Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tiger II (H)"
Heavy_Tanker (talk | contribs) (→Arcade 7.0, discovered 10-03-2021: new section) |
Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (Edits) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The text should be incorrect by now, because the ''“in-game description”'' does not exist anymore and it is historically wrong in some parts. | The text should be incorrect by now, because the ''“in-game description”'' does not exist anymore and it is historically wrong in some parts. | ||
Can it be deleted or reformed? --[[User:U46759123|U46759123]] ([[User talk:U46759123|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC) | Can it be deleted or reformed? --[[User:U46759123|U46759123]] ([[User talk:U46759123|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | : Hello. We are keeping it as an archive of the content that use to be part of the game; so it is not to be edited or deleted. The team can certainly look into its relevancy, however, to see if its future inclusion is necessary.--[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC) | + | : Hello. We are keeping it as an archive of the content that use to be part of the game; so it is not to be edited or deleted. The team can certainly look into its relevancy, however, to see if its future inclusion is necessary. --[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC) |
| − | == | + | == BR 7.0 Arcade == |
| − | So today I discovered that Tiger II H is at 7.0 in Arcade, but 6.7 in RB and SB, how in the world does that make sense? Why use Tiger II H, when I can use Tiger II 10.5 instead? ( | + | So today I discovered that the Tiger II (H) is at 7.0 in Arcade, but 6.7 in RB and SB, how in the world does that make sense? Why use the Tiger II (H), when I can use the Tiger II (10.5 cm Kw.K) instead? (yes, I managed to get it back then). I hope it's a bug, otherwise it's a bit stupid decision on Gaijin's side, the Tiger II (H) has already problems at penetrating tanks at 6.7, but 7.0 is bit of a nerf. As I said, I hope it's a mistake.--[[User:U30344518|U30344518]] ([[User talk:U30344518|talk]]) 00:14, 03 October 2021 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | :The battle ratings were indeed changed in the last changelog for the Tiger II (H). It can take a few days for the BR changes to be updated in the wiki database. The forum is the place to give feedback about BR changes however, not the wiki. --[[User:U44629479|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479|talk]]) 08:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:10, 3 October 2021
History
In-game description
The text should be incorrect by now, because the “in-game description” does not exist anymore and it is historically wrong in some parts. Can it be deleted or reformed? --Leopard408@psn (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. We are keeping it as an archive of the content that use to be part of the game; so it is not to be edited or deleted. The team can certainly look into its relevancy, however, to see if its future inclusion is necessary. --Inceptor57 (talk) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
BR 7.0 Arcade
So today I discovered that the Tiger II (H) is at 7.0 in Arcade, but 6.7 in RB and SB, how in the world does that make sense? Why use the Tiger II (H), when I can use the Tiger II (10.5 cm Kw.K) instead? (yes, I managed to get it back then). I hope it's a bug, otherwise it's a bit stupid decision on Gaijin's side, the Tiger II (H) has already problems at penetrating tanks at 6.7, but 7.0 is bit of a nerf. As I said, I hope it's a mistake.--Heavy_Tanker (talk) 00:14, 03 October 2021 (UTC)
- The battle ratings were indeed changed in the last changelog for the Tiger II (H). It can take a few days for the BR changes to be updated in the wiki database. The forum is the place to give feedback about BR changes however, not the wiki. --Colok76286 (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
