Type 3 depth charge
Contents
Description
Write an introduction to the article in 2-3 small paragraphs. Briefly tell us about the history of the development and combat using the weaponry and also about its features. Compile a list of air, ground, or naval vehicles that feature this weapon system in the game.
Vehicles equipped with this weapon
General info
Tell us about the tactical and technical characteristics of the depth charge.
Effective damage
Describe the type of damage produced by this type of depth charge (high explosive, splash damage, etc)
Comparison with analogues
Give a comparative description of depth charges that have firepower equal to this weapon.
Name | Country of origin |
Mass (kg) | Explosive type |
Explosive mass (kg) |
TNT equivalent (kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.2 in T37 | 29 | Torpex | 15.9 | 25.44 | |
B TG | 63 | TNT | 50 | 50 | |
B TG 100 | 126 | TNT | 100 | 100 | |
BAS | 160 | Torpex | 70 | 112 | |
BB-1 | 165 | TNT | 130 | 130 | |
BM-1 | 45 | TNT | 25 | 25 | |
Guiraud | 176 | TNT | 130 | 130 | |
K-gun Mk.9 | 190 | TNT | 136 | 136 | |
Limbo mortar | 177 | Minol | 94 | 108.1 | |
Mk.10 Hedgehog mortar | 29 | Torpex | 15.9 | 25.44 | |
Mk.4 | 160 | Minol | 94 | 108.1 | |
Mk.6 | 190 | TNT | 136 | 136 | |
Mk.6 mortar | 190 | TNT | 136 | 136 | |
Mk.9 | 190 | TNT | 136 | 136 | |
Mk.VII | 196 | TNT | 130 | 130 | |
RBM mortar | 160 | Amatol | 70.8 | 70.8 | |
Type 3 | 50 | Type 88 | 20 | 26 | |
Type 95 | 160 | Amatol | 100 | 100 | |
WBD | 196 | Amatol | 130 | 130 | |
WBF | 139 | Amatol | 60 | 60 | |
WBG | 160 | Amatol | 100 | 100 | |
Y-gun Mk.VII | 196 | TNT | 130 | 130 |
Usage in battles
Describe situations when you would utilise this depth charge in-game (vehicle, pillbox, base, etc)
Pros and cons
Summarise and briefly evaluate the weaponry in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark pros and cons as a list.
Pros:
Cons:
History
The Imperial Japanese Navy never put much effort into protecting their merchant ships from submarines prior to World War II. This is due to the IJN view of submarines in their doctrine, not as commerce raider but intended for direct combat. As a result, their first-line destroyers at the start of World War II weren't armed with depth charges at all[1]. The Type 3 depth charge was introduced during the war to solve this issue.
Like other areas where Japan was deficient during this period, the design was copied from a foreign source. British depth charges were used as the basis for the Type 3 depth charge, which is also called the Type 2 due to being designed in 1942 but entered service in 1943[1]. Originally using 230 pounds of Type 97 explosives (70% TNA/30% HNDA) and depth settings of 98, 197, 295, 394, or 476 feet, but later had 357 pounds of explosives[2]. However, the IJN didn’t often use deeper settings. The Type 3 and similar depth charge designs were used on destroyers, but it was also used on dedicated escort ships that could carry up to 120 depth charges[2].
Media
Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.
See also
- Type 95 depth charge - other Japanese depth charge
External links
References
- Citations
Naval depth charges | |
---|---|
USA | Mk.6 · Mk.6 mortar · K-gun Mk.9 |
Germany | WBD · WBF · WBG |
Foreign: | BB-1 (USSR) · Mk.6 (USA) · Type 95 (Japan) |
USSR | BB-1 · BM-1 · MBU-600 mortar · RBM mortar |
Britain | Limbo mortar · Mk.10 Hedgehog mortar · Mk.VII · Y-gun Mk.VII |
Foreign: | Mk.6 mortar (USA) |
Japan | Type 3 · Type 95 |
Foreign: | Mk.6 mortar (USA) · Mk.9 (USA) · Mk.10 Hedgehog (Britain) |
Italy | B TG · B TG 100 · BAS · Mk.4 |
Foreign: | WBG (Germany) · Mk.10 Hedgehog (Britain) |
France | Guiraud |
Foreign: | Mk.VII (Britain) · Y-gun Mk.VII (Britain) |