Difference between revisions of "USS Litchfield"
(Added tables and basic info.) |
Inceptor57 (talk | contribs) (Pending BR change, Updated template w/ new design) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Relevance}} | ||
{{Specs-Card|code=us_destroyer_clemson_litchfield}} | {{Specs-Card|code=us_destroyer_clemson_litchfield}} | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
<!--[[File:GarageImage_{{PAGENAME}}.jpg|420px|thumb|left]]--> | <!--[[File:GarageImage_{{PAGENAME}}.jpg|420px|thumb|left]]--> | ||
| − | The '''{{specs|name}}''' is a gift Rank {{specs|rank}} American destroyer {{Battle-rating|1}}. | + | The '''{{specs|name}}''' is a gift Rank {{specs|rank}} American destroyer {{Battle-rating|1}}. It was introduced in [[Update 1.79 "Project X"]]. |
== General info == | == General info == | ||
=== Survivability and armour === | === Survivability and armour === | ||
| − | <!--''Talk about the vehicle’s armour. Note the most well-defended and most vulnerable zones, e.g. the ammo magazine. Evaluate the composition of components and assemblies responsible for movement and manoeuvrability. Evaluate the survivability of the primary and secondary armament separately. | + | <!--''Talk about the vehicle’s armour. Note the most well-defended and most vulnerable zones, e.g. the ammo magazine. Evaluate the composition of components and assemblies responsible for movement and manoeuvrability. Evaluate the survivability of the primary and secondary armament separately. Don't forget to mention the size of the crew, which plays an important role in fleet mechanics. Tips for preserving survivability should be saved for the “Use in battle” section. |
If necessary, use a graphic template to show the most well-protected or most vulnerable points in the armor.''--> | If necessary, use a graphic template to show the most well-protected or most vulnerable points in the armor.''--> | ||
'''Armour type:''' | '''Armour type:''' | ||
| Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
| − | |||
=== Mobility === | === Mobility === | ||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
=== Secondary armament === | === Secondary armament === | ||
| − | <!--''Some ships are fitted with weapons of various | + | <!--''Some ships are fitted with weapons of various calibers. Secondary armament is defined by the weapon chosen with the control <code>Select secondary weapon</code>. Evaluate the secondary armament and give advice on how to use them. Describe the ammunition available for the secondary armament. Provide recommendations on how to use them and which ammunition to choose. Remember that anti-air armament, even heavy caliber weapons, belong in the next section.'' |
''If there is no secondary armament, remove this section.''--> | ''If there is no secondary armament, remove this section.''--> | ||
| Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
=== Anti-aircraft armament === | === Anti-aircraft armament === | ||
| − | <!--''An important part of the ship’s armament responsible for air raid | + | <!--''An important part of the ship’s armament responsible for air raid defense. Anti-aircraft armament is defined by the weapon chosen with the control <code>Select anti-aircraft weapons</code>. Talk about the ship’s anti-air cannons and machine guns, the number of guns and their positions, their effective range, and about their overall effectiveness – including against surface targets.'' |
''If there is no anti-aircraft artillery, remove this section.''--> | ''If there is no anti-aircraft artillery, remove this section.''--> | ||
| Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
* ? x Mk.6 mortar depth charge | * ? x Mk.6 mortar depth charge | ||
| − | == Usage in | + | == Usage in battles == |
| − | + | ''Describe the technique of using this ship, the characteristics of her use in a team and tips on strategy. Abstain from writing an entire guide – don’t get try to provide a single point of view, but give the reader food for thought. Talk about the most dangerous opponents for this vehicle and provide recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of playing with this vehicle in various modes (AB, RB, SB).'' | |
| + | === Pros and cons === | ||
| + | ''Summarize and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in the bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - they have a substitution in the form of softer "inadequate", "effective".'' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
'''Pros:''' | '''Pros:''' | ||
* | * | ||
| Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| − | '' | + | ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the ship in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too big, take it to a separate article, taking a link to an article about the vehicle and adding a block "/ History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article.'' |
== Media == | == Media == | ||
| + | ''An excellent addition to the article will be video guides, as well as screenshots from the game and photos.'' | ||
| + | == See also == | ||
| + | ''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:'' | ||
| + | * ''reference to the series of the ship;'' | ||
| + | * ''links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.'' | ||
| − | == | + | == External links == |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
''Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:'' | ''Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:'' | ||
* ''topic on the official game forum;'' | * ''topic on the official game forum;'' | ||
| − | * ''page on ship | + | * ''encyclopedia page on ship;'' |
* ''other literature.'' | * ''other literature.'' | ||
{{USA destroyers}} | {{USA destroyers}} | ||
Revision as of 17:02, 25 February 2019
 | Relevance under question. The content of this article is most likely outdated and is not reflecting the current state of affairs. The article needs to be updated. |
Contents
Description
The Clemson-class, USS Litchfield (DD-336), 1936 is a gift Rank I American destroyer with a battle rating of 3.3 (AB/RB/SB). It was introduced in Update 1.79 "Project X".
General info
Survivability and armour
Armour type:
- Antifragmentation armour
- Cast homogeneous armour
- Hardened armour
| Armour | Bow (Slope angle) | Sides | Stern | Deck |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hull | N/A | ?? mm (0-??°) | N/A | ?? mm (??-??°) |
| Armour | Front | Sides | Rear | Roof |
| Turrets | ?.? mm Front ?? mm Gun mantlet |
?.? mm | ?.? mm | ?.? mm |
Notes:
Mobility
| Mobility characteristic | ||
|---|---|---|
| Weight (tons) | ||
| ?,??? | ||
| Max Speed (km/h) | ||
| Mode | Stock | Upgraded |
| Arcade | ?? | ?? |
| Realistic/Simulator | ?? | ?? |
Armament
Primary armament
| 127 mm 5/38 Mark 12 Dual Purpose gun (x5) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets (Bow to stern) | ||||||
| Turret 1 | Turret 2 | Turret 3 | Turret 4 | Turret 5 | ||
| Vertical guidance | -??°/+??° | -??°/+??° | -??°/+??° | -??°/+??° | -??°/+??° | |
| Horizontal guidance | ±???° | ±???° | ±???° | ±???° | ±???° | |
| Ammo capacity | ?,??? | |||||
| Rounds per turret | ??? | |||||
Ammunition
| Penetration statistics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Penetration in mm @ 90° | |||||
| ?? m | ??? m | ??? m | ?,??? m | ?,??? m | ?,??? m | ||
| ??? mm ACC | HE | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? |
| ??? mm Common | APHE | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? | ??? |
| ??? mm AAVP | HE-VT | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? | ?? |
| Shell details | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Velocity in m/s |
Projectile Mass in kg |
Fuse delay
in m: |
Fuse sensitivity
in mm: |
Explosive Mass in g (TNT equivalent): |
Normalization At 30° from horizontal: |
Ricochet: | ||
| 0% | 50% | 100% | ||||||||
| ??? mm AAC | HE | ??? | ?? | 0.0 | 0.1 | ?,??? | +0° | ??° | ??° | ??° |
| ??? mm Common | APHE | ??? | ?? | ?.0 | ?? | ?,??? | ° | ??° | ??° | ??° |
| ??? mm AAVT | HE-VT | ??? | ?? | 0.0 | 0.1 | ?,??? | +0° | ??° | ??° | ??° |
Secondary armament
| ?? mm Bofors Mk. I (x10) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets (Bow to stern) | ||||||
| Front port turret (x?) | Front starboard turret (x?) | Middle port turret (x?) | Middle starboard turret (x?) | Rear turret (x?) | ||
| Vertical guidance | -??°/+??° | -??°/+??° | -??°/+??° | -??°/+??° | -??°/+??° | |
| Horizontal guidance | -???°/+??° | -??°/+???° | -???°/+??° | -??°/+???° | ±???° | |
| Ammo capacity | ??,000 | |||||
| Rounds per turret | ?,000 | |||||
Belts
| Belts | Shell composition | Combat usage |
| Universal | AP-T – HEF-T | |
| ?? mm HE clips | HEF-T – HEF-T – HEF-T – AP-T | |
| ?? mm AP clips | AP-T – AP-T – AP-T – HEF-T |
Anti-aircraft armament
| ?? mm Oerlikon Mk.II (x?) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets (Bow to stern) | |||||||
| Front port turret | Middle port turret | Front starboard turret | Middle starboard turret | Rear port turret | Rear starboard turret | Rear stern turret | |
| Vertical guidance | -??°/+??° | ±???° | -??°/+??° | ±?00° | ±??0° | ||
| Horizontal guidance | -?°/+??° | ||||||
| Ammo capacity | ??,?00 | ||||||
| Rounds per turret | ?,?00 | ||||||
Torpedo armament
| 533 mm steam turbined Mk.15 torpedo | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # on ship | Mass (kg) | Maximum speed in water (km/h) |
Travel distance (km) | Depth stroke (m) | Arming distance (m) |
Explosive type | Explosive mass (kg) | |
| ?? | ?,??? | ?? | ??.? | 0.? | ?? | TNT | ??? | |
Special armament
- Without load
- ? x Mk.6 mortar depth charge
Usage in battles
Describe the technique of using this ship, the characteristics of her use in a team and tips on strategy. Abstain from writing an entire guide – don’t get try to provide a single point of view, but give the reader food for thought. Talk about the most dangerous opponents for this vehicle and provide recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of playing with this vehicle in various modes (AB, RB, SB).
Pros and cons
Summarize and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in the bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - they have a substitution in the form of softer "inadequate", "effective".
Pros:
Cons:
History
Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the ship in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too big, take it to a separate article, taking a link to an article about the vehicle and adding a block "/ History" (example: https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Vehicle-name)/History) and add a link to it here using the main template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <ref>, as well as adding them at the end of the article.
Media
An excellent addition to the article will be video guides, as well as screenshots from the game and photos.
See also
Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:
- reference to the series of the ship;
- links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.
External links
Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:
- topic on the official game forum;
- encyclopedia page on ship;
- other literature.
| USA destroyers | |
|---|---|
| Clemson-class | USS Welborn C. Wood · USS Barker · USS Litchfield |
| Farragut-class | USS Aylwin |
| Bagley-class | USS Bagley |
| Porter-class | USS Porter · USS Phelps · USS Moffett |
| Somers-class | USS Somers · USS Davis |
| Fletcher-class | USS Fletcher · USS Bennion · USS Cowell |
| Allen M. Sumner-class | USS Sumner |
| Gearing-class | USS Gearing · USS Frank Knox |
| Mitscher-class | USS Mitscher · USS Wilkinson |
