Related changes
← Su-25T
This is a list of changes made recently to pages linked from a specified page (or to members of a specified category). Pages on your watchlist are bold.
4 November 2024
20:21 | MiG-21bis (4 changes | history) . . (0) . . [SerRudolf; kaidestructor (3×)] | ||
20:21 (cur | prev) . . (-1,202) . . SerRudolf (talk | contribs) (Mig 21 has horrible energy retention.) (Tag: Visual edit) | |||
m | 12:48 (cur | prev) . . (0) . . kaidestructor (talk | contribs) (Error in "the") (Tag: Visual edit) | ||
12:36 (cur | prev) . . (+719) . . kaidestructor (talk | contribs) (Added F-5E as Enemy to beware of) (Tag: Visual edit) | |||
12:26 (cur | prev) . . (+483) . . kaidestructor (talk | contribs) (General misinformation about the F-4E, Mig-21 Bis radar usage and added some recomendations about loadouts) (Tag: Visual edit) |
14:33 | S-8KO (diff | hist) . . (+162) . . _max20091_ (talk | contribs) (Add some rocket hidden stats, and cons when using the rocket on helis.) |
3 November 2024
18:05 | MiG-21bis (2 changes | history) . . (-5) . . [M22_Locust_guy; Hakoswede_Razor] | ||
m | 18:05 (cur | prev) . . (0) . . M22_Locust_guy (talk | contribs) (a mistake in the pros and cons, the plane has bad energy retention) (Tag: Visual edit) | ||
16:27 (cur | prev) . . (-5) . . Hakoswede_Razor (talk | contribs) (POOR ENERGY RETENTION (THE MIG-21BIS DOESN'T HAVE "EXCELLENT ENERGY RETENTION")) (Tag: Visual edit) |
2 November 2024
21:43 | Su-27SM (diff | hist) . . (+2) . . Smoki128 (talk | contribs) (→Engine performance) (Tag: Visual edit) |
31 October 2024
01:25 | (Revision approval log) . . Colok76286 (talk | contribs) set 194315 as the approved revision for "R-73" |
30 October 2024
m 22:42 | R-73 (3 changes | history) . . (+4) . . [Nefarioulyte (3×)] | ||
m | 22:42 (cur | prev) . . (+1) . . Nefarioulyte (talk | contribs) (Excuse edit spam, i fixed all instances of "ECCM" and corrected them to "IRCCM") (Tag: Visual edit) | ||
m | 22:41 (cur | prev) . . (+1) . . Nefarioulyte (talk | contribs) (→Pros and cons: Just as with the previous table edit, the "Pros and cons" section said the missile has ECCM, even though it is IRCCM. i fixed.) (Tag: Visual edit) | ||
m | 22:40 (cur | prev) . . (+2) . . Nefarioulyte (talk | contribs) (→Comparison with analogues: I've corrected the "Missile Characteristics" table, in the previous version it used to say "ECCM" and "ECCM Type", but obviously infrared missiles do not work on the EM spectrum so i've fixed it.) (Tag: Visual edit) |
19:37 | (Revision approval log) . . DnaGonite (talk | contribs) set 194264 as the approved revision for "Su-39" |
05:05 | Su-25K (3 changes | history) . . (+82) . . [Josetb79 (3×)] | ||
05:05 (cur | prev) . . (+12) . . Josetb79 (talk | contribs) (→History) (Tag: Visual edit) | |||
m | 04:58 (cur | prev) . . (0) . . Josetb79 (talk | contribs) (→History) (Tag: Visual edit) | ||
m | 04:58 (cur | prev) . . (+70) . . Josetb79 (talk | contribs) (→History) (Tag: Visual edit) |
29 October 2024
15:38 | Su-39 (3 changes | history) . . (0) . . [Colok76286; LittleMordor (2×)] | ||
15:38 (cur | prev) . . (+4) . . Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (Edits) | |||
14:55 (cur | prev) . . (0) . . LittleMordor (talk | contribs) (→Suspended armament) (Tag: Visual edit) | |||
14:54 (cur | prev) . . (-4) . . LittleMordor (talk | contribs) (→Suspended armament) (Tag: Visual edit) |