Difference between revisions of "User talk:NurflugelHo229V2"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ? | Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ? | ||
| − | It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB. | + | It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB as in all sources you gave the VAB is cited. |
Revision as of 21:51, 26 October 2021
WZ-551
There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [Wikipedia] WZ-551, [Military Today] Type 92 and [Tanks Encyclopedia] Type 90 & 92 APC. --Colok76286 (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ? It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB as in all sources you gave the VAB is cited.
