Difference between revisions of "Talk:F8F-1"
(Created a Talk Topic about Supercharger Compressor Stage Results Being WEIRD) |
m (→Weird Compressor Results: Forgot to sign) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
How do you even chart this, and should you? It's so confusing. | How do you even chart this, and should you? It's so confusing. | ||
| + | --[[User:U86844506|U86844506]] ([[User talk:U86844506|talk]]) 20:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:42, 20 April 2023
Weird Compressor Results
I did a test on the supercharger power output with MEC, and there's an oddity here: At sea level, SC Stage 2 is superior to Stage 1 IF you're using WEP, otherwise the figures look like this:
| Compressor | Optimal altitude | 100% Engine power | WEP Engine power |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setting 1 | 300 m | 2,000 hp | 2,154 hp |
| Setting 2 | 2,500 m | 1,610 hp | 2,096 hp |
Which is nice and all, but if you ARE using WEP:
Under 575m Stage 1 takes the lead by a bit, but at 575m they are equal, and then Stage 2 takes the lead, entirely. Stage 1 & 2: 575m = ~2080 hp
At 2000m Stage 1: 1750 hp Stage 2: 2085 hp
But without WEP, Stage 1 is at 1750 hp vs Stage 2 with 1600 hp.
How do you even chart this, and should you? It's so confusing. --Chemputer (talk) 20:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
