Related changes
This is a list of changes made recently to pages linked from a specified page (or to members of a specified category). Pages on your watchlist are bold.
4 November 2024
3 November 2024
| 21:13 | (Revision approval log) . . [Colok76286 (2×)] | ||
| 21:13 . . Colok76286 (talk | contribs) set 194450 as the approved revision for "AS-20 Nord" | |||
| 18:58 . . Colok76286 (talk | contribs) set 194445 as the approved revision for "R-13M1" |
| 21:13 | AS-20 Nord (diff | hist) . . (+5) . . Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (Edits) |
| 18:14 | F-8E (2 changes | history) . . (-458) . . [max1me (2×)] | ||
| 18:14 (cur | prev) . . (-303) . . max1me (talk | contribs) (→General info: Updated Flight performance: removing any indication on wing rip and advised newer pilots to not use landing flaps in combat.) (Tag: Visual edit) | |||
| 17:53 (cur | prev) . . (-155) . . max1me (talk | contribs) (Overhaul of the Pros and Cons page with updated information, as the latest updates have negated the F-8E's wing rip issue + cleanup of information) (Tag: Visual edit) |
| 18:09 | R-13M1 (diff | hist) . . (-31) . . WARTURTLE09 (talk | contribs) (→Pros and cons: R13M1 does NOT have 24km of practical range. I dont even know how this even got aprrovd) (Tag: Visual edit) |
| m 17:58 | F8U-2 (diff | hist) . . (-63) . . max1me (talk | contribs) (→Pros and cons: Removed con that F8U-2 as fragile wings, as the wing rip has been considerably buffed (happens very very rarely and in specific situations).) (Tag: Visual edit) |
