Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chi-Ha LG"
(Response) |
Inceptor57 (talk | contribs) (Signage format) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Chi-Ha LG History Sources == | == Chi-Ha LG History Sources == | ||
− | Do we have any sources on the historical claims made at the end of the Chi-Ha LG page? I see no sources referenced, and have not seen this information repeated anywhere else. | + | Do we have any sources on the historical claims made at the end of the Chi-Ha LG page? I see no sources referenced, and have not seen this information repeated anywhere else. --[[User:U107001428|U107001428]] ([[User talk:U107001428|talk]]) 17:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |
− | + | :Most Of The Taken Information Has Been Drawn From The [https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B5%B7%E8%BB%8D%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E7%B3%8E%E8%87%AA%E8%B5%B0%E7%A0%B2 Japanese Wikipedia Article] On Said Vehicle. While It Still Misses Its Own Set Of Sources & Citations It Offers Way More Information Than Any Other Easy Access Page. If You Were To Have Any Concrete Sources / Documents That Would Say Otherwise Than From The Rather Short History Section On The WT Wiki, Please Don't Hesitate To Share, I'd Like To See For Myself Aswel. --[[User:U17577377|U17577377]] ([[User talk:U17577377|talk]]) 23:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC) | |
− | :Most Of The Taken Information Has Been Drawn From The [https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B5%B7%E8%BB%8D%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E7%B3%8E%E8%87%AA%E8%B5%B0%E7%A0%B2 Japanese Wikipedia Article] On Said Vehicle. While It Still Misses Its Own Set Of Sources & Citations It Offers Way More Information Than Any Other Easy Access Page. If You Were To Have Any Concrete Sources / Documents That Would Say Otherwise Than From The Rather Short History Section On The WT Wiki, Please Don't Hesitate To Share, I'd Like To See For Myself Aswel. [[User:U17577377| |
Latest revision as of 03:10, 22 May 2022
Chi-Ha LG History Sources
Do we have any sources on the historical claims made at the end of the Chi-Ha LG page? I see no sources referenced, and have not seen this information repeated anywhere else. --CJZEPP (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Most Of The Taken Information Has Been Drawn From The Japanese Wikipedia Article On Said Vehicle. While It Still Misses Its Own Set Of Sources & Citations It Offers Way More Information Than Any Other Easy Access Page. If You Were To Have Any Concrete Sources / Documents That Would Say Otherwise Than From The Rather Short History Section On The WT Wiki, Please Don't Hesitate To Share, I'd Like To See For Myself Aswel. --島風 (talk) 23:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)