User talk:U119723727

Spelling

It's spelled manoeuvrability: see the Cambridge dictionary. So please write it correctly next time, thank you. --Colok76286 (talk) 09:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

It's a regional difference (inc. to Cambridge), not incorrect spelling, like armor v. armour. Anyway, yeah, didn't know the Wiki was specifically a British thing... I suppose? --wellinthatcase (talk) 04:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Yes, we use British spelling but I'm not talking about regional differences in spelling. You wrote it "manvouerabiltiy", it's wrong spelling. And you wrote it 11 times that way so please proofread what you submit to the wiki or use a spellchecker, thank you. --Colok76286 (talk) 05:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

I know now that the wiki only allows British spelling (yes, you are talking about regional differences). Also, in the U.S, auto-correctors will suggest a correction to U.S preference, and vice versa for the U.K. I tested this using a VPN. Neat, ain't it? --wellinthatcase (talk) 04:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Once again, I'm not talking about regional differences in spelling. The word "manvouerabiltiy" does not exist, it's wrong spelling.--Colok76286 (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

It does indeed exist, the word I used, at least. You linked me the Cambridge Dictionary, and the Cambridge dictionary cites the disparity between U.S and U.K. Do you think Grammarly, and Google's spell check would both simultaneously be misinformed? --wellinthatcase (talk) 14:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

The word you used does not exist: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/spellcheck/english/?q=manvouerabiltiy I'm going to repeat myself: you wrote it "manvouerabiltiy", it's wrong spelling. And you wrote it 11 times the wrong way so please proofread what you submit to the wiki or use a spellchecker. --Colok76286 (talk) 14:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)