Template talk:Clear

Does this offer anything new or necessary compared to the existing Template:Break? -DnaGonite (talk) 18:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

• Well, it's standard HTML (as opposite to a rather unconventional styling of br) and on top of that it supports clears of both or just one of the sides (defaulting to both), as opposite to just left, and finally: It's consistent with Wikipedia, as opposite to this break template that's completely different to Wikipedia's break. Whether it's necessary - in practice it's not absolutely necessary at the moment, no, but, in theory: it's superior in pretty much every way. Jareel_Skaj (talk) 19:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)