User contributions
- 00:22, 5 November 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+80) . . F-4EJ Phantom II (Tag: Visual edit)
- 00:16, 5 November 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+14) . . F-4EJ Phantom II (Tag: Visual edit)
- 00:15, 5 November 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+103) . . F-4EJ Phantom II (Tag: Visual edit)
- 00:14, 5 November 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-525) . . F-4EJ Phantom II (article was outdated and just plain wrong on so many fronts. Made the F-4EJ out to be a much better-maneuvering plane than it really is. Many references to "leading edge flaps" even though it has no Agile Eagle and no combat flaps.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 21:21, 13 October 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-3) . . F4U-7 (→Flight performance: The F4U-7 got an engine rework and received 145 octane fuel and a 70"Hg engine setting. The top speed increased and the critical altitude decreased.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 21:18, 13 October 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-4) . . F4U-4B VMF-214 (→Flight performance: The F4U-4B got a massive engine rework. It is much faster at altitude now.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 21:17, 13 October 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-4) . . F4U-4B (→General info: The F4U-4B (alongside the -7) got a massive engine rework. It received a 2-stage 3-speed supercharger and is much faster at altitude now.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 21:09, 9 October 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+9) . . J6K1 (It has a 2-stage 3-speed supercharger) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 19:03, 30 July 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+27) . . Spitfire LF Mk IX (I removed the part about having high wingloading. The Spitfire LF 9 does not have high wingloading. In fact it has very LOW wingloading compared to most of the other planes at its BR. That is why it turns so well.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 07:07, 12 April 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-41) . . B7A2 (→Description: It's sustained turn is not exceptional, and its overall maneuverability is nowhere near as good as a Zero. It is good, but nowhere near a Zero.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 07:06, 12 April 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+68) . . B7A2 (→Pros and cons) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 07:27, 27 March 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-9) . . F-100D (→Flight performance: The Mig-19 is not faster at sea level. It is actually a few kph slower. It simply accelerates better, but the Mig-19PT can only reach 1205kph at sea level in clean configuration, while the F-100D reaches 1215kph clean.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 22:58, 2 March 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-29) . . Ki-44-II otsu (It definitely doesn't have the highest top speed of its rank. It is among the fastest but there are still planes that are faster. Examples: F4U-1A, F4U-1A (USMC), P-39N-0, P-38E and G (at altitude), XP-55, FW 190 A-1, Typhoon Mk Ia, Corsair MK II) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 04:40, 31 October 2022 (diff | hist) . . (-36) . . Mystere IVA (It is not at all slow compared to its peers. Its straight line top speed is among the highest at 8.7. It is faster than Sabres and Mig-15bis and Mig-17. It's just that its acceleration isn't the greatest.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 02:54, 28 October 2022 (diff | hist) . . (-219) . . F4U-1A (USMC) (The engine is no different from that of the F4U-1a.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 04:52, 29 January 2022 (diff | hist) . . (-4) . . m P-51C-10 (Laminar flow wings do not affect maneuverability. That seems to be a very widespread myth. All laminar flow wings do is delay the turbulent boundary layer from forming which decreases drag. The P-51's great high-speed control is due to control surfaces.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 19:47, 29 March 2019 (diff | hist) . . (-34) . . Do 335 A-0 (Its top speed at sea level is above average, not sub-par. It's about as fast as a FW 190 D-9 or P-51D-30.) (Tag: Visual edit)
- 19:45, 29 March 2019 (diff | hist) . . (-28) . . Do 335 A-1 (The top speed at sea level is definitely not sub-par. It is actually above-average. It's about as fast as a FW 190 D-9 or P-51D-30.) (Tag: Visual edit)
