Difference between revisions of "Talk:ZTZ96A (P)"
(Created page with "Regarding "Pro's": "125-I APFSDS has great penetration and damage against common tanks like the T-72, XM-1, Leopard 1, etc" > Leopard 1 is not a common tank/enemy for this t...") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding "Pro's": | Regarding "Pro's": | ||
| + | "Sturdy UFP and turret front against common foes such as the XM-1" | ||
| + | and | ||
"125-I APFSDS has great penetration and damage against common tanks like the T-72, XM-1, Leopard 1, etc" | "125-I APFSDS has great penetration and damage against common tanks like the T-72, XM-1, Leopard 1, etc" | ||
| + | |||
> Leopard 1 is not a common tank/enemy for this tank, XM-1 neither. | > Leopard 1 is not a common tank/enemy for this tank, XM-1 neither. | ||
| − | common enemies are more likely Leopard 2 and Abrams Family Tanks. T-72 is true thought. | + | common enemies are more likely (early) Leopard 2 and Abrams Family Tanks. T-72 is true thought. |
Its ammunition is not really a Pro, since its totally within the average performance of its Rating. Nothing special. | Its ammunition is not really a Pro, since its totally within the average performance of its Rating. Nothing special. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --Negesydd Nosol | ||
Latest revision as of 16:20, 9 August 2024
Regarding "Pro's":
"Sturdy UFP and turret front against common foes such as the XM-1" and "125-I APFSDS has great penetration and damage against common tanks like the T-72, XM-1, Leopard 1, etc"
> Leopard 1 is not a common tank/enemy for this tank, XM-1 neither.
common enemies are more likely (early) Leopard 2 and Abrams Family Tanks. T-72 is true thought.
Its ammunition is not really a Pro, since its totally within the average performance of its Rating. Nothing special.
--Negesydd Nosol
