Type 3 depth charge

From War Thunder Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Type 3 depth charge dropped off the stern of the Ha-Go (mod. 1).

Description

Write an introduction to the article in 2-3 small paragraphs. Briefly tell us about the history of the development and combat using the weaponry and also about its features. Compile a list of air, ground, or naval vehicles that feature this weapon system in the game.

Vehicles equipped with this weapon

General info

Tell us about the tactical and technical characteristics of the depth charge.

Effective damage

Describe the type of damage produced by this type of depth charge (high explosive, splash damage, etc)

Comparison with analogues

Give a comparative description of depth charges that have firepower equal to this weapon.

Name Country
of origin
Mass (kg) Explosive
type
Explosive mass
(kg)
TNT equivalent
(kg)
7.2 in T37 USA flag.png 29 Torpex 15.9 25.44
B TG Italy flag.png 63 TNT 50 50
B TG 100 Italy flag.png 126 TNT 100 100
BAS Italy flag.png 160 Torpex 70 112
BB-1 USSR flag.png 165 TNT 130 130
BM-1 USSR flag.png 45 TNT 25 25
Guiraud France flag.png 176 TNT 130 130
K-gun Mk.9 USA flag.png 190 TNT 136 136
Limbo mortar Britain flag.png 177 Minol 94 108.1
Mk.10 Hedgehog mortar Britain flag.png 29 Torpex 15.9 25.44
Mk.4 USA flag.png 160 Minol 94 108.1
Mk.6 USA flag.png 190 TNT 136 136
Mk.6 mortar USA flag.png 190 TNT 136 136
Mk.9 USA flag.png 190 TNT 136 136
Mk.VII Britain flag.png 196 TNT 130 130
RBM mortar USSR flag.png 160 Amatol 70.8 70.8
Type 3 Japan flag.png 50 Type 88 20 26
Type 95 Japan flag.png 160 Amatol 100 100
WBD Germany flag.png 196 Amatol 130 130
WBF Germany flag.png 139 Amatol 60 60
WBG Germany flag.png 160 Amatol 100 100
Y-gun Mk.VII Britain flag.png 196 TNT 130 130

Usage in battles

Describe situations when you would utilise this depth charge in-game (vehicle, pillbox, base, etc)

Pros and cons

Summarise and briefly evaluate the weaponry in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark pros and cons as a list.

Pros:

Cons:

History

The Imperial Japanese Navy never put much effort into protecting their merchant ships from submarines prior to World War II. This is due to the IJN view of submarines in their doctrine, not as commerce raider but intended for direct combat. As a result, their first-line destroyers at the start of World War II weren't armed with depth charges at all[1]. The Type 3 depth charge was introduced during the war to solve this issue.

Like other areas where Japan was deficient during this period, the design was copied from a foreign source. British depth charges were used as the basis for the Type 3 depth charge, which is also called the Type 2 due to being designed in 1942 but entered service in 1943[1]. Originally using 230 pounds of Type 97 explosives (70% TNA/30% HNDA) and depth settings of 98, 197, 295, 394, or 476 feet, but later had 357 pounds of explosives[2]. However, the IJN didn’t often use deeper settings. The Type 3 and similar depth charge designs were used on destroyers, but it was also used on dedicated escort ships that could carry up to 120 depth charges[2].

Media

Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.

See also

External links

References

Citations


Naval depth charges
USA  Mk.6 · Mk.6 mortar · K-gun Mk.9
Germany  WBD · WBF · WBG
Foreign:  BB-1 (USSR) · Mk.6 (USA) · Type 95 (Japan)
USSR  BB-1 · BM-1 · MBU-600 mortar · RBM mortar
Britain  Limbo mortar · Mk.10 Hedgehog mortar · Mk.VII · Y-gun Mk.VII
Foreign:  Mk.6 mortar (USA)
Japan  Type 3 · Type 95
Foreign:  Mk.6 mortar (USA) · Mk.9 (USA) · Mk.10 Hedgehog (Britain)
Italy  B TG · B TG 100 · BAS · Mk.4
Foreign:  WBG (Germany) · Mk.10 Hedgehog (Britain)
France  Guiraud
Foreign:  Mk.VII (Britain) · Y-gun Mk.VII (Britain)