Difference between revisions of "RN Conte di Cavour"
(→Survivability and armour) |
Jareel_Skaj (talk | contribs) (Added →Pros and cons) |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
=== Pros and cons === | === Pros and cons === | ||
<!-- ''Summarise and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in the bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - use substitutions with softer forms such as "inadequate" and "effective".'' --> | <!-- ''Summarise and briefly evaluate the vehicle in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark its pros and cons in the bulleted list. Try not to use more than 6 points for each of the characteristics. Avoid using categorical definitions such as "bad", "good" and the like - use substitutions with softer forms such as "inadequate" and "effective".'' --> | ||
− | |||
'''Pros:''' | '''Pros:''' | ||
− | * | + | * Above-average penetration of the 320 mm {{Annotation|AP|Armour-piercing}} shells and very good penetration of the {{Annotation|SAP|Semi-armour-piercing}} shells compared to foreign equivalents |
+ | * Very good anti-aircraft capability, limited only by the lack of {{Annotation|HE-VT|High-explosive variable time fuse}} | ||
+ | * Good secondary guns | ||
+ | * Above-average mobility | ||
+ | * Above-average torpedo protection | ||
'''Cons:''' | '''Cons:''' | ||
− | * | + | * Overweight design causes the best citadel armour to be submerged below sea level, making the vessel prone to plunging fire (particularly the magazines) |
+ | * Very low damage output of the primary guns. Both SAP and AP shells offer lower average damage per minute than any contemporary vessel using equivalent shells in this BR | ||
+ | * No HE shells for the primary guns | ||
+ | * Significant crew count in exposed positions, making it prone to substantial crew losses from HE spam | ||
+ | |||
== History == | == History == |
Latest revision as of 20:58, 20 November 2024
Contents
Description
The RN Conte di Cavour, lead ship of the Conte di Cavour-class battleships, was laid down on 10 August 1910, launched on 10 August 1911, and completed and delivered to the Regia Marina on 1 April 1915. On 24 May 1915, she became the flagship of Vice-Admiral Luigi Amedeo di Savoia-Aosta. During WWI, she did not participate in active missions, due to the passive policy adopted by the Italian and Austrian navies, spending 966 hours in exercises and only 40 hours in three bloodless war actions. From 1933 to 1937, she was modernised by the CRDA shipyards in Trieste, retaining only 40% of the original construction; in particular, the amidships turret was removed, while the remaining 305 mm cannons were increased to 320 mm. Additionally, engine power was increased to 93,000 hp.
She re-entered service on 1 June 1937 and was deployed to Taranto where she was at the outbreak of WW2. On 9 July 1940, she took part in the Battle of Punta Stilo, the first battleship engagement between the Regia Marina and the British Mediterranean Fleet. She was partially sunk by a torpedo dropped from a British torpedo bomber during the attack on the naval base of Taranto on the night of 11-12 November 1940. The salvage work lasted until the end of 1941 when she was towed to Trieste for restoration work, but she never returned to service and on 8 September 1943 was abandoned in the port of Trieste. On 10 September 1943, she was captured by the Germans but was abandoned by them and sunk during the bombardment of Trieste on 15 February 1945 by the Allies. She was finally struck off the state naval register on 27 February 1947.
Introduced in Update "Kings of Battle" in her uncompleted 1943-1944 refit, the main armament of Conte di Cavour-class, RN Conte di Cavour, project is quite good, able to inflict damage effectively with her SAP shells. When using the AP, remember to target weak points to maximize damage. The secondary armament is also not bad, as the 135 mm cannons can damage battleships and cruisers, and can be effective in sinking destroyers. The anti-aircraft armament consists of 65 mm and 20 mm cannons, perfect for medium and long range targets. Conte di Cavour's survivability and manoeuvrability are both good, for a battleship of her size.
General info
Survivability and armour
Conte di Cavour has a distributed armour scheme, where the maximum armour thickness is unimpressive but there is armour protecting the entire length of the ship. This distributed armour is quite effective against cruiser-calibre fire, though there are significantly more factors to take into account when fighting other capital ships.
Conte di Cavour's belt armour has a maximal thickness of 250 mm, though this thickness is unfortunately found under the waterline and thus can only protect against underwater shots. Moreover, the 250 mm belt does not extend far enough to cover any of the bow-most ammunition magazines; the belt tapers to 80 mm at the stern and 100 mm in the bow, connecting to a 30 mm icebreaker. Above the lowest strip of belt armour, a 220 mm layer situated at the waterline protects the midship, including the barbette areas, then tapers down to the same armour values as the lower belt. Moving up to the deck, the upper belt decreases to 130 mm, then finally a 110 mm layer of armour. All of this armour is effective against cruisers, but is not immediately capable of stopping battleship-calibre rounds.
While the belt armour is mediocre compared to other battleships, Cavour does have good internal armour which increases her survivability. Cavour has a 45 mm turtleback armour layer protecting the entire citadel, including the engines and main gun magazines. Directly above the turtleback, there is also a flat 72 mm strip that further protects the midship from gunfire. Cavour's internal armour allows her to take a beating from her contemporaries (though this should not be mistaken for invincibility, particularly when facing 15-inch (381 mm) and 16-inch (406 mm) guns).
Cavour has a relatively thin 130 mm layer of armour protecting the fore and aft transverse bulkheads. That being said, when the Cavour is angled, the transverse bulkhead armour can stop some shells in conjunction with the icebreaker and stern armour.
While Cavour lacks innate torpedo protection (which would be listed on the stat card), Cavour includes the infamous Pugliese torpedo defence system, modelled as internal fuel tanks in War Thunder. These fuel tanks offer some protection against torpedoes, though repeated impacts or high-powered torpedoes like the Japanese Type 93 will penetrate the Cavour's defence.
The vertical protection of the Cavour is good, with deck armour of above 40 mm and a second, lower deck layer of 80 and 100 mm armour above the engines and main gun magazines, respectively. Cavour's vertical armour is thus generally effective against aerial attacks, though powerful bombs can still punch through her deck armour.
Mobility
Write about the ship's mobility. Evaluate its power and manoeuvrability, rudder rerouting speed, stopping speed at full tilt, with its maximum forward and reverse speed.
Mobility Characteristics | |||
---|---|---|---|
Game Mode | Upgrade Status | Maximum Speed (km/h) | |
Forward | Reverse | ||
AB | |||
Upgraded | 60 | 29 | |
RB/SB | |||
Upgraded | 52 | 25 |
Modifications and economy
Armament
Primary armament
Provide information about the characteristics of the primary armament. Evaluate their efficacy in battle based on their reload speed, ballistics and the capacity of their shells. Add a link to the main article about the weapon: {{main|Weapon name (calibre)}}
. Broadly describe the ammunition available for the primary armament, and provide recommendations on how to use it and which ammunition to choose.
Penetration statistics | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm) | |||||
1,000 m | 2,500 m | 5,000 m | 7,500 m | 10,000 m | 15,000 m | ||
Granata Perforante | SAP | 427 | 386 | 327 | 279 | 241 | 189 |
APHEBC Palla | APCBC | 678 | 619 | 533 | 462 | 403 | 322 |
Shell details | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Fuse delay (s) |
Fuse sensitivity (mm) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (kg) |
Ricochet | |||||
0% | 50% | 100% | ||||||||||
Granata Perforante | SAP | 830 | 475 | 0.03 | 17 | 23.4 | 47° | 60° | 65° | |||
APHEBC Palla | APCBC | 830 | 525 | 0.03 | 17 | 6.38 | 48° | 63° | 71° |
Secondary armament
Some ships are fitted with weapons of various calibres. Secondary armaments are defined as weapons chosen with the control Select secondary weapon
. Evaluate the secondary armaments and give advice on how to use them. Describe the ammunition available for the secondary armament. Provide recommendations on how to use them and which ammunition to choose. Remember that any anti-air armament, even heavy calibre weapons, belong in the next section. If there is no secondary armament, remove this section.
Penetration statistics | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm) | |||||
1,000 m | 2,500 m | 5,000 m | 7,500 m | 10,000 m | 15,000 m | ||
HE Dirompente | HE | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
APHEBC Perforante | APHEBC | 171 | 139 | 100 | 73 | 56 | 45 |
HE-TF Contro-aerea | HE-TF | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
Shell details | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Fuse delay (s) |
Fuse sensitivity (mm) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (kg) |
Ricochet | |||||
0% | 50% | 100% | ||||||||||
HE Dirompente | HE | 825 | 32.42 | 0 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 79° | 80° | 81° | |||
APHEBC Perforante | APHEBC | 825 | 32.73 | 0.01 | 6 | 1.47 | 48° | 63° | 71° | |||
HE-TF Contro-aerea | HE-TF | 825 | 32.42 | 0 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 79° | 80° | 81° |
Anti-aircraft armament
An important part of the ship's armament responsible for air defence. Anti-aircraft armament is defined by the weapon chosen with the control Select anti-aircraft weapons
. Talk about the ship's anti-air cannons and machine guns, the number of guns and their positions, their effective range, and about their overall effectiveness – including against surface targets. If there are no anti-aircraft armaments, remove this section.
Usage in battles
Describe the technique of using this ship, the characteristics of her use in a team and tips on strategy. Abstain from writing an entire guide – don't try to provide a single point of view, but give the reader food for thought. Talk about the most dangerous opponents for this vehicle and provide recommendations on fighting them. If necessary, note the specifics of playing with this vehicle in various modes (AB, RB, SB).
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Above-average penetration of the 320 mm AP shells and very good penetration of the SAP shells compared to foreign equivalents
- Very good anti-aircraft capability, limited only by the lack of HE-VT
- Good secondary guns
- Above-average mobility
- Above-average torpedo protection
Cons:
- Overweight design causes the best citadel armour to be submerged below sea level, making the vessel prone to plunging fire (particularly the magazines)
- Very low damage output of the primary guns. Both SAP and AP shells offer lower average damage per minute than any contemporary vessel using equivalent shells in this BR
- No HE shells for the primary guns
- Significant crew count in exposed positions, making it prone to substantial crew losses from HE spam
History
Devblog History
After the London Naval Treaty, Italy decided to strengthen its battle fleet. For external and internal reasons, the creation of a new class was abandoned in favor of the decision to comprehensively modify two existing ships — battleships Conte di Cavour and Giulio Cesare. The Conte di Cavour — the lead ship of the series built in 1911 — was redesigned by 60-70%, with work on the ship completed in 1937. With the outbreak of hostilities of World War II, she took part in the Battle of Calabria. In November she was attacked by Swordfish torpedo aircraft in the port of Taranto and went down from a direct hit from a torpedo to the side. She was raised in July 1941 and after being towed to Trieste, she was not put into service and did not take part in any further battles. In 1943 she was captured by the Germans, and in February 1945 was lost to Allied bombing.
Media
- Skins
See also
Links to articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:
- reference to the series of the ship;
- links to approximate analogues of other nations and research trees.
External links
Arsenale militare marittimo della Spezia | |
---|---|
Battleships | |
Conte di Cavour-class | RN Conte di Cavour |
Duilio-class | RN Andrea Doria |
Italy battleships | |
---|---|
RN Dante Alighieri* | |
Conte di Cavour-class | RN Conte di Cavour · RN Leonardo da Vinci |
Duilio-class | RN Duilio · RN Andrea Doria |
Francesco Caracciolo-class | RN Francesco Caracciolo |
* = Unique ship |