|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | If the reload speed of the M13/40(II) will be the same as the M13/40(I) and M13/40(III), then why should anyone purchase the M13/40(II) Premium Tank? The gun depression and turret traverse speed for the M13/40(II) are worse than the M13/40(I) and M13/40(III). Tank to tank, the version (II) is now the worst of the three tanks!
| |
| | | | |
| − | M13/40 (II) and M13/40 (III) have wrong weapon reloading time. As M13/40 (II) and M13/40 (III) had semi-automatic variants of 47/32 cannon, unlike the first serie (M13/40 (I)), which had older variant of cannon with fully-manual reloading, their rate of fire should be similar to M14/41, which has exact same semi-automatic variant of the cannon.
| |
| − | Currently M13/40 (I), M13/40 (II) and M13/40 (III) have weapon reloading time of 5 s, while only M13/40 (I) should keep such reloading time.
| |
| − | M14/41 has weapon reloading time of 2,9 s, which matches the RoF mentioned in the manual for 47/32 semi-automatic cannon, this value should be used for M13/40 (II) and M13/40 (III) as well.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Suggestion-feedback on the subject of Italian rank I:
| |
| − | https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/554234-server-update-19052022/&do=findComment&comment=9337028
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Visual representation of 47/32 semi-automatic cannon RoF:
| |
| − | https://youtu.be/jjRcKuLCD3o?t=385
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Historical consultant's post showing the differance between M13/40 tank series:
| |
| − | https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/437925-fiat-m1340-whats-the-difference-between-i-ii-iii/&do=findComment&comment=7939459
| |
