Difference between revisions of "WSP XP PAGE"
Inceptor57 (talk | contribs) m (→Template for value comparisons: Made its own section) |
Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (Proposal for ammo racks) |
||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:relativeDifference}}>0 | {{#var:absPercentage}} {{{higher|higher}}} | {{#var:absPercentage}} {{{lower|lower}}} }} {{{than|than}}} | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:relativeDifference}}>0 | {{#var:absPercentage}} {{{higher|higher}}} | {{#var:absPercentage}} {{{lower|lower}}} }} {{{than|than}}} | ||
}}</includeonly> | }}</includeonly> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Proposal for Ammo racks == | ||
| + | Because ammo racks tables are not very intuitive, here is my proposal: | ||
| + | <!-- [[File:Ammoracks_{{PAGENAME}}.png|right|thumb|x250px|[[Ammo racks]] of the {{PAGENAME}}]] --> | ||
| + | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! Racks empty | ||
| + | ! none | ||
| + | ! 1 | ||
| + | ! 1 & 2 | ||
| + | ! 1 to 3 | ||
| + | ! 1 to 4 | ||
| + | ! 1 to 5 | ||
| + | ! 1 to 6 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! Racks full | ||
| + | ! 1 to 6 | ||
| + | ! 2 to 6 | ||
| + | ! 3 to 6 | ||
| + | ! 4 to 6 | ||
| + | ! 5 & 6 | ||
| + | ! 6 | ||
| + | ! none | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Shells onboard || __ ''(+__)'' || __ ''(+__)'' || __ ''(+__)'' || __ ''(+__)'' || __ ''(+__)'' || __ ''(+__)'' || __ ''(+__)'' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
Revision as of 17:17, 26 April 2020
For you to try new stuff: Only on this page. Not on any other page. - Enjoy.
Contents
Aircraft / Flight performance / Details
Proposal to avoid redundant info:
| Limits | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wings (km/h) | Gear (km/h) | Flaps (km/h) | Max Static G | |||
| Combat | Take-off | Landing | + | - | ||
| Available in the statcard | ___ | ___ | ___ | ~__ | ~__ | |
New compressor table
| Compressor (RB/SB) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Optimal altitude | Setting 1 | |
| 850 m | 2,100 hp | 100% Engine power |
| 0 m | 2,590 hp | WEP Engine power |
| Optimal altitude | Setting 2 | |
| 5,340 m | 1,700 hp | 100% Engine power |
| 4,500 m | 2,100 hp | WEP Engine power |
Current
| Compressor | Optimal altitude | 100% Engine power | WEP Engine power |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setting 1 | _,___ m | _,___ hp | _,___ hp |
| Setting 2 | _,___ m | _,___ hp | _,___ hp |
Old one
| Compressor (RB/SB) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Setting 1 | ||
| Optimal altitude | 100% Engine power | WEP Engine power |
| 1,500 m | 1,602 hp | 1,954 hp |
| Setting 2 | ||
| Optimal altitude | 100% Engine power | WEP Engine power |
| 5,900 m | 1,478 hp | 1,804 hp |
Template for value comparisons
This template proposal allows to quickly generate value comparisons. Eg. if you'll pass penetration values of 2 weapons, it can be used to generate text like "It's close Soviet counterpart has 21% lower penetration". It can accommodate to a different language versions and flexion via optional parameters. If accepted - it can be used to built template that would be automatically pulling values for the units based purely on their codes and specified attributes (idea is to make requests like jp_type_95_ha_go|us_m2a2|speed|forward|AB)
Proposal for Ammo racks
Because ammo racks tables are not very intuitive, here is my proposal:
| Racks empty | none | 1 | 1 & 2 | 1 to 3 | 1 to 4 | 1 to 5 | 1 to 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Racks full | 1 to 6 | 2 to 6 | 3 to 6 | 4 to 6 | 5 & 6 | 6 | none |
| Shells onboard | __ (+__) | __ (+__) | __ (+__) | __ (+__) | __ (+__) | __ (+__) | __ (+__) |
