mod arrow 0.png
Mods laser guided bomb.png
GB500
Research:
15 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
23 000 Sl icon.png
600 Ge icon.png
Mod arrow 0.png
Mods air to air missile.png
PL-8
Research:
15 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
23 000 Sl icon.png
600 Ge icon.png
Mods jet engine extinguisher.png
EFS
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
680 Ge icon.png
Mods agm missile.png
Kh-29T
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
680 Ge icon.png
Mods pilon bomb.png
Type 500
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
680 Ge icon.png
Mods laser guided bomb.png
GB1000
Research:
17 000 Rp icon.png
Cost:
26 000 Sl icon.png
680 Ge icon.png

Armaments

Offensive armament

Main article: Type 23-3 (23 mm)

The JH-7A is armed with:

  • 1 x 23 mm Type 23-3 cannon, belly-mounted (200 rpg)
  • 84 x large calibre countermeasures

Suspended armament

The JH-7A can be outfitted with the following ordnance:

Default weapon presets
  • Without load
  • 2 x PL-5C missiles
  • 4 x PL-5C missiles
  • 4 x PL-5B missiles
  • 2 x PL-8 missiles
  • 16 x Type 130-2 rockets
  • 42 x Type 90-1 rockets
  • 22 x 250 kg 250-3 bombs (5,500 kg total)
  • 22 x 250 kg 250-4 bombs (5,500 kg total)
  • 8 x 500 kg 500-3 bombs (4,000 kg total)
  • 8 x 500 kg 500-4 bombs (4,000 kg total)
  • 2 x Kh-29T missiles
  • 4 x 570 kg GB-500J bombs + 1 x K/ADC03A targeting pod (2,280 kg total)
  • 4 x 1,090 kg GB-1000J bombs + 1 x K/ADC03A targeting pod (4,360 kg total)

Usage in battles

The JH-7A vastly upgrades the arsenal of the PLAAF/PLANAF with its great selection of bombs and self-defense IR AAMs, as well as its great manoeuvrability thanks to its aerodynamic design and powerful turbofan engines. While pilots will need to be careful of the aircraft's sheer size and poor low-altitude manoeuvrability, most of the time both ground and aerial targets will have quite a bad day facing a well-piloted JH-7A.

Supersonic bomb truck

The JH-7A can be said to be the one and only dedicated attacker of the PLANAF/PLAAF that fits the description of a "bomb truck". While primarily designed to target surface warships, ground attack missions are also within its scope, boasting the highest payload of all Chinese jets (up to 22 x 250 kg unguided bombs). This high payload, combined with its speed, makes base bombing a breeze.

However, the JH-7 is also able to operate well in its dual role as a fighter, thanks to new composite materials, FBW, and its mostly well-designed aerodynamic features. While it will often encounter more advanced fighters like the MiG-29 series and F-16 series, which pose significant threats from longer ranges, the JH-7A excels against adversaries at its tier. Despite its considerable size, it has the ability to stick on the tail of enemy jets, pulling AoA for increased firing opportunities, while having the acceleration recover or disengage when necessary. The PL-5C and PL-8 IR AAMs are both strong missiles. However, only being able to carry two PL-8, it can be recommended to reserve them for engaging longer-range targets, and using the PL-5Cs for most other scenarios. The PL-5B, a rear-aspect missile, can also be effective against careless targets thanks to its impressive thrust and range.

To maximize the JH-7A's capabilities, it is crucial to bear in mind the manoeuvrability limitations inherent in high-wing aircraft. Pilots should exercise caution regarding altitude when engaging both ground and aerial targets, particularly during dogfights, where the JH-7A requires additional altitude for recovery.

The taste of one's own medicine

In combined battles, the JH-7A presents some advantages over alternative options such as the F-16A MLU and Q-5L. It has a vast arsenal of weaponry including up to six player-selected LGBs, scaling from 250 kg, 500 kg and 1 ton-class bombs, along with up to 22 unguided bombs for numerous devastating strikes. Images of recent years from PLA photographer also hinted the possibility to equip Russian Kh-29T AGM which further boost its engagement range; lastly, 90 mm or 130 mm rocket pods remain an option as well.

For Chinese tech-tree players, the JH-7A presents the opportunity to give enemies with more advanced multirole jets a taste of their own medicine. Equipped with the advanced K/ADC03A targeting pod with high-definition and zoom and a 2nd gen TVD for target acquisition, the JH-7A's life is made considerably easier when locating ground targets. Diving for the target and tossing bombs is effective, but for increased safety, pulling up after dropping bombs and flying sideways while maintaining a lock on the target is recommended. Depending on the quantity of enemy vehicles and their location, players can either pick six GB 250 for maximum efficiency, any precise hits within 3 m radius of enemy can terminate their service immediately; while bringing heavier GB 500/1000 will make sure enemies in a certain radius can face their ultimate demise, especially with GB 1000, which can be said as the ultimate solution against the toughest MBTs of its BR. Alternatively, thanks to FCS upgrades, JH-7A can also equip Russian Kh-29T; instead of HEAT warhead, Kh-29T is filled with explosives for maximum efficiency against ground targets, it is more akin to an universal missile against stationary targets and slow-moving vehicles. Make sure to check the weather of the map as TV cameras can be interfered by clouds and smog, as long as enemy targets did not take cover, a precise hit from the high ballistics of this missile can make sure it can neutralize designated targets.

Utilizing unguided bombs from low altitudes also remains a viable strategy; be sure to know where the locations of the enemy's major forces and avoid SPAAs, anti-air capable attack helicopters, and other jets at all costs. CCRP can aid in destroying stationary targets, provided the area is locked before bombs are released. Despite lacking long-range AGMs for the safest approach, the JH-7A can also employ unguided rockets as a little extra firepower against unaware SPAAs or light vehicles when bombs are depleted, supporting friendly jets and helicopters by eliminating potential threats.

The JH-7A can equip its full complement of air-to-air missiles with minimal overlap with bomb and rocket pylons, allowing it to defend against menacing enemy jets. The tactics will be very similar to air battles, while also having to be wary of enemy SPAAs: sneak up on enemies to deliver the fatal blow.

A crucial operational note for the JH-7A is to never even have the potential for close calls when evading terrain. The high-wing design necessitates additional altitude for recovery during ground assaults; it's better to abort the assault sooner rather than later, as a surviving jet can do way more damage than a jet that has slapped itself into the terrain.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Excellent payload with varieties of bombs, AGM and rockets
  • Great self-defense IR AAM options
  • Great acceleration thanks to the FWS-9 turbofan engines
  • Manoeuvrable for such a huge jet
  • Advanced avionics
    • KJ8602 RWR and MAWS for maximum situational awareness
    • Digitalized cockpit with high integration for simulation battles
    • Aerial-combat-capable multifunction Pulse-Doppler radar

Cons:

  • Rather huge target
  • Needs more altitude to recover due to high wing design
  • Long learning curve for the placement of 23 mm autocannon

History

What the Aviation Forces Lack

As Mainland China has already developed domestic attacker, namely the Q-5 series from Nanchang, there were already needs for a land-based naval aircraft for ship attacking operations i.e. Q-5Yi (强-5乙), probably the very last torpedo bomber ever designed. Soon after the Sino-Vietnamese (with RVN) conflicts of 1974, PLAN found a major piece of puzzle lacking for their South China Sea composition: an attacker capable of launching AShM for standoff operations while able to fly supersonic; while PLAAF also called for a new supersonic attacker to replace the H-5 fleet against the menacing Soviet forces. Thus Chinese military commands listed their requirements for the new attacker by 1976 where the CMC called for a new jet for both aviation forces under the same airframe and capable to defend itself from enemy interceptors while maintaining sufficiently high payload; with Chen Yijian 陈一坚 in lead, XAC was approved for the new bomber on October 1977, while the requirements were also given to SAC and NAMC respectively (note from editor: CAC was working on the J-9 program led by Song Wencong 宋文骢, future chief engineer of J-10), leading to a "civil-war" and probably the very first competition of aircrafts between Chinese manufacturers.

The Winner of the trio : JH-7

As the program for new supersonic attacker went on, there were 3 schemes for PLAAF and PLAN command: the first one was the H-7 (轰-7) led by Chen Yijian with the design of JH-7 for the time being (the LRIP series of JH-7 of 1990s); JH-8 (歼轰-8) by SAC led by Gu Songfeng (顾诵芬, chief designer of J-8 series) with the iconic side intake of what-would-become J-8II in 1984 and the ambitious Q-6 (强-6) by Lu Xiaopeng (陆孝鹏, designer of Q-5 and J-12) with side intakes and variable swept wings inspired from the MiG-23MS acquired from Egypt. As for JH-8, the design would decrease its ceiling, radius wasn't considered a good idea for an attacker; while Q-6 was way too ambitious with its powerplant and structure, which were deemed not possible for Mainland China for the era especially during economic reforms where many new technologies have to give the way for the economy. Thus, the design from XAC, H-7, eventually won the competition with lower subsonic drag than the JH-8 design.

Due to the design philosophy differences between PLAAF and PLANAF (Side-by-side vs tandem cockpit), PLAAF eventually quit the H-7 program and PLANAF's scheme won the overall design for the new jet. The new jet would utilize the 50 imported, used RR Spey RB.168 MK.202 from Great Britain as the new powerplant (which was intended for the J-13 program); while a H-5 named "Eagle" (鹰式武器试验机) would test the Type 232H PD radar and the AShM for future aircrafts. By a certain exhibition in 1988, Ministry of Aviation Industry (soon AVIC) exhibited the B-7 prototype to the public at its 1/100th prototype; while its prototypes made it to the skies in 1990s with fatalities during test flight (085 prototype with the pilot duo), the new JH-7 joined PLANAF service by late 1990s during a certain Zhuhai Airshow as the FBC-1 fighter-bomber with only provisions of 18 production aircrafts due to the engine supplies.

The Ultimate Form - JH-7A

As the introduction of Su-30MKK Flanker-H to PLANAF by late 1990s, PLANAF sought for utilizing the JH-7 platform for their latest AShM as well as provisions for BVR capabilities to fulfill the abbreviation "J" (歼, interceptors); as well as the testbed of JL-10A radar as the alternative to CAC's J-10 program (which the Type 1473 was certified). This was also one of the new jets to utilize the PLAAF equivalent of NATO MIL-STD-1553B main data bus, MFDs and HUD; as well as a new FBW control as the backup for J-10, these features eventually become the foundations of the new JH-7A fighter-bomber utilizing CAD design via Dassault CATID V3, new pair of tail fins, as well as removed wing fences. First flown by early 2000s, JH-7A earned both the orders from PLANAF and PLAAF, distinguished by the red numberings (PLANAF) and yellow numbering (PLAAF) thanks to its multirole missions; although incidents have caused lives of PLA pilots through its service up to this date, it has still been a humble yet effective fighter-bomber for the aviation forces of PLA and a delivery platform (under the JH-7AII upgrade) of some latest airborne AShM, AGM or ALCM (air-launched cruise missile) platforms.

Devblog

After several years of development, China finalized the development of its own fighter-bomber, the JH-7, which ticked all of the boxes that were set out by PLA command for an aircraft to replace the outdated Q-5. In 1999, following orders from the Central Military Committee, work began on creating an improved version of the JH-7. This extensive modernization program included 303 changes, which included improving the fire control system with the introduction of a digital electronic sighting system, as well as increasing the range of its suspended weapons. This updated fighter-bomber, now designated JH-7A made its first flight in 2002, and began entering service in October 2004. JH-7A aircraft are still currently serving in the Chinese Air Force.

Media

Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.

See also

Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:

  • reference to the series of the aircraft;
  • links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.

External links


Xi'an Aircraft Industrial Corporation (西安飞机工业集团)
Strike Aircraft  JH-7A

China jet aircraft
Fighters  J-2 · J-4 · Shenyang F-5 · J-6A · J-7II · J-7D · J-7E · J-8B · J-8F · J-11
Strike aircraft  Q-5 early · Q-5A · Q-5L · A-5C · JH-7A
Bombers  H-5
American  ␗F-84G-21-RE · ␗F-84G-31-RE · ␗F-86F-30 · ␗F-86F-40 · ␗F-100A · ␗F-100F · ␗F-104A · ␗F-104G · ␗F-5A · ␗F-5E · ␗F-16A MLU
Soviet  ␗MiG-9 · ␗MiG-9 (l)