User contributions
(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | older 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 11:00, 9 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (-85) . . m Type 74 (E) (→Pros and cons: this is no longer a thing if i am not mistaken.)
- 10:12, 9 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+302) . . m RakJPz 2 (→Pros and cons: i think atgm cost pro is kind of "duh" moment, so probably worth removing. rearranged the rest of points, as they were all over the place.)
- 09:06, 9 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+2,369) . . Striker (→Pros and cons: tried to rewrite pro/con in more elaborate and competetive way, but mostly i can only give generalized examples, due to lack of other tanks with such properties. I mean, even RPJPZ is not comparable to this outside of speed.)
- 08:22, 8 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+1,294) . . Swingfire (→Pros and cons: rearranged and rewrote to more elaborate sentences)
- 06:46, 8 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+181) . . m Striker (→Main armament: re-added info about secondary camera to this section, as it sounded like only sniper cam can guide things. It might not be as viable in RB, but i can't measure exactly how far it can see. i digress.)
- 14:05, 5 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+467) . . m Type 60 ATM (This edit may seem petty, but it was always technically possible and though only very salty or very knowledgeable people abuse physics engine, i noneless managed to get pancaked during match on urban map. Other tanks usually just topple over (as a pro).)
- 12:20, 2 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+839) . . Merkava Mk.3D (USA) (→Pros and cons: Not sure about whole engine and APFSDS part, but i saw it not explode on direct hit and protection analysis says it can stop them, so i have to trust in that. Someone with practice should be able to tell better.)
- 10:00, 2 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+646) . . m IS-4M (→Pros and cons: elaborated armour a bit more, because it's not really its frontal armour alone, that causes people to religiously hate it, but it's actually the back armour. Also moved weakspot con higher, as its more important.)
- 14:26, 1 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+985) . . IT-1 (→Pros and cons: rewrote it to make more sense along ATGM tank logic and overall power balance. also i doubt the ammo rack can still be detonated, but i dunno, really.)
- 12:29, 1 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+512) . . m Challenger 2 (→Pros and cons: i'm not sure why, but in-game blow out panel is absolutely useless, so having inert ammo or no ammo in turret at all >>>>> blowout panel in my opinion. Feel free to correct me, if that's only a thing in AB and not in RB. idk.)
- 12:00, 1 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+70) . . m Striker (→Ammunition: the default ammo table does not display initial missile speed (important), nor acceleration (also kinda important but not for this tank, maybe). re-added velocity to notes instead)
- 08:17, 1 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (-1) . . m BMP-2M (→Pros and cons: typo. i feel like i wrote this sentence in a bit awkward way, but i can't really tell.)
- 07:36, 1 October 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+551) . . m BMP-2M (→Pros and cons: wrote-up a pair of cons, which seem to be relevant for some people.)
- 09:13, 30 September 2020 (diff | hist) . . (-1) . . m Khrizantema-S (→Survivability and armour: typo)
- 23:38, 29 September 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+4,473) . . Khrizantema-S (anti-air properties. Someone would need to clarify if you can change ATGM types in single reload bundle. probably not possible. tried to fill radar info. i'm done since i dont own it and can't test it any further myself.)
- 16:39, 29 September 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+111) . . m Khrizantema-S (→Pros and cons: rewrote con to sound less engrish.)
- 15:54, 29 September 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+2,097) . . User talk:bangerland (→Copy and pasting from RU)
- 14:26, 29 September 2020 (diff | hist) . . (0) . . m Khrizantema-S (→Survivability and armour: typo in acronym)
- 14:16, 29 September 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+5,685) . . Khrizantema-S (Using various separate data, videos and WortexDaniel's text from .ru wiki to compile something semi-adequately showing the power of this tank. At the very least, fixing existing text is easier than nothing. i digress. Fact/grammar checking is needed,maybe)
- 06:59, 17 September 2020 (diff | hist) . . (+81) . . m Stormer HVM (→Pros and cons: I suppose in my ignorance i counted FAF missiles as radar seeking ones (the UI for them look awfully like locking on, so i guess that's why). These would be found on tiger-something helicopters. (UHT i think?))
(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | older 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
