Difference between revisions of "Talk:WSP Table Templates"
(Response) |
blastedryan (talk | contribs) (→the point of this page: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Could we possibly expand the aircraft's limits table to include takeoff and landing flaps breakage speed, instead of just combat flaps? It can be useful to know what speed your flaps break at when coming in to landing; particularly for aircraft like the Swifts, where there is a 600 kph difference in breakage speed between two flaps settings. In addition it would improve clarity for vehicles without combat flaps (Spitfires, Sea Hawk, etc.), currently the takeoff flaps breakage speed is put in the combat flaps box, or the box is left blank (depending on who wrote the page). Either way is not really ideal (for example the table on [[Spitfire F Mk IX]] page says the combat flaps break at 290 kph, when it does not have combat flaps and that is the actually the speed the landing flaps break at). --[[User:U13682523|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523|talk]]) 22:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC) | Could we possibly expand the aircraft's limits table to include takeoff and landing flaps breakage speed, instead of just combat flaps? It can be useful to know what speed your flaps break at when coming in to landing; particularly for aircraft like the Swifts, where there is a 600 kph difference in breakage speed between two flaps settings. In addition it would improve clarity for vehicles without combat flaps (Spitfires, Sea Hawk, etc.), currently the takeoff flaps breakage speed is put in the combat flaps box, or the box is left blank (depending on who wrote the page). Either way is not really ideal (for example the table on [[Spitfire F Mk IX]] page says the combat flaps break at 290 kph, when it does not have combat flaps and that is the actually the speed the landing flaps break at). --[[User:U13682523|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523|talk]]) 22:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
: Point taken and I completely agree. I've made a (tentative) edit to the table and it doesn't look bad, so it should hopefully be ok to go ahead. -[[User:U38088265|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265|talk]]) 22:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC) | : Point taken and I completely agree. I've made a (tentative) edit to the table and it doesn't look bad, so it should hopefully be ok to go ahead. -[[User:U38088265|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265|talk]]) 22:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == the point of this page == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The existence of a page like this kinda boogles my mind. Shouldn't we make all of these tables into templates that we then group together in a category? --[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 05:44, 31 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:44, 31 October 2019
Could we possibly expand the aircraft's limits table to include takeoff and landing flaps breakage speed, instead of just combat flaps? It can be useful to know what speed your flaps break at when coming in to landing; particularly for aircraft like the Swifts, where there is a 600 kph difference in breakage speed between two flaps settings. In addition it would improve clarity for vehicles without combat flaps (Spitfires, Sea Hawk, etc.), currently the takeoff flaps breakage speed is put in the combat flaps box, or the box is left blank (depending on who wrote the page). Either way is not really ideal (for example the table on Spitfire F Mk IX page says the combat flaps break at 290 kph, when it does not have combat flaps and that is the actually the speed the landing flaps break at). --Flame2512 (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Point taken and I completely agree. I've made a (tentative) edit to the table and it doesn't look bad, so it should hopefully be ok to go ahead. -DnaGonite (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
the point of this page
The existence of a page like this kinda boogles my mind. Shouldn't we make all of these tables into templates that we then group together in a category? --blastedryan (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
