Difference between revisions of "USS Portland"
(→Pros and cons) (Tag: Visual edit) |
(→Pros and cons: Edits) |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
=== Pros and cons === | === Pros and cons === | ||
− | '' | + | <!-- ''Summarise and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in the bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - use substitutions with softer forms such as "inadequate" and "effective".'' --> |
'''Pros:''' | '''Pros:''' | ||
− | * Improved | + | * Improved armour protection from HE shrapnel compared to the Brooklyn |
− | * Reasonably modern AA | + | * Reasonably modern AA defences |
− | * Thicker | + | * Thicker armour over main magazines than the Brooklyn |
* Crew of 848 is above average | * Crew of 848 is above average | ||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Cons:''' | '''Cons:''' | ||
− | * Long reload compared to most of its competition with minimum reload at 17. | + | * Long reload compared to most of its competition with minimum reload at 17.1 s |
− | * Poor shell selection with primarily inter-war shells | + | * Poor shell selection with primarily inter-war shells |
* No torpedo armament | * No torpedo armament | ||
− | |||
− | |||
== History == | == History == |
Revision as of 21:59, 3 September 2020
Contents
Description
The Portland-class, USS Portland (CA-33), 1942 is a rank IV American heavy cruiser
with a battle rating of 5.3 (AB/RB/SB). It was introduced in Update 1.97 "Viking Fury".
General info
Survivability and armour
Talk about the vehicle's armour. Note the most well-defended and most vulnerable zones, e.g. the ammo magazine. Evaluate the composition of components and assemblies responsible for movement and manoeuvrability. Evaluate the survivability of the primary and secondary armaments separately. Don't forget to mention the size of the crew, which plays an important role in fleet mechanics. Save tips on preserving survivability for the "Usage in battles" section. If necessary, use a graphical template to show the most well-protected or most vulnerable points in the armour.
Mobility
Write about the ship's mobility. Evaluate its power and manoeuvrability, rudder rerouting speed, stopping speed at full tilt, with its maximum forward and reverse speed.
Armament
Primary armament
Provide information about the characteristics of the primary armament. Evaluate their efficacy in battle based on their reload speed, ballistics and the capacity of their shells. Add a link to the main article about the weapon: {main|Weapon name (calibre)}
. Broadly describe the ammunition available for the primary armament, and provide recommendations on how to use it and which ammunition to choose.
Secondary armament
Some ships are fitted with weapons of various calibres. Secondary armaments are defined as weapons chosen with the control Select secondary weapon
. Evaluate the secondary armaments and give advice on how to use them. Describe the ammunition available for the secondary armament. Provide recommendations on how to use them and which ammunition to choose. Remember that any anti-air armament, even heavy calibre weapons, belong in the next section. If there is no secondary armament, remove this section.
Anti-aircraft armament
An important part of the ship's armament responsible for air defence. Anti-aircraft armament is defined by the weapon chosen with the control Select anti-aircraft weapons
. Talk about the ship's anti-air cannons and machine guns, the number of guns and their positions, their effective range, and about their overall effectiveness – including against surface targets. If there are no anti-aircraft armaments, remove this section.
Torpedo armament
Torpedoes launchers are standard equipment on many ships and boats. Torpedoes are a significant means of defeating an opponent. Evaluate the position of the torpedo launchers, discuss the ammunition available, firing specifics such as dead zones, features of the torpedoes themselves, etc. If there is no torpedo armament, remove this section.
Special armament
Depth charges, mines, rocket launchers and missiles are also effective in skilled hands and can take an off-guard opponent by surprise. Evaluate the ammunition of this type of armament and rate its performance in combat. If there are no special armaments, remove this section.
Usage in battles
Describe the technique of using this ship, the characteristics of her use in a team and tips on strategy. Abstain from writing an entire guide – don't try to provide a single point of view, but give the reader food for thought. Talk about the most dangerous opponents for this vehicle and provide recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of playing with this vehicle in various modes (AB, RB, SB).
Modules
Tier | Seakeeping | Unsinkability | Firepower | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | Dry-Docking | Tool Set | 8 inch Mk.19 APCBC | Anti-Air Armament Targeting | ||
II | Rudder Replacement | Fire Protection System | Smokescreen | 8 inch Mk.25 HC | Auxiliary Armament Targeting | |
III | Propeller Replacement | Shrapnel Protection | Ventilation | 5 inch Mk.28 AAC-VT | Primary Armament Targeting | Improved Rangefinder |
IV | Engine Maintenance | New Pumps | Ammo Wetting | 8 inch Mk.17 SP Common |
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Improved armour protection from HE shrapnel compared to the Brooklyn
- Reasonably modern AA defences
- Thicker armour over main magazines than the Brooklyn
- Crew of 848 is above average
Cons:
- Long reload compared to most of its competition with minimum reload at 17.1 s
- Poor shell selection with primarily inter-war shells
- No torpedo armament
History
The Portland Class cruisers were the third heavy cruiser design that the Americans produced in the interwar years, following the Northampton class. There were only two ships in this class, the USS Portland CA-33 and the USS Indianapolis CA-35. Interestingly the Portland Class was originally planned to be a light cruiser design, being re-designated as heavy cruisers only after the hulls had been laid down in 1931.
Ships of the class were propelled by 4 screws, powered at 107,000 horsepower. This gave the ship a fairly standard top speed of 32 knots and a cruising range of 10,000 nautical miles.
Firepower was provided from 3 triple 8" guns in Mk. 14 turrets. This design was carried over from the previous Northampton Class. These 280 ton turrets allowed a maximum of 41 degrees of elevation and 5 degrees of depression. The turrets were used in conjunction with the Mk.34 fire director system by, at the latest, 1945.
Media
Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.
See also
Links to articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:
- reference to the series of the ship;
- links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.
External links
Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:
- topic on the official game forum;
- encyclopedia page on the ship;
- other literature.
USA heavy cruisers | |
---|---|
Pensacola-class | USS Pensacola |
Northampton-class | USS Northampton |
Portland-class | USS Portland |
New Orleans-class | USS New Orleans |
Baltimore-class | USS Baltimore · USS Pittsburgh |
Des Moines-class | USS Des Moines · USS Newport News |