Difference between pages "AN-M65A1 (1,000 lb)" and "Talk:Main Page"

From War Thunder Wiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added A2D and AM-1)
 
(Add tutorials)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Description ==
+
== '''Important information:''' ==
''Write an introduction to the article in 2-3 small paragraphs. Briefly tell us about the history of the development and combat using the weaponry and also about its features. Compile a list of air, ground, or naval vehicles that feature this weapon system in the game.''
+
{{Notice|'''Please do not add anything: to any tech tree tables, when updates happen.''' Not because we don't want you to, because every time a change happens. It indirectly changes some important information which you can't see - Thus causes the table updates to be delayed, which isn't what anyone wants. - So please do not change, add images or pages which relate to any update. Have a great day! War Thunder: Wiki Team }}
  
=== Vehicles equipped with this weapon ===
+
<!-- Please do not remove this, or change what is above this text written here -->
<!-- ''List out vehicles that are equipped with the weapon.'' -->
+
:So what's the deal with the vehicles from 1.91 that are still missing pictures? 1.93 is almost here.--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 20:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
{{Navigation-Start|Vehicles equipped with this weapon}}
+
== ==
 +
Stay tuned we have some big news coming soon! - we are sure you are going like it! [[User:U1619975|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975|talk]])
  
{{Navigation-First-Line|'''Fighters'''}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|F4U}}{{Specs-Link|f4u-1a|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|corsair_fmk2|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f4u-1d|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f4u-4|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f4u-4b|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f4u-4b_vmf_214|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f4u-7|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|F6F}}{{Specs-Link|f6f-3|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|hellcat_fmk1|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f6f-5_france|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f6f-5n|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f6f-5n_france|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|F8F}}{{Specs-Link|f8f1|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f8f1b|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f8f1b_france|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|P-47}}{{Specs-Link|p-47d|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-47d-28|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-47m-1-re|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-47m-1-re_boxted|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-47n-15|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|P-51}}{{Specs-Link|p-51d-5|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-51d-10|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-51d-20-na|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-51d-30_usaaf_korea|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-51h-5_na|short}}
 
  
{{Navigation-First-Line|'''Twin-engine fighters'''}}{{Specs-Link|f7f1|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f7f3|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f-82e|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|p-61c_1|short}}
+
== date ==
 +
''Wiki news 30.Jan.2018'' <br>
 +
The year is 2019.--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 06:49, 31 January 2019 (MSK)
 +
:Dont'cha know? We time-traveling 2-OP's now. (Fixed) -[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 07:26, 31 January 2019 (MSK)
  
{{Navigation-First-Line|'''Jet fighters'''}}
+
==Images==
{{Navigation-Line|F3D}}{{Specs-Link|f3d_1|short}}
+
I have a question: Is there a set way/schedule that we are obtaining pictures for vehicles, is it actively being done? I have a bunch of the previous ones from the older version of the wiki, used them for myself. Being that Im a PS4 player, I would gladly do it if I had the resources (if I can get it working on my laptop.) Or should I disregard that and wait? --[[User:U30853183|U30853183]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 16:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC) '''Remove this when finished'''
{{Navigation-Line|F9F}}{{Specs-Link|f9f-2|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f9f-5|short}}
+
:There is no schedule or active project at the moment regarding the pictures of vehicles. --[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 16:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
{{Navigation-Line|F-80}}{{Specs-Link|f-80a|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f-80|short}}
+
::Then I shall see what I can do in regards to the pictures--[[User:U30853183|U30853183]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 16:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
{{Navigation-Line|F-84}}{{Specs-Link|f-84b|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f-84g|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f-84g_italy|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|f-84g_france|short}}
 
  
{{Navigation-First-Line|'''Attackers'''}}
+
== I can´t buy GE with my Steam acc! ==
{{Navigation-Line|A-26}}{{Specs-Link|a-26b|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|a-26b_10|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|AD-2}}{{Specs-Link|douglas_ad_2|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|AD-4}}{{Specs-Link|douglas_ad_4|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|douglas_ad_4_france|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|A2D}}{{Specs-Link|a2d|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|AM-1}}{{Specs-Link|am_1_mauler|short}}
 
  
{{Navigation-First-Line|'''Bombers'''}}
+
I tried today to buy some GE with my Steam acc but for some reason it didnt work.Can anyone help me?
{{Navigation-Line|A-26}}{{Specs-Link|a-26c|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|a-26c-45-dt|short}}
+
: Hello, please consult [https://support.gaijin.net/hc/en-us/articles/200069881-How-To-Purchase-Eagles- this page] to see if you are doing it correctly. If so and it is still not working, please contact [https://support.gaijin.net/hc/en-us Gaijin support]. --[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 06:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
{{Navigation-Line|A-35}}{{Specs-Link|a-35b|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|B-10}}{{Specs-Link|b_10b|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|B-17}}{{Specs-Link|b-17e|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|b-17e_japan|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|b-17e_late|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|b-17g|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|B-18}}{{Specs-Link|b_18a|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|B-24}}{{Specs-Link|b_24d|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|pb4y-2|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|pb4y-2_france|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|B-25}}{{Specs-Link|b_25j_1|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|b_25j_20|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|B-29}}{{Specs-Link|b-29|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|BTD-1}}{{Specs-Link|btd-1|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|PBM-3}}{{Specs-Link|pbm_3|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|PBY-5}}{{Specs-Link|pby-5|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|pby-5a|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|pby-5a_raf|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|pby-5a_ussr|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|PV-2D}}{{Specs-Link|pv_2d|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|SB2C}}{{Specs-Link|sb2c_1c|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|sb2c_4|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|sb2c_5_france|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|SB2U}}{{Specs-Link|sb2u-2|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|sb2u-3|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|v_156_b1|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|SBD-3}}{{Specs-Link|sbd-3|short}}
 
{{Navigation-Line|Wellington}}{{Specs-Link|wellington_mk1c|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|wellington_mk1c_late|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|wellington_mk3|short}}{{-}}{{Specs-Link|wellington_mk10|short}}
 
  
{{Navigation-End}}
+
==Specs-Card==
 +
I noticed in-game that the Specs-Card for the Sherman IC "Scorpion" now has the Polish flag rather than the British one. I would change it on here myself but I dont know how. Just giving you a heads up if someone could do it, or show me how (my main problem is trying to access the specs cards themselves)--[[User:U30853183|U30853183]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 05:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
:(oops, somehow this got deleted): I will try to bring this up and see if it is possible to adapt the spec-cards to the new flag images. --[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 06:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
:*I don't believe there is a way for you to change the data on the Specs-Card (to include which flag icon is displayed). The Specs-Card is a set of parsers and switches which all tie back to the vehicle code (<nowiki>uk_sherman_ic_firefly</nowiki>). All of the linked data exists on a database outside of the reach of us wiki editors/moderators. Sometimes data in-game changes and the wiki lags behind in updating some of those changes. That which we can change we do (thanks to you guys!), unfortunately, other data we have to wait for the Gaijin magic to make changes on the back end. - [[User:U64962917|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917|talk]]) 10:50, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
::It shouldn't be possible for the polish flag to show up. There has to be a picture on with wiki with the formate File:countryname_flag.png. The only flags available are [https://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?search=flag.png&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns6=1 these]--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 14:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
::*I believe there are separate teams working on the in-game stat cards and the wiki stat cards, things will get rolled out in-game before the in the wiki. Many things like the flag icons will be rolled out on the .ru wiki and then copied to ours. The .ru moderators will need to add the image and update the stat card template to reflect the option for the Polish flag on the .ru wiki and then it will be updated on ours soon after (hopefully soon after, depends on what fires they are having to put out). - [[User:U64962917|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917|talk]]) 14:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
:::Oh wait I misread the question. I dunno why but I though he said the wiki card somehow had the polish flag not the ingame one.
 +
:To answer the original question, the flags in Specs-Card is currently tied to the vehicle tree country. So all vehicles in a tech tree have the same flag. For example  the entire Japanese tech tree has the postwar Japan flag. The Russian Wiki guys would need to add a new 'flag' parameter to the Specs database and adjust Specs-Card to use that parameter.--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 16:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
  
== General info ==
+
== can we do something about the search function? ==
''Tell us about the tactical and technical characteristics of the bomb.''
 
  
=== Effective damage ===
+
It's so bad that it's practically useless. I write panzer 2 in the search field, and the first result is the sd. Kfz. 234/2. No sign of the panzer 2 on the first page. It seems to take into account the CSS code of the page, which is.. perplexing to say the least.
''Describe the type of damage produced by this type of bomb (high explosive, splash damage, etc)''
 
  
=== Comparison with analogues ===
+
Hello The search function is working, i have just tested it. Please clear your cookies and cache, If that still does not work for you. Please [https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/909-war-thunder-wikipedia/&ct=1567683350 Click here] Make a post, list your browser + version you are using, and explain the full process you do on how you perform the search. So we can further investigate this. Kindest Regards --[[User:U1619975|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975|talk]]) 11:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
''Give a comparative description of bombs that have firepower equal to this weapon.''
 
  
== Usage in battles ==
+
:The issue with your search is that it is searching for the most occurrences of "panzer" and "2". Most pages referring to the panzer 2 on the wiki refer to it by its shortened name Pz. so none of those pages will be found. Since we use "Pz." instead of "panzer", there are basically no pages with "panzer" so you are basically looking for the page with the most occurrences of "2". If you want to improve your search results you can either use "Pz." or search "panzer 2" in quotes. You can find more details on how searching on the wiki works [[mw:Help:searching|here]]. --[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 12:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
''Describe situations when you would utilise this bomb in-game (vehicle, pillbox, base, etc)''
+
:: The usage of roman numerals in the Panzer names (Pz. II, Pz. III, etc.) probably doesn't help at all with "Panzer 2" being able to find "Panzer II". However, as BlastedRyan said, you would have to use the shortened "Pz." in place of "Panzer" to find the desired tanks.--[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 15:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 +
::: Is it maybe worth creating a few redirect pages for the Panzer series?
 +
:::: I'd say it's definitely worth it. It's a chore to have to remember the nomenclature for each vehicle, which kinda defeats the purpose of a search bar, which is to help you get to the page you want in as few inputs as possible. --[[User:U19353526|U19353526]] ([[User talk:U19353526|talk]]) 20:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 +
::::: We are currently working on some ideas, to improve this, based on this feedback! it's really great you are leaving feedback. We hope you have a great day!  --[[User:U1619975|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975|talk]]) 21:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
  
=== Pros and cons ===
+
== Add tutorials ==
''Summarise and briefly evaluate the weaponry in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark pros and cons as a list.''
 
  
'''Pros:'''
+
Shouldn't we have pages about tutorials for certain situations, like flying with one wing, and dealing with multiple enemies at once ETC? [[User:U56907291|U56907291]] ([[User talk:U56907291|talk]]) 16:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
*
+
: Each plane has their own unique handling characteristics so it makes it kind of hard to make one general page that can encompass every flight characteristics and models present. As such, if they exist, these details have been constrained to within the vehicle page in question. However, I would not begrudge the drafting of such specific pages for the situations, as we do have pages regarding aerobatic maneuvres like Boom-n-Zoom so these specific instructional pages are not forbidden (just needs approval). --[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 16:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 
 
'''Cons:'''
 
*
 
 
 
== History ==
 
<!-- ''Describe the history of the creation and combat usage of the weapon in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the weapon and adding a block "/ History" (example: <nowiki>https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Weapon-name)/History</nowiki>) and add a link to it here using the <code>main</code> template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <code><nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki></code>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <code><nowiki><references /></nowiki></code>.'' -->
 
Early in aviation history, applications for aircraft to serve in a military capacity surfaced, not only with the intent to scout a battlefield from an aerial vantage point but for the possibility to drop explosive bombs too. Due to the frail nature of the early wood-frame and cloth covered aircraft, lifting capacity resulted in the ability to only carry small bombs. Effectively these early bombers were hailed as aerial artillery fire which could reach targets hundreds of miles further than the most powerful land-based cannons of the time. Prior to the war, contests abounded where pilots would drop oranges or flour sacks upon predesignated targets to see who could hit closes to the centre.
 
 
 
Italian aviators were the first to use bombs in a warfare capacity in 1912 during their campaign in Tripoli. These first bombs were conversions of existing cannon ammunition and were effective only against personnel as they did not provide a strong enough provision to damage hardened equipment or structures. As lifting capacity of aircraft increased, so did the ability for them to carry more and larger explosives.
 
 
 
For the United States, bomb design did not become a priority until the middle of 1917 when a French official came to the U.S. with several samples of the Gros Andreau bombs which the French were using in large quantities at that time. Immediately these bombs were accepted by the U.S. and used as a standard in developing the first three sizes to be implemented in the military. These three bombs were known as the early "Mark" series, the 25 lb Mk.I demolition bomb, 50 lb Mk.I demolition bomb and 100 lb Mk.I demolition bomb. By December 1917, only six months later, the military put forth requirements for the development of bombs larger than the existing 100 lb bomb. After two more months of development, production of demolition bombs up to 1,000 lbs was started. Rejected 3-inch artillery rounds were the basis for early 25 lb bombs which were modified into a streamlined shape, very similar to the British Cooper bombs of the time. Larger bombs were manufactured and filled with explosive filler, all of which were placed into a streamlined body, for which a cylindrical shape was the most advantageous.
 
 
 
Early on, the Mark series of bombs proved to be largely unsatisfactory in a number of different areas. The bomb body itself was weak due to the sheet metal it was made from and the number of welds needed to join the pieces together. The stabilising fins were made of flimsy metal which tended to distort during both the handling and flight of the bomb, adversely affecting accuracy. For the field technicians, inserting the fuse was a complicated process which required removing the stabilising fin structure, potentially damaging the fins. The fuses tended to have a high fail rate and due to their design, they would instantly arm after release from the aircraft posing a direct threat to the delivery aircraft. Later modifications would eliminate many of the negative factors to include adding a nose fuse, time-delayed arming of the fuse, strengthening of the stabilising fins and adding primer detonators to ensure proper explosive train sequences. Other changes including streamlining all bomb bodies and utilising 100% T.N.T. as an explosive filler resulted in the newer "Modified Mark" series of Army bombs.
 
 
 
Prior to World War II, the military determined that the Modified Mark series of bombs were obsolete, requiring newer and up-to-date bombs to be developed. Both the U.S. Army and Navy began development of their own series of bombs, the Army with the "M" series and the Navy with their "Mk" series. Both similar, these bombs were designed with parallel sides, an ogival nose and a boat tail which is a box type-tail reinforced to prevent warping and aid with accurate drops. Due to the shortage of T.N.T., the Army filled their bombs with 50/50 Amatol with T.N.T. ends to seal in the Amatol and protect it from moisture. The Navy, on the other hand, continued to manufacture their bombs with 100% T.N.T.
 
 
 
With the approach of World War II, the U.S. Army (including the Army Air Corps) and the Navy standardised their series of bombs allowing for interchanging between services, consolidating manufacturing capabilities and allowing for modifications which enabled British service aircraft to mount these bombs too. Even after the standardisation of bombs in 1941, the standardisation process went through a few phases of further refinement, the first of which changed all high-explosive bombs to be termed general purpose (G.P.) or general purpose high-explosive (G.P.H.E). Later the designation of "demolition bomb" would come back for a few specific bombs.
 
 
 
When bombs are dropped, there is always a chance that something in the explosive train of the bomb will fail and it will not explode. Early AN style bombs were defusable in the event that they did not explode on contact, meaning that any unexploded AN bomb could have the fuses and boosters removed without the bomb exploding, rendering it inert. To counter this and allow for the potential "dud" bomb to explode when tampered with, the AN G.P.H.E. series bombs with the modification "A1" annotated that these bombs now had special pins mounted in the bomb's baseplate which fused with the explosive filler making it impossible to remove the booster without causing the bomb to detonate. Other modifications later added would include minor changes to the bomb body or the type of explosive filling used. During this time a second option for bomb tails was added, the box-type tail was already the mainstay of the bombs, however, to create a more aerodynamic bomb a conical tail assembly was added. This stretched out low profile tail improved the aerodynamics of the carrying aircraft, allowing it to carry more ordnance.
 
 
 
Progressing towards the Korean and Vietnam wars, piston-driven aircraft were giving way to jet fighters, bombers and attackers, many of which carried their ordnance on external pylons hung under the wing or underbelly. The new Mk 80 series bombs (Mk 81, 82, 83 and 84) were developed to keep external hung ordnance from creating too much drag on the delivery aircraft. Initially, the Mk 81 250 lb bombs were considered ineffective for their size or required a large amount to be effective and were removed from the munitions inventory. All-weather fighters and attackers were now being outfitted with the Mk series bombs and a new problem developed when it came to low-altitude attacks (typically coming in under low cloud cover) where the aircraft would deploy its ordinance which would hit the ground and explode catching the delivery aircraft in either the explosive blast or the shock-wave from the blast.
 
 
 
Modifications were developed to slow down or retard the flight of bombs, allowing for the delivery aircraft to depart out of the blast zone before they hit and detonated. Several options became available which allowed these bombs to remain aerodynamic low-drag while en-route to the target, but when deployed converted to high-drag, slower falling bombs. One option was to attach four bladed plates to the rear of the bomb so that when the bomb deployed, these plates would pop out and create high-drag to slow the fall. Another option was to use a ballute which was basically an airbag which deployed from the rear of the bomb that acted like a drogue chute, effectively causing high-drag. Later during the fighting in Iraq, the US military brought back the 250 lb Mk 81 bombs due to their ability to be used when deploying against a specific target and to help minimise collateral damage.
 
 
 
== Media ==
 
''An excellent addition to the article would be a video guide, as well as screenshots from the game and photos.''
 
 
 
== See also ==
 
''Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:''
 
* ''reference to the article about the variant of the weapon;''
 
* ''references to approximate analogues by other nations and research trees.''
 
 
 
== External links ==
 
''Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:''
 
* ''topic on the official game forum;''
 
* ''encyclopedia page on the weapon;''
 
* ''other literature.''
 
 
 
{{Bombs}}
 
 
 
[[Category:Suspended armaments]]
 

Revision as of 16:43, 10 January 2020

Important information:

Msg-info.png Please do not add anything: to any tech tree tables, when updates happen. Not because we don't want you to, because every time a change happens. It indirectly changes some important information which you can't see - Thus causes the table updates to be delayed, which isn't what anyone wants. - So please do not change, add images or pages which relate to any update. Have a great day! War Thunder: Wiki Team
So what's the deal with the vehicles from 1.91 that are still missing pictures? 1.93 is almost here.--blastedryan (talk) 20:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Stay tuned we have some big news coming soon! - we are sure you are going like it! patrioticalien (talk)


date

Wiki news 30.Jan.2018
The year is 2019.--blastedryan (talk) 06:49, 31 January 2019 (MSK)

Dont'cha know? We time-traveling 2-OP's now. (Fixed) -Inceptor57 (talk) 07:26, 31 January 2019 (MSK)

Images

I have a question: Is there a set way/schedule that we are obtaining pictures for vehicles, is it actively being done? I have a bunch of the previous ones from the older version of the wiki, used them for myself. Being that Im a PS4 player, I would gladly do it if I had the resources (if I can get it working on my laptop.) Or should I disregard that and wait? --JonCS29@psn (talk) 16:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC) Remove this when finished

There is no schedule or active project at the moment regarding the pictures of vehicles. --Inceptor57 (talk) 16:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Then I shall see what I can do in regards to the pictures--JonCS29@psn (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

I can´t buy GE with my Steam acc!

I tried today to buy some GE with my Steam acc but for some reason it didnt work.Can anyone help me?

Hello, please consult this page to see if you are doing it correctly. If so and it is still not working, please contact Gaijin support. --Inceptor57 (talk) 06:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Specs-Card

I noticed in-game that the Specs-Card for the Sherman IC "Scorpion" now has the Polish flag rather than the British one. I would change it on here myself but I dont know how. Just giving you a heads up if someone could do it, or show me how (my main problem is trying to access the specs cards themselves)--JonCS29@psn (talk) 05:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

(oops, somehow this got deleted): I will try to bring this up and see if it is possible to adapt the spec-cards to the new flag images. --Inceptor57 (talk) 06:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
  • I don't believe there is a way for you to change the data on the Specs-Card (to include which flag icon is displayed). The Specs-Card is a set of parsers and switches which all tie back to the vehicle code (uk_sherman_ic_firefly). All of the linked data exists on a database outside of the reach of us wiki editors/moderators. Sometimes data in-game changes and the wiki lags behind in updating some of those changes. That which we can change we do (thanks to you guys!), unfortunately, other data we have to wait for the Gaijin magic to make changes on the back end. - AN_TRN_26 (talk) 10:50, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
It shouldn't be possible for the polish flag to show up. There has to be a picture on with wiki with the formate File:countryname_flag.png. The only flags available are these--blastedryan (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
  • I believe there are separate teams working on the in-game stat cards and the wiki stat cards, things will get rolled out in-game before the in the wiki. Many things like the flag icons will be rolled out on the .ru wiki and then copied to ours. The .ru moderators will need to add the image and update the stat card template to reflect the option for the Polish flag on the .ru wiki and then it will be updated on ours soon after (hopefully soon after, depends on what fires they are having to put out). - AN_TRN_26 (talk) 14:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Oh wait I misread the question. I dunno why but I though he said the wiki card somehow had the polish flag not the ingame one.
To answer the original question, the flags in Specs-Card is currently tied to the vehicle tree country. So all vehicles in a tech tree have the same flag. For example the entire Japanese tech tree has the postwar Japan flag. The Russian Wiki guys would need to add a new 'flag' parameter to the Specs database and adjust Specs-Card to use that parameter.--blastedryan (talk) 16:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

can we do something about the search function?

It's so bad that it's practically useless. I write panzer 2 in the search field, and the first result is the sd. Kfz. 234/2. No sign of the panzer 2 on the first page. It seems to take into account the CSS code of the page, which is.. perplexing to say the least.

Hello The search function is working, i have just tested it. Please clear your cookies and cache, If that still does not work for you. Please Click here Make a post, list your browser + version you are using, and explain the full process you do on how you perform the search. So we can further investigate this. Kindest Regards --patrioticalien (talk) 11:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

The issue with your search is that it is searching for the most occurrences of "panzer" and "2". Most pages referring to the panzer 2 on the wiki refer to it by its shortened name Pz. so none of those pages will be found. Since we use "Pz." instead of "panzer", there are basically no pages with "panzer" so you are basically looking for the page with the most occurrences of "2". If you want to improve your search results you can either use "Pz." or search "panzer 2" in quotes. You can find more details on how searching on the wiki works here. --blastedryan (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
The usage of roman numerals in the Panzer names (Pz. II, Pz. III, etc.) probably doesn't help at all with "Panzer 2" being able to find "Panzer II". However, as BlastedRyan said, you would have to use the shortened "Pz." in place of "Panzer" to find the desired tanks.--Inceptor57 (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Is it maybe worth creating a few redirect pages for the Panzer series?
I'd say it's definitely worth it. It's a chore to have to remember the nomenclature for each vehicle, which kinda defeats the purpose of a search bar, which is to help you get to the page you want in as few inputs as possible. --BasedTransQueen (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
We are currently working on some ideas, to improve this, based on this feedback! it's really great you are leaving feedback. We hope you have a great day! --patrioticalien (talk) 21:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Add tutorials

Shouldn't we have pages about tutorials for certain situations, like flying with one wing, and dealing with multiple enemies at once ETC? TravelByTrain (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Each plane has their own unique handling characteristics so it makes it kind of hard to make one general page that can encompass every flight characteristics and models present. As such, if they exist, these details have been constrained to within the vehicle page in question. However, I would not begrudge the drafting of such specific pages for the situations, as we do have pages regarding aerobatic maneuvres like Boom-n-Zoom so these specific instructional pages are not forbidden (just needs approval). --Inceptor57 (talk) 16:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)