Difference between revisions of "User talk:NurflugelHo229V2"
Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (Edits) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==WZ-551== | ==WZ-551== | ||
There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [[wikipedia:WZ-551|[Wikipedia] WZ-551]], [http://www.military-today.com/apc/wz_551.htm <nowiki>[Military Today]</nowiki> Type 92] and [https://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/China/WZ551-Type92_APC.php <nowiki>[Tanks Encyclopedia]</nowiki> Type 90 & 92 APC]. --[[User:U44629479|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC) | There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [[wikipedia:WZ-551|[Wikipedia] WZ-551]], [http://www.military-today.com/apc/wz_551.htm <nowiki>[Military Today]</nowiki> Type 92] and [https://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/China/WZ551-Type92_APC.php <nowiki>[Tanks Encyclopedia]</nowiki> Type 90 & 92 APC]. --[[User:U44629479|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ? It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB as in all sources you gave the VAB is cited. --[[User:U84459403|U84459403]] ([[User talk:U84459403|talk]]) 21:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC) | |
| − | Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ? | + | ::The VAB is cited to explain it has no paternity over the WZ-551. Look at 3D models of both vehicle fronts and you'll see that they differ greatly. All wheeled APCs from that period look the same: BTR-80, Patria Pasi, M93 Fox. --[[User:U44629479|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479|talk]]) 14:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC) |
| − | It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:18, 27 October 2021
WZ-551
There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [Wikipedia] WZ-551, [Military Today] Type 92 and [Tanks Encyclopedia] Type 90 & 92 APC. --Colok76286 (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ? It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB as in all sources you gave the VAB is cited. --NurflugelHo229V2 (talk) 21:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- The VAB is cited to explain it has no paternity over the WZ-551. Look at 3D models of both vehicle fronts and you'll see that they differ greatly. All wheeled APCs from that period look the same: BTR-80, Patria Pasi, M93 Fox. --Colok76286 (talk) 14:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
