Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chi-Ha LG"
(→Chi-Ha LG History Sources: new section) |
(Response) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Do we have any sources on the historical claims made at the end of the Chi-Ha LG page? I see no sources referenced, and have not seen this information repeated anywhere else. | Do we have any sources on the historical claims made at the end of the Chi-Ha LG page? I see no sources referenced, and have not seen this information repeated anywhere else. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Most Of The Taken Information Has Been Drawn From The [https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B5%B7%E8%BB%8D%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E7%B3%8E%E8%87%AA%E8%B5%B0%E7%A0%B2 Japanese Wikipedia Article] On Said Vehicle. While It Still Misses Its Own Set Of Sources & Citations It Offers Way More Information Than Any Other Easy Access Page. If You Were To Have Any Concrete Sources / Documents That Would Say Otherwise Than From The Rather Short History Section On The WT Wiki, Please Don't Hesitate To Share, I'd Like To See For Myself Aswel. [[User:U17577377|Shimakaze]] ([[User talk:U17577377|talk]]) |
Revision as of 23:41, 21 May 2022
Chi-Ha LG History Sources
Do we have any sources on the historical claims made at the end of the Chi-Ha LG page? I see no sources referenced, and have not seen this information repeated anywhere else.
- Most Of The Taken Information Has Been Drawn From The Japanese Wikipedia Article On Said Vehicle. While It Still Misses Its Own Set Of Sources & Citations It Offers Way More Information Than Any Other Easy Access Page. If You Were To Have Any Concrete Sources / Documents That Would Say Otherwise Than From The Rather Short History Section On The WT Wiki, Please Don't Hesitate To Share, I'd Like To See For Myself Aswel. Shimakaze (talk)