Difference between revisions of "User talk:Suprā"
blastedryan (talk | contribs) m |
(→Hello!: new section) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::I'm not sure what would be the best map but I see there is a variance in atmospheric pressure between maps. Perhaps a map with as close to 1 atm at sea level would be optimal? I think some of the deviation from the expected values might also be from the speed of the plane. I tested the plane at ~300km/h and 1000m and got ~1800hp while going at ~640km/h got ~1930hp. I know jets exhibit this behavior but I've never seen it documented for prop planes as well.--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | ::I'm not sure what would be the best map but I see there is a variance in atmospheric pressure between maps. Perhaps a map with as close to 1 atm at sea level would be optimal? I think some of the deviation from the expected values might also be from the speed of the plane. I tested the plane at ~300km/h and 1000m and got ~1800hp while going at ~640km/h got ~1930hp. I know jets exhibit this behavior but I've never seen it documented for prop planes as well.--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::If it does follow the same behavior as jets then it should have a U shaped curve where you get the maximum horsepower at 0 speed. Why it works that way, I don't know.--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 01:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC) | :::If it does follow the same behavior as jets then it should have a U shaped curve where you get the maximum horsepower at 0 speed. Why it works that way, I don't know.--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 01:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Hello! == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hello I_Supra_I, I hope this message finds you well. When you have the opportunity, would you be able to [https://forum.warthunder.com/u/DnaGonite send me a PM on the forums]? Many thanks, [[User:U38088265|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265|talk]]) 22:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:13, 28 July 2023
horsepower graphs
I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers. They are wrong.--blastedryan (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- The expected values for the F-82e's WEP horsepower for 1 engine based on the code are
| Alt | WEP HP |
|---|---|
| 0 m | 1955 |
| 1000 m | 1955 |
| 6095 m | 1700 |
| 9143 m | 1329 |
- with a straight line connecting the points. So your graph is shaped correctly aside from the beginning values. Judging by my rough eyeballing of of your horsepower values your numbers are a bit off. Could you show me your raw data? Also please do not test in the test flight map many people have claimed it is inaccurate.--blastedryan (talk) 02:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- The 1955 might look odd then you'll be even more surprising that the 100% hp of the F-82 is 1600hp from 0 m all the way to 6095m. Feel free to test it.
- I'm not sure what would be the best map but I see there is a variance in atmospheric pressure between maps. Perhaps a map with as close to 1 atm at sea level would be optimal? I think some of the deviation from the expected values might also be from the speed of the plane. I tested the plane at ~300km/h and 1000m and got ~1800hp while going at ~640km/h got ~1930hp. I know jets exhibit this behavior but I've never seen it documented for prop planes as well.--blastedryan (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- If it does follow the same behavior as jets then it should have a U shaped curve where you get the maximum horsepower at 0 speed. Why it works that way, I don't know.--blastedryan (talk) 01:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello!
Hello I_Supra_I, I hope this message finds you well. When you have the opportunity, would you be able to send me a PM on the forums? Many thanks, DnaGonite (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
