Search results

...such as Cologne or Stalingrad, the T-44 is great at out-circling lumbering heavies and placing shots in their flanks, as well as in capping target zones in Do {{USSR medium tanks}}

* Terrible reload speed. Getting into brawls with contemporary heavies like the Tiger II is ill-advised {{USSR heavy tanks}}

...R-471D shell and will struggle to knock out hull down American mediums and heavies like the M48 Patton and T32 {{USSR heavy tanks}}

* Lack of APCR ammo, in case you have to go against heavies like the Jumbo {{USSR tank destroyers}}

...uch as possible and slightly angled facing enemies directly. When engaging heavies it's best to not go toe to toe; however by disabling a track or turret the {{USSR heavy tanks}}

* Terrible reload speed. Getting into brawls with contemporary heavies like the Tiger II is ill advised. {{USSR heavy tanks}}

* Like most Russian heavies, has an abysmal 3 degrees of gun depression, so finding the proper hull dow <ref name="BoldyrevTank">Boldyrev, Eugeni. "Last Heavy Tanks of the USSR." The Russian Battlefield. N.p., 18 Sept. 2011. Web. 08 Jan. 2018. [https:/

...airfield defense system, what is the difference between the three American heavies T29, T30 and T34, what are the differences between [[Air-to-air missiles#In :''War Machines:'' [[Mi-24D (USSR)|Mi-24D]]

...in front of HEAT, APFSDS, spaced/composite armour, etc. Even the mightiest heavies like the [[Maus]] and [[M103]] are just moving punchbags for modern technol * Faster reload and better gun handling than comparable USSR or PRC tanks

...ation at ranges beyond 2 km, and the fact that you cannot reliably destroy heavies frontally. Unlike most tanks, it thrives best in an uptier, where you face * [[T26E5]], [[T34]], [[T32 Heavy Tank (Family)|T32]] - These American heavies cannot be taken out frontally quickly enough to avoid return fire. Either f